Quoted from VGVGVG:My restored games are EK, Strikes & Spares, Dolly Parton, Mousin Around, Bad Cats, Centaur & Fish Tales (& soon to be Fathom & Diner).
Your opinion seems to be pretty set, considering that you've got more restored games than many people have owned in total, lol.
I think you'll find that there's very few post-EM owners that would choose unrestored over restored given a marginal price difference. Past that, it becomes personal price tolerance as to whether or not you feel it's a good value.
EM's....you're going to find a lot of mostly old farts out there that only want it as original as possible. And for certain historically important games (and all prewar games), sure. I'm in on that. There's something to be said for preserving history.......IF the game is still in good to great condition. There's absolutely nothing to gain by insisting that some rotted out, flaky paint cabinet is better off "original" than repainted, IMO, or a beat to shit playfield.
There's also some fun to be had in customization during restoration if you know you don't intend to sell the game for a very long time. Like I would've NEVER repainted Crescendo's playfield if I hadn't also been adding UV highlights and whatnot, and having it cleared. It's just not worth the effort and money to me.
*Edit* Just to be perfectly clear, when I say "restored" that includes both NOS and repro items. There's definitely value skews between these two things and I'd choose one or the other depending on if I felt like the repro was of suitable quality, as O-din said. Sometimes it's really questionable.