First, I am a fanatical PL fan- Ive owned every GOOD game (pre-Stern) he's made.
Second, I wouldn't be "in" on ANY game he made, even if B/W went back into business until I actually played it!
I also don't agree with the oft-stated, shrill decree that "if not for pre-orders, no new pinballs would ever be made."
Please note that MANY (most?) new products were the result of a company taking some risk, investing their own capital or borrowing it and bringing a product to market.
Now I don't blame companies from trying what JJP has tried- pushing all the risk to the consumer. But lets not fool ourselves into believing this is somehow the ONLY way that pinball could be brought to the market. It is simply the EASIEST way for the manufacturer.
//soapbox
Prepayment schemes will continue, so long as there's still an abundance of fanatical/irrational demand that outweighs common sense.
IS there any common ground between the current craziness and rational thinking? Maybe.
I would be FAR more trusting of a program to fund new development that looked more like this:
1. Small initial payment to lock in spot, communicate demand to company (say $500-$1000)
2. one or two more installments to cover the ramping costs of production, materials, etc.
3. Final payment (maybe $1500-$2500) not due until machine is BUILT and ready to ship.
This would maintain the motivation of the manufacturer to DELIVER in a timely manner and somewhat avoid the attractiveness of line jumping new orders because the manufacturer wouldn't already be sitting on 100% of the cash!