I'm not judging one way or the other because I have no dog in this fight. I can however, provide information regarding Kickstarter that you can interpret however you see fit. This is going to be a wall of text, but bear with me.
My wife and I recently ran a successful Kickstarter campaign related to her passion: knitting. We produced a variety of products aimed at the knitting community including posters, shirts, tote bags and buttons.
It was our first attempt at a Kickstarter campaign and we had only a slight idea of what we were in for. We set a very low funding goal of $900. We wanted to have a goal that was reasonable to achieve, that way even if we only sold a few things, she would still get to see people wearing stuff we made at the various knitting shows and retreats.
Fortunately for us, we blasted past our goal and our campaign ended at an astounding $12,400 in funding.
We were also a Staff Picked campaign. We never really got any information regarding how or why it happened. As far as we have been able to determine, it seems that campaigns that have a reasonable chance of being successful and profitable get flagged for Staff Picks. Being a Staff Picked campaign moves you up on the ladder whenever someone searches for any terms related to your tags or within your category. Keep in mind, that "successfully funded" and "project completed and delivered" are not the same thing.
As long as it isn't hurting their bottom line, Kickstarter does not care if your project is completed or not. The responsibility of completing a project and delivering it to the consumer falls squarely on the shoulders of the creator. Once the campaign is funded, Kickstarter gets their cut and they are more or less out of the picture.
They make it very clear that the creator is legally obligated to deliver the goods if funding is successful. What they don't make as clear is that they have no obligation to facilitate the refund.
Kickstarter is very much based on trust and transparency. Unfortunately some campaign creators out there break that trust. Not only does that hurt their supporters financially, but it also hurts the thousands of honest creators out there. I'm sure there are plenty of other people out there who would have funded our campaign, but had reservations because of bad experiences with other projects.
To give a solid example of how important trust and transparency are and how they go hand-in-hand, you can look at our tote-bag fiasco. (Fiasco is probably too strong a word.) When we took delivery on our tote bags, we realized that they were of a much lower quality than advertised. Rather than spin a tale of lament, we got out in front of it immediately. We called the manufacturer and adamantly voiced our concerns. We agreed to ordering an entirely new run of much higher quality bags at a 30% discount. We then sent out a message to every backer, it explained the situation and informed them that their bags will be different than pictured, but of much higher quality. Thankfully, only one person requested a refund (which we handled immediately) and we received a handful of emails supporting our actions and praising our honesty.
We now sell the remaining "bad stock" on our shop. We were fortunate that the "fiasco" ended up benefiting us financially.
Post edited by MattG: Didn't want to sound prechy and self serving!