Quoted from Adams:I was just at that stop yesterday coming back north from LA to SF area.
half the superchargers have been upgraded to the V3 250kw units (20 V3 and 20 V2)
At the end of a holiday weekend at 5pm, it was only half full (curious enough, half the V2 chargers were used and half the V3 chargers were used. Not sure if people just didn't notice that both were available?)
I do think a lot of people are charging for longer either because their battery is almost dead and so it starts charging at a slower rate or they are charging it nearer to full and the last 10% takes a longer time (and sometimes both).
still there's no way people average over 40 min (and I think that's a gross overestimate)
I pulled in yesterday with 11 miles left on the battery and probably charged about 40 min but that's pretty much the maximum possible and I don't think that's at all normal
V3 really only benefits long range Model 3s right now, I think. I think short range is capped at 150 kwh, and S / X are around the same.
What version of Tesla do you have?
Quoted from OnTheSnap:I've never been so free and happy. Gone are the burdens of having to stop to fill a tank every freaking week for $80. And once every few months, when i don't charge at home, I enjoy a few minutes of Netflix/hulu/disney plus on the screen, or scarf down food trying to beat the charger.
I keep having people who know me tell me I'm sacrificing and justifying it due to all the issues charging, but I don't see any of it as a sacrifice. I have eaten every stop I've had to make, and had the car tell me it was ready to drive before the fast food was handed to me. I'm sure at some point I'll have an experience that isn't as good, but I haven't found it yet.
Quoted from phil-lee:Despite solar the primary source of electricity for electric vehicles will come from nuclear power plants. The first waste from nuclear production /experimentation is still here, as is all nuclear waste ever produced. It will stay around,and hazardous, for 85000 years. There is no "Disposal" method, nowhere to put it, nobody wants it.
Electricity produced by nuclear power is not Green. You do nothing to help the Planet by using electric vehicles unless 100% of recharging is performed using solar, wind, an impossible task unless your trips are confined to a small area.
The psychological benefits are immense though, as it makes one feel good.
What in the world are you talking about? Like, I seriously don't understand what your point here is, as there is no where other than maybe France where the majority of non-renewable energy is produced by nuclear. And even if it was, it depends on your goal. If you're arguing about planet warming gases, no - nuclear doesn't produce those. If you're worried about meltdown, okay, but that's a super confined issue. Otherwise, I don't get it.
Most cars charge overnight currently. Even if you're charging on a network of mostly coal, those plans have to idle at rates high enough they are producing more electricity than needed overnight, so you're using a resource that otherwise wouldn't be used for no additional environmental impact. Many areas *are* using wind, and those areas can produce that wind overnight.
Quoted from phil-lee:I do not remember saying any of those things. I do know Tesla build quality is cheap, welds are poor, parts are hard to come by sometimes with a long wait and repairs are expensive, hence they are cheap in quality throw away disposable cars. Perhaps Toyota can build a great electric vehicle.
Ahhhhhhhhhh, now I get it! Hahaha, yeah, Toyota is going to pave the electric future, the company who keeps proclaiming hydrogen is the future. I won't go into the many reasons that this is pure insanity for mobile technology, but... no.