(Topic ID: 138272)

WPPR formula change to v5.2 for 2016!

By ifpapinball

8 years ago


Topic Heartbeat

Topic Stats

  • 446 posts
  • 57 Pinsiders participating
  • Latest reply 7 years ago by ryanwanger
  • Topic is favorited by 10 Pinsiders

You

Linked Games

No games have been linked to this topic.

    Topic Gallery

    View topic image gallery

    12669318_946183265472677_2067917693_o_(resized).jpg
    Stl_(resized).jpg
    Mpin_(resized).jpg
    lvl257_(resized).jpg

    You're currently viewing posts by Pinsider snailman.
    Click here to go back to viewing the entire thread.

    #260 8 years ago
    Quoted from ifpapinball:

    We (and by we I mean Shepherd) just got the test site back up.
    Here's what I'm seeing between that SPF from 2013 and today:
    WPPR v5.1
    You had a Rating of 1751 then, 1738 now (-13 in those 2 years)
    Zach had a Rating of 1984 then, 2178 now (+194)
    Bowden had a Rating of 1817 then, 2262 now (+445)
    Bowen had a Rating of 1583 then, 1853 now (+270)
    WPPR v5.2
    You had a Rating of 1700 then, 1644 now (-56)
    Zach had a Rating of 1806 then, 1885 now (+79)
    Bowden had a Rating of 1681 then, 1834 now (+153)
    Bowen had a Rating of 1692 then, 1699 now (+7)
    (It's worth mentioning that under v5.2 NOBODY has a 2000 rating - Elwin has the highest at 1984. Where as under v5.1 there are 21 players with +2000 ratings)
    While I'm playing around on the test site, I looked up Adam Kiesler who finished 45th at Pinburgh. Under today's rules his Ratings get impacted by a 567-44 record, v5.2 he'll have a 32-32 record.
    WPPR v5.1 --> Adam's rating from Pinburgh goes from 1661 to 1882, an increase of 212 points
    WPPR v5.2 --> Adam's rating from Pinburgh goes from 1592 to 1605, and increase of 13 points
    Fascinating stuff for sure

    And what is the new WPPR value for a super league winner with the updated rating #'s?

    1 month later
    #310 8 years ago
    Quoted from LOTR_breath:

    I'll never understand this stuff! That's why I just play and submit and let the IFPA Cray Super Computer do the rest!

    IFPA Cray Super Computer = Brian Shepherd

    1 month later
    #368 8 years ago
    Quoted from chuckwurt:

    Okay then I am all for unrestricted over all divisions. If an A player wants to purposefully tank in qualifying so that they can play and win B division, they still only finished 25th overall, didn't win any money (in most cases), and their points they were awarded were way less. Plus, they still have to beat the other people in B to win. There were some damn good players in B division classics at LAX.

    I disagree. B division is there to provide a finals competitive option for lesser skill level players. We should not allow an option for people to purposefully tank and play in a lower division. Because sadly, this would happen.

    1 month later
    #404 7 years ago

    @Russell: I'm certain there is at least one other thread (if not 3 or 4) here that discusses your exact point, that addresses your arguments and others. I didn't find it immediately with my first search, but I'd encourage you to look for it and read through it.

    It tends to crop up every year within days after PAPA world championships end.

    You're currently viewing posts by Pinsider snailman.
    Click here to go back to viewing the entire thread.

    Reply

    Wanna join the discussion? Please sign in to reply to this topic.

    Hey there! Welcome to Pinside!

    Donate to Pinside

    Great to see you're enjoying Pinside! Did you know Pinside is able to run without any 3rd-party banners or ads, thanks to the support from our visitors? Please consider a donation to Pinside and get anext to your username to show for it! Or better yet, subscribe to Pinside+!


    This page was printed from https://pinside.com/pinball/forum/topic/wppr-formula-change-to-v52-for-2016?tu=snailman and we tried optimising it for printing. Some page elements may have been deliberately hidden.

    Scan the QR code on the left to jump to the URL this document was printed from.