(Topic ID: 264759)

The top 100 should be closed

By dnapac

4 years ago


Topic Heartbeat

Topic Stats

  • 128 posts
  • 74 Pinsiders participating
  • Latest reply 3 years ago by Viggin900
  • Topic is favorited by 2 Pinsiders

You

Linked Games

No games have been linked to this topic.

    Topic Gallery

    View topic image gallery

    D9068ED4-92F1-4C53-9B7E-DFF7B9EA0800.gif
    Screenshot_20200403_050216 (resized).jpg
    pasted_image (resized).png
    8296AF2C-8A0D-4952-9B44-148D983013C4.jpeg

    You're currently viewing posts by Pinsider chuckwurt.
    Click here to go back to viewing the entire thread.

    #31 4 years ago
    Quoted from dnapac:

    Agreed. But, maybe it’s time to take a step
    Back. Those that are very opinionated have seemed to take over those that truly want to
    help the hobby. It’s changed. Instead of helping out with problems, they are more interested in promoting their favorite product/company.

    Show me where this is occurring in any single tech thread or club thread.

    Stick to those only and you’ll never see the trolls again.

    1 week later
    #102 4 years ago
    D9068ED4-92F1-4C53-9B7E-DFF7B9EA0800.gifD9068ED4-92F1-4C53-9B7E-DFF7B9EA0800.gif
    #106 4 years ago

    Another suggestion for new games. I know this sounds crazy, but let the game sit for a year before you can rate it. None these games are even close to finished until then.

    I can’t even believe that there have been 117 ratings of stranger things already. It’s missing so much.

    #110 4 years ago
    Quoted from PanzerFreak:

    Yeah good idea, that does hurt game rankings. Still, if manufacturers are going to release games with very incomplete code and or mechanical / quality issues for $6k - $10k+ they deserve most of the poor reviews.

    The reviews don’t matter. Has nothing to do with the manufacturers.

    Just trying to make them better. My comment was that I can’t believe 117 people felt they could make an honest review of an incomplete game. New games are not done the same way they were in the 90s. They are constantly evolving for that first year. You have to adjust things for that if you want these rankings to be anything but a joke.

    I do like the flagging system. Bogus reviews bad or good seem to get sniffed out pretty good.

    I also think you should have to explain your rankings in at least 4 sentences. Haha

    You're currently viewing posts by Pinsider chuckwurt.
    Click here to go back to viewing the entire thread.

    Reply

    Wanna join the discussion? Please sign in to reply to this topic.

    Hey there! Welcome to Pinside!

    Donate to Pinside

    Great to see you're enjoying Pinside! Did you know Pinside is able to run without any 3rd-party banners or ads, thanks to the support from our visitors? Please consider a donation to Pinside and get anext to your username to show for it! Or better yet, subscribe to Pinside+!


    This page was printed from https://pinside.com/pinball/forum/topic/the-top-100-should-be-closef?tu=chuckwurt and we tried optimising it for printing. Some page elements may have been deliberately hidden.

    Scan the QR code on the left to jump to the URL this document was printed from.