Quoted from jimwe5t:Talking tough with Mirco is a fools game and an outright diversion. Mirco is not the issue. They are not the ones that put artwork under the posts. Drill PF holes too large for the posts; improperly fitting and over tightening posts at the JJP factory, etc. Ordering too thick of clear coat is also on JJP. Why do you keep blaming Mirco thinking they are the ones in control of JJPs product??? Mirco is just a vendor and does what JJP tells them to do. How long are you JJP fanboys going to keep trying to pass the buck and live in denial???
(Your talk of volume is also preposterous. You don’t, nor does any person other than JJP know the numbers they are producing and its for sure not thousands. They can only output around 40 a week, that much we do know. They’ve been at this for a year making GNR. Let’s give them say 40 weeks they were actually able to make that many, given part shortages. That’s only 1600 GNRs, which is doubtful with all the smart people that have pulled their orders because of poor quality products, no warranty, bad customer service and part shortages. Hugely doubtful that JJP has even made much more than around 1200 to be more accurate, given all the parameters. JJP is a tiny boutique company about the size of Spooky, but Spooky has their act together and makes a far superior product. Remember during an even longer time period, they only made 1,000 POTC.)
I kind of disagree.
While JJP indeed has a massive responsibility in the management of the issue, Mirco is the manufacturer of the playfield. As such, they are responsible for the quality of it. JJP, just like any integrator, buys a product with given specifications. In any industry, if the supplier fails to deliver (ie Mirco), the customer (ie JJP) is entitled for a corrective action plan and potentially compensation. The fact they are not pursuing that route is, frankly, baffling.
Pushing the blame on JJP on the basis of 'art under the post', 'thick clearcoat' is not relevant. If a supplier feels that the specifications given by the customer impact quality, they have to deny these requests. Again, that happens in every industry (and for that matter, I'm precisely dealing right now on a problem of that nature in my field, ie electronics).
Also, Mirco has a track record. There are multiple testimonies over multiple issues over multiple playfield reproductions, and for those JJP was completely out of the loop.
So in my opinion they are not responsible of the playfield quality itself
However they should have acknowledged the issue, implemented a corrective action plan, and adressed customer concerns, which they didn't. For that they are responsible.
And for that reason alone, no JJP for me in the foreseeable future.