(Topic ID: 5103)

Which machine is best to invest in for collector quality?

By Vanquish09

12 years ago


Topic Heartbeat

Topic Stats

  • 25 posts
  • 18 Pinsiders participating
  • Latest reply 12 years ago by Vanquish09
  • No one calls this topic a favorite

You

Linked Games

No games have been linked to this topic.

    You're currently viewing posts by Pinsider jimjim66.
    Click here to go back to viewing the entire thread.

    #22 12 years ago

    I have had my MM and TOTAN restored, and I am having my MB, AFM restored. It will be a very long time, if ever, I will get what I put into them.

    So here is what I suggest, pick the pin that is your favorite and that you will never sell unless you absolutely have to. Out of the pins listed, only you can answer what is your personal favorite. I would not have somebody answer that for you.

    MM has gone way up in price and I am still way upside down on it even though my base machine cost me 6000.

    I do not look at my machines as an investment. I don't think most people realize the cost of labor and parts on a restore is often at least double the base price of a pin, unless it is a cheaper pin then the restore can be almost 3 times the base price. (Think 2300 Whitewater = 7500 restored pin) Too hard to ever "flip" a restored pin. So it is not a good investment, but rather a really fun purchase.

    You're currently viewing posts by Pinsider jimjim66.
    Click here to go back to viewing the entire thread.

    Reply

    Wanna join the discussion? Please sign in to reply to this topic.

    Hey there! Welcome to Pinside!

    Donate to Pinside

    Great to see you're enjoying Pinside! Did you know Pinside is able to run without any 3rd-party banners or ads, thanks to the support from our visitors? Please consider a donation to Pinside and get anext to your username to show for it! Or better yet, subscribe to Pinside+!


    This page was printed from https://pinside.com/pinball/forum/topic/which-machine-is-best-to-invest-in-for-collector-quality?tu=jimjim66 and we tried optimising it for printing. Some page elements may have been deliberately hidden.

    Scan the QR code on the left to jump to the URL this document was printed from.