Quoted from Bublehead:But my argument there would be how can you "own" the first tweet? It was an event in time/space that happened on a specific day, at a specific time... it was a simple text phrase "just setting up my twttr," and the application processed it and sent it out, and stored it in the database. This "tweet" is nothing but a string of 200 ones and zeros that were processed. There is no actual value to this jumble of digital data, no matter what supposed "provenance" you attach to it using blockchain technology... somebody actually paid 2.9 million dollars to own 200 bits of information that were created by some monkey sitting at a keyboard tap tap tapping in 25 ascii characters. Hell, this post includes that identical string of bits but its worth is just my own two cents.
Our overall idea of what things are worth is changing.
I look at digital assets like patents (loosely). Patents are ideas, and in many cases may never be actualized into tangible items, but they still are worth whatever someone would pay for them.
That isn't to say I necessarily agree with all the use cases. I also look at 'digital' items as things that can easily be copied in one manner or another. The more valuable something is, the more people are going to try to hack, steal and/or copy it. Digital (regardless of encryption/blockchain etc) is one of the easiest things to steal/lose/copy/whatever. I think the biggest issue though is survivability. The area I am unclear on is as with all digital items....okay so the NFT is made 2021 on current systems. In 200 years, will it still even be accessible for others to see (say in museums).
A few somewhat practical ways this could be implemented in Pinball is...custom animations, custom artwork, custom callouts....etc.