If the hardtops have no wear issues and there is no realistic, noticeable difference then I would probably prefer the hardtop because it is likely cheaper. If it plays the same it wouldn't matter much to me. Since I haven't seen one in person, I can't be 100% sure but as long as they look similar to original then it seems like a good option.

Would always prefer an original.
Just a personal preference.

If all else is equal between two games; one hardtop and one nicely touched up and cleared original. I would pick the cleared original.

Why? I view a properly touched up and cleared original holds more value than essentially a playfield protector with art.

That said, I do understand that not all games warrant the effort and cost of a repro playfield or touched-up/cleared restoration. Hence, the demand for hardtops. Therefore, I don't see hardtop restorations holding equal value.

Hardtops play really bad....

Is this really a question? I don't see why anyone would want a hardtop over an original in good shape. Hardtops are a good option as a last resort.

Maybe I'm just a terrible player, but I'd take a hardtopped playfield over a super worn playfield with raised inserts any day. I think they play just fine.

That being said, I'll always prefer an original playfield, or at least a faithful reproduction from CPR and the likes.

Original cleared pf every time.

I've said this before and gotten laughed at, but i like to hear the ball roll around on the playfield. And it DOES play differently. I've had a hardtop for my Evel Knievel that I haven't installed yet hoping CPR spits some pf's out instead.

Original by far.

original for me too

Trick question?