Quoted from wrb1977:

It is unbelievable to me how the majority of Pinsiders in this thread are unable to read and comprehend the simple trade deal offered by Mirco...
It is crystal clear...
MIRCO KEEPS THE ORIGINAL PLAYFIELD IN EXCHANGE FOR A REPRO PLAYFIELD!!!
Everyone that is currently ruining Mirco’s reputation please read the terms of the deal in the threads that I attached in previous posts...it’s black and white!
And still...NOT ONE Pinsider can show anything from Mirco that shows a different agreement other than the one above.

Quoted from Highclasspinball:

Yes there are some special agreements with some customers and yes, of course I will stick to them. In the quicksilver case, we had a special agreement as that was a redone playfield but so far plastics are ot finished. I will have them done in January so they are no longer needed. Usually the donor playfields aren't bad shape, very rarely they are nos or similar. The quicksilver one has completely off colors after the touch up. So usually it is not usable anymore. But that is only my opinion....
Regards,
Mirco

Quoted from wrb1977:

I get that it’s more than just crispin...he’s the only one that detailed his agreement...so that’s all I could go by. The point in my past couple posts is about what Mirco just said. If he’s saying he said all along that people would get their playfields back that’s total bs. As recently as this thread Mirco explained that the terms of the trade deal were that he keeps the originals! If he’s saying something different now...wow. That’s why I’m thinking/hoping Mirco just meant his deal with crispin where he agreed to return the original to him and not his general trade offer. This was detailed in the communications shared by crispin. If Mirco flip flops within this thread alone on what they said, he clearly can’t be trusted and I’m an idiot for backing him and his words.

Quoted from PinRob:

According to pipes post #355 one is guilty of stealing something loaned them without any proof of “intent”. So if one goes to pipes court and forgot to return a loaned item, well that doesn’t matter, congratulations you are going to be convicted of a crime. Glad pipes isn’t a real judge. One would also hope he isn’t on a jury if needed to deliberate the case. I’m glad there are real courts to determine if criminal activity has been carried out. If pipes had included that “intent” was determined to have been carried out in his post he would have correct, but he did not. Drop Mic.