Quoted from n0s4atu:I still think it looks great, will know for sure in a few hours, but if this is "mirrored" could someone please explain exactly what the "mirroring" process is? I always assumed that much like a mirror it meant painted on glass.
So the original mirrored backglasses that we think of, the late 70s early 80s classic stuff, that was actually done by taking a piece of mirrored glass, and then putting a protective layer over all the parts you wanted to be mirrored. Then the whole thing was dipped in acid, and the mirror coating that wasn't protected was etched away. Leaving you with clear glass with mirrored parts. Then you did your silk screens on that, one screen per color. 11 colors wasn't uncommon. Lot of work.
Fast forward to now.
Instead of acid etching a mirror there's a special mirrored ink that's laid down just like a normal spot color. I forget how much it costs, Stu or Kevin from CPR said it's something like $1000 a gallon. Pricey. But much easier than the toxic and time consuming acid process I guess.
Also, instead of doing 11 colors etc, and doing a screen per color, the Stern glasses at least (and the CPR translite -> backglass conversions) are done with CMYK. So 4 color process. 5 when you add the mirrored ink layer. My Metallica photo from last night shows that Stern was fusing on a white layer on top of that, some kind of plasticky material, so that's not an ink layer apparently.
Here's the thing: printing is printing. The mirrored ink is laid down just like any other color (I presume, maybe it has some special printing needs) so in theory there's no reason why you couldn't put it on a translite or translite-like material instead of glass.
I guess that's "cheating" but if it's bonded to the glass so there are no waves or ripples and the mirroring looks good I'm hard pressed to say why it matters. Even when it was straight to glass Stern was still doing CMYK, it's not like they were screening 11 colors.
All I know is now I want to figure out how to make a mirrored translite.