Topic index (key posts)

4 key posts have been marked in this topic

Display key post list sorted by: Post date | Keypost summary | User name

Post #1634 Observations & insight on JJP/Mirco playfield pooling issue Posted by AMSNL (2 years ago)

Post #1649 Uncut playfield photos Posted by AMSNL (2 years ago)

Post #1660 Thin clear coat issues Posted by AMSNL (2 years ago)

Post #2410 Info regarding support for newer motherboards/CPU/GPU and OS updates directly from JJP. Posted by dr_light (2 years ago)

Topic indices are generated from key posts and maintained by Pinside Editors. For more information, or to become an editor yourself read this post!

You're currently viewing posts by Pinsider hammerhead.
Click here to go back to viewing the entire thread.

I've started some data collection to see how expansive this JJP problem really is. Please contribute.

Also, could someone figure out a way to keep these up top so they don't slip into the nether regions of Pinside.

SE
https://pinside.com/pinball/forum/topic/jjp-playfield-chipping-data-collection-se#post-6270790

LE
https://pinside.com/pinball/forum/topic/jjp-playfield-chipping-data-collection-le#post-6272458

CE
https://pinside.com/pinball/forum/topic/jjp-playfield-chipping-data-collection-ce-1#post-6270787

Quoted from swampfire:
^^^ Seriously, three separate threads on this? Just ask people to post whether their game is SE, LE or CE.

Three separate threads because I understand they employed the pf fix on the CEs, and likely on the LEs that followed so this would show if it actually worked or not.

Quoted from Yelobird:
Agreed. Seems like a no value data collection. If they don't have the game who cares about that vote?

I'm trying to get as much data as possible, including past owners. The data is useless if only a handful take part.

Quoted from Yelobird:
Understood but in this Stern vs JJP showdown forum how valid do you Really expect the vote???

I don't know but it may be interesting

Quoted from jimwe5t:
JJP wants to get away from those nightmare warranty problems, so they have pretty much abandoned mechs since, POTC (removed treasure chest mech and triple spinning disk mechs, the 2 most important fun mechs in the game).

IMDN is proof that you don't need a bunch of plastic toys, gimmicks, dinosaurs throwing the ball around, etc. to have a really fun game!

I wouldn’t have an issue with a matte clear, provide the protection and cut down on the gloss to hide imperfections

Quoted from jimwe5t:
If Stern tried this terrible policy, everyone would be up in arms and call for a boycott.

Do you really think this would be the case? It would be exactly the same whether it's JJP or Stern.

Promoted items from Pinside Marketplace and Pinside Shops!

You're currently viewing posts by Pinsider hammerhead.
Click here to go back to viewing the entire thread.

Reply

Wanna join the discussion? Please sign in to reply to this topic.

Hey there! Welcome to Pinside!

Donate to Pinside

Great to see you're enjoying Pinside! Did you know Pinside is able to run without any 3rd-party banners or ads, thanks to the support from our visitors? Please consider a donation to Pinside and get anext to your username to show for it! Or better yet, subscribe to Pinside+!

Help – Contact – About Pinside – Support Pinside – Top

Why is JJP still making games with faulty playfields?

By PanzerFreak

2 years ago

Topic Stats

You

Find in topic

Linked Games

Topic Gallery

Topic index (key posts)

Hammerhead

Hammerhead

Hammerhead

Hammerhead

Hammerhead

Hammerhead

Reply

Hey there! Welcome to Pinside!