Quoted from BackFlipper:What if people could only review 10 (+/-) games their first year on Pinside? Or, maybe each Pinsider could have a top 10 list of games, and those are the only games they can review. Maybe they could review 2 or 3 more each and add 2 or 3 more to their list each year after that. Maybe then they would not "waste" a review on a game just to affect it's ranking.
This is one of a several posts I have read recently in the forums proposing to somehow restrict the ability of newer members to rate games. I strongly object to this suggestion, and I think it would really turn people off from joining the site.
I joined Pinside recently, after being an avid player on location for several years, mainly because I am planning to move to a bigger place in the near future and want to buy a pinball machine when that happens. I have been checking the site every few days, and just by reading, I am learning a great deal about pinball machine ownership, what to look for, what to expect, what kind of games I may be able to afford, and lots of other things. It has been very educational and enlightening for me, and made me even more excited to move and get a game as soon as possible.
But since I have never owned a game of my own and am not ready to buy one just yet, my ability to actually participate in the discussions on the forums is pretty limited. I try to comment when I think I have something relevant to say, but that doesn't happen too often yet. Mostly I just lurk and read.
Because of my lack of experience in ownership/buying/selling pinball machines, rating games is basically the only way I feel like I am able to actually participate in and contribute to Pinside. If the site placed a strict limit on my ability to do that, simply because I have not been a member for years, that would significantly reduce my enjoyment of the site and make me a lot less interested in being a member at all.
It basically amounts to telling people new to the hobby that they are unwelcome and it feels very mean. I don't think that's necessarily a message anyone who has made these suggestions intended, but to a new member, that is how it comes across.
Quoted from BackFlipper:Think about it. A top ten list for everyone here would give a better indicator of the games people truly love. Even if a person put TRON LE or AC/DC LE 10th and rated it poorly, they would not be able to rate a game they liked better, unless they drop it from their list.
I don't like this idea either. I think the ultimate result of something like this would be that the vast majority of ratings on the site end up being for maybe 20 to 30 games. I personally don't care about what is in the top 10 or top 20 or number 1 on the list because all the A games are way outside my budget anytime in the foreseeable future anyhow. I am far more interested in reading the reviews for the B and C list titles, because those are machines I am probably going to end up getting. If you limited people's ability to rate games to only a "Top 10," then you would end up with even fewer ratings for less popular and less famous games than you have now. I wish most of those games had more comments!
----
If I could see any change to the rating system, it would be for members to have the ability to leave comments on a game without giving it a rating. I have only rated games that I have played enough to feel that I really have a decent sense of what they have to offer, which for me hovers around the 50 plays or more on a machine mark. (I know other people have lower thresholds, they are probably better pinball players than me.) There are a lot of games I play or have played enough that I feel like my impressions could be helpful to someone wanting to learn more about the machine, but have not played enough to feel like I am qualified to give a numerical score in so many different categories.