24
Stern, 2009
AC/DC (LE)
Stern, 2012
AC/DC (Premium)
Stern, 2012
AC/DC (Pro)
Stern, 2012
Addams Family Gold (Special Collectors Edition), The
Bally, 1994
Addams Family, The
Bally, 1992
Aerosmith (LE)
Stern, 2017
Aerosmith (Premium)
Stern, 2017Quoted from SLCpunk2113:Stern: Historically doesn’t release games based on anniversaries, movie release dates, or (made up) holidays.
Pinside: Mandalorean is being announced May 4th because a podcaster who is wrong as much as he’s right said so!!!
Stern: No announcement May 4th
Pinside:
I don't like defending him, but he definitely posted it was revealing May 11th not May 4th. Star Wars fans want a May 4 reveal.
Also, it is only 12 central time. Plenty of time left.
Quoted from SLCpunk2113:Stern: Historically doesn’t release games based on anniversaries, movie release dates, or (made up) holidays.
Pinside: Mandalorean is being announced May 4th because a podcaster who is wrong as much as he’s right said so!!!
Stern: No announcement May 4th
Pinside:
Lol I posted this minutes before stern posted the trailer. Usually they tease early in the morning. I’m really surprised we are get yet another Star Wars pin.
wow mando aye should be wicked love the show an love star wars theme an pinballs but none jump out to me hopefully they pull this off goodluck stern
Quoted from Flippersaurus:Do we know who the design team is?
I don't think anyone has said, but assuming either Eddy/Lonnie or Eddy/Dwight.
Quoted from SLCpunk2113:Stern: Historically doesn’t release games based on anniversaries, movie release dates, or (made up) holidays.
Pinside: Mandalorean is being announced May 4th because a podcaster who is wrong as much as he’s right said so!!!
Stern: No announcement May 4th
Pinside:
This did not age well
Quoted from Zukram:That youtube tease says coming soon, not coming next....
Exactly. Watch Mando be a "home pin" and not a mainline title. 
It's plausible Stern is teasing it just because it's May 4th, not because it's actually next or a mainline.
Why did people doubt it when MNpinball confirmed it? He's literally never been wrong about a new release and I'm just going to play it safe and assume he's never wrong about anything else in life either until it's proven otherwise. Kudos to Rarehero as well (I wonder if he was K's source?).
Quoted from Palmer:This did not age well
Hell, it barely even aged before the video was posted. haha
Quoted from Medic:Should we quote all the people on here that said Kaneda was full of shit?
He still usually is.
Quoted from iloveplywood:Why did people doubt it when MNpinball confirmed it?
This is why I believed it as well.
Quoted from PinMonk:I don't think anyone has said, but assuming either Eddy/Lonnie or Eddy/Dwight.
jeeze...rick,,,I hope its not Dwight... 
Quoted from Zukram:That youtube tease says coming soon, not coming next....
I just talked to my distributor, its next and its a good one compared to there last release i was told. Also there is LE, Premium, Pro model so not a homepin.
Quoted from kidchrisso:I hope its not Dwight...
Stern programmers have been doing all kinds of wacky things lately...some people enjoy recent rules & code - I'm one who doesn't.
Mando seems like it's IMPOSSIBLE to screw up no matter who's coding it. Not to say it can't happen, but I'll be bummed if it goes into math-chess tourney territory. The show's relatively modular action/quest episodes really lend themselves to a nice classic type of pinball ruleset. A handful of modes that are action scenes or quests...and few multiballs based on iconic events...a few wiz modes based on big story finales. Throw in some other little bits of business to collect so there's always other things to do outside of or stacking with modes...and boom, you've got a game.
https://pinside.com/pinball/forum/topic/this-is-the-way-stern-mandalorian-pinball
So, take it there.
Back on topic now: BTTF anyone?
Cheap shots at Dwight are so lame. He’s an excellent coder. Lord of the rings awesome, Ghostbusters awesome, TMNT awesome, TSPP awesome, Game of Thrones awesome...oh, Munsters? Not his fault. Borg told to keep the games rules and code simple like a 90’s BW and that precisely what he did. People who wanted a game with a deep all set and tons of assets should not have bought munsters , period.
Quoted from kidchrisso:jeeze...rick,,,I hope its not Dwight...
Quoted from mpdpvdpin:Cheap shots at Dwight are so lame. He’s an excellent coder. Lord of the rings awesome, Ghostbusters awesome, TMNT awesome, TSPP awesome, Game of Thrones awesome...oh, Munsters? Not his fault. Borg told to keep the games rules and code simple like a 90’s BW and that precisely what he did. People who wanted a game with a deep all set and tons of assets should not have bought munsters , period.
How is Munsters not his fault? He decided to make it weak..not Borg. GB is awesome now, yea...waited 30+ months for my LE to improve, but I did. TSPP snoozer, GOT is good, SW is still a hot mess. Go to bat for your boy, I could give a F. He is 50/50 in my book, always will be, there are better coders out there.
Quoted from mpdpvdpin:Cheap shots at Dwight are so lame. He’s an excellent coder. Lord of the rings awesome, Ghostbusters awesome, TMNT awesome, TSPP awesome, Game of Thrones awesome...oh, Munsters? Not his fault. Borg told to keep the games rules and code simple like a 90’s BW and that precisely what he did. People who wanted a game with a deep all set and tons of assets should not have bought munsters , period.
Attack from Mars has relatively simple rules and so do many "classic" B/W pins that have even less code than Munsters. They are still very fun and rewarding. Munsters is neither. It's a fail no matter how you frame it. No excuses.
Game of Thrones is one of my favorite pins, and TMNT code is also very well done, but every coder has that pin they don't want to talk about. Munsters has to be Dwight's. I'd take a Dwight pin over a lazy Lonnie pin any day of the week.
Quoted from mpdpvdpin:Cheap shots at Dwight are so lame. He’s an excellent coder. Lord of the rings awesome, Ghostbusters awesome, TMNT awesome, TSPP awesome, Game of Thrones awesome...oh, Munsters? Not his fault. Borg told to keep the games rules and code simple like a 90’s BW and that precisely what he did. People who wanted a game with a deep all set and tons of assets should not have bought munsters , period.
Keith Johnson did TSPP & LOTR. Not Dwight.
“Simple” doesn’t have to mean “easy boring trash”. Borg designed Iron Man & Tron. Simple games with simple rules - but simple rules that are exciting, fun and addicting.
TSPP, a snoozer? You must not be very good at pinball. It really only rewards more advanced players.
Quoted from kidchrisso:How is Munsters not his fault? He decided to make it weak..not Borg. GB is awesome now, yea...waited 30+ months for my LE to improve, but I did. TSPP snoozer, GOT is good, SW is still a hot mess. Go to bat for your boy, I could give a F. He is 50/50 in my book, always will be, there are better coders out there.
Quoted from PilotPinball:Still waiting for Godzilla.
Up next.
Quoted from colonel_caverne:It is Lyman turn to code.
This is the way.
Since there's a pro model, it's unlikely to be Lyman. Stern is saving his marquee pull for their rip-off Prem/LE/Super LE releases only (See: Batman '66, EHOH) these days. Can't blame them.
Quoted from PinMonk:Since there's a pro model, it's unlikely to be Lyman. Stern is saving his marquee pull for their rip-off Prem/LE/Super LE releases only (See: Batman '66, EHOH) these days. Can't blame them.
He works part-time? 
I don’t hope so.
Unless who is the best coder except Lyman according to you?
Wanna join the discussion? Please sign in to reply to this topic.
Great to see you're enjoying Pinside! Did you know Pinside is able to run without any 3rd-party banners or ads, thanks to the support from our visitors? Please consider a donation to Pinside and get anext to your username to show for it! Or better yet, subscribe to Pinside+!
This page was printed from https://pinside.com/pinball/forum/topic/what-will-be-the-next-stern-pinball-machine/page/351 and we tried optimising it for printing. Some page elements may have been deliberately hidden.
Scan the QR code on the left to jump to the URL this document was printed from.
Indianapolis, IN
Nürnberg
Saint-Étienne
