Quoted from Snailman:Hilton, I enjoyed getting to meet you. You're a good pinball player and a smart guy. And I appreciate the few elements of your criticism that are informed and constructive. That's not a bad idea for the parent/child tourney.
I enjoyed meeting you also Colin.
Quoted from Snailman:But I highly suggest you learn what you're talking about before spouting off and whining/complaining.
I call it feedback and am trying to be constructive. Simply put, it is best when running a large limited qualifying tournament where big $ are on the line to ensure that some people playing do not have advantages over others. I think the best way to do this is to have a TD (and assistant TDs in this case I suppose since that is whom was really running the show form my experience) get a portion of the prize pot as payment for their efforts. I would suggest $500-$800 as a fair payment. Do you think you had no advantages by setting up and play testing games in advance? It is easy to remove these advantages by just removing the main TD from competing.
Quoted from Snailman:You're welcome for all the hours that Ken, Rachel, Kim, Ed, and I -- along with numerous volunteers and pin exhibitors -- put into planning, arranging, and running a successful tournament.
I said thanks to each and every helper many times. I am very thankful for what they all do. I run many events (none this calibur or large or stressful) so I fully understand what it is like to have to be on that side of things and how thankless a job it can be. Ask your helpers and I am sure many will relay how greatful I was for their work.
Anytime I had a question or experienced a malfunction and asked for an official, you were the one to respond. You were the one that appeared to be running the entire thing from a players perspective. Thanks to Ken for bringing his DM and all that he did.
You obviously do care and put alot of effort into the tourney. I care also and that is why I am even providing feedback on what I would like to see for future improvements.
Quoted from Snailman:If you're so great and knowledgeable about all things of tournament directing and pin upkeep at a festival, why weren't you volunteering to help?
I would be happy to help in future years if you needed it. This is not my local show, but happy to lend a hand if you need it in the future. I tried to provide a few last minute suggestions when I arrived early, but they seemed to not be wanted at the time. For example, I made the suggestion that the skillshot on fireball is important and the shooter rod was a bit gummy past the front third of a pull. I was told the skillshot plunge is on the front 1/3 of the pull so it was not needed.
Quoted from Snailman:There was a whole team of volunteers that set up and tested the pins -- not just me.
You knew the feeds and skillshot plunges on all the games upfront. This is something that needs to happen when a TD is setting up games and tweaking them to be appropriately brutal yet fair. By the nature of it, anyone that is helping set up and tweak games should be learning the feeds. My suggestion is around trying to limit or remove these advantages from competition that follows setup. The easiest way to do this is to not have the main person playing in the event.
Quoted from Snailman:You suggest that one person -- who shouldn't be allowed to play -- could do all of it? In TPF's case: too many pins
I personally can set up 12 pins in about 6hours, assuming those pins are playing good and have been gone through in advance by owners and before they arrive at the show. If you dont have 1 person that is willing/able to do this then I would suggest leveraging the style of the event to help remove advantages from future years. Have 3 era specific people. 1 person sets up the 4 DMDs and tweaks them, but then does not play in the main event. They can still compete but only on the SS and EM categories. This would be a good way to level the playing field.
When it all comes down to it, there are advantages to being part of any tourney and helping to set up games. I know this as I run lots of events and have seen these advantages myself in the past. Knowing the games in advance is a greater advantage when dealing with a very limited qualifying style of event. You will note that often when TDs host (for example a SCS in a private collection) that there is atleast a practice time for people to be able to get a feel for the games, learn feeds, and find tilts during warm-up. TPF does not have this option given the number of competitors so they should work to address the advantages of those familiar with the games in different ways.
If 1 person is not able to do all set up and tweaking then I suggest thinking out of the box to help to continue to grow the event and make it a premier competition.
TPF tournament is definately on the right trajectory. I hope there are continueed improvements to keep it on the right trajectory. Despite some of the last minute hiccups, it was a fun event and a HUGE thanks to all the voulenteers that put it on! I hope you can take some time to step back and chew on my feedback to see that what I am saying are godo things if you want the event to realy grow to the next level. I think you have all of the makings of a top 4 event if you keep making adjustments each year.
If you want help with next year then please reach out and let me know in advance. At this time I do not plan to come back to TPF but woudl be happy to do so if you want a hand. I would even voulenteer to be the DMD setup guy and then not compete on those games in the tourney and on play the SS and EMs. I think we could also add in some daily events, a split flipper, and some other fun competitions.