Quoted from ForceFlow:To go as far to patent that is pointless.
The back side of translites are easily damaged. An open backbox offers no protection.
In a commercial setting, an open cabinet can be an easy way for someone to mess with a game. Not all locations have games up against a wall.
Lastly, every time someone tries putting all the boards in the lower cabinet, they figure out that it doesn't work, and move boards up into the backbox in the end.
Yeah, but where is the mechanism? There's no key hole on the front or sides that I can see.
It's mounted on standoffs, the standoffs are on metal brackets, and the brackets are screwed to the playfield. It doesn't look like there is anything that moves.
No, but a lot of things are poorly thought out. A lot of good engineers already figured out what works and what doesn't.
At a glance, I pointed out a bunch of things that are problematic. Anyone who has moved or worked on games before would easily know they're problematic and why.
Pin2k playfields had rails so you could set a playfield down while outside of a game, so it's not a new concept--just one that hasn't been employed much. Most rail systems on games used the rear edge/corners of the playfield, so that would force any supports to be somewhere in the inner area of the playfield. But at the rear third of the playfield doesn't generally have a whole lot of available space, and a floor support would take up some real estate.
Adding playfield supports like on ninja eclipse makes the playfield bigger than it needs to be. Shipping an assembled replacement playfield will be a challenge and costly. Traditional playfields can be packed in a much smaller crate. And saying that this won't need to happen is just a lack for foresight. Bally & Williams did it back in the day, and stern & JJP have done it much more recently.
Well, they were doing all the wrong things at deeproot, and it seems some of the bad habits that were learned made their way over to Turner.