Quoted from Aurich:We're trying to be patient with you, but it's really obvious that you don't understand this topic. I'm sorry you don't like how the real world works, and it doesn't match this neat picture you have in your head where Lyman steps out of the shower, jots down the code into a spreadsheet, and hands it off to his junior programmers to whip out while he goes and takes a nap. It doesn't work that way, and your frustration with it won't change that.
All I know is I agree (with chessiv last post)and have been saying the same thing as chessiv. Maybe you don't understand. So what have I been saying that is different than chessiv's last post. Do you take issue with him as well?
Your the one trying to put words in my mouth like neat and tidy. But that's just a distraction because in the end your over simplifying everything attempting to get down to a point that you may be able to defend (fact or fiction doesn't matter). Kind of like the advice a friend of mine was given in defending is PHD thesis. If you don't know the answer just answer a different question you actually know.
They can shut me up anytime by delivering complete rule sets to these machine on day 1 or shortly after until then I think it is you that doesn't understand