Quoted from Lermods:Notwithstanding the fuzzy math here, how would that investor get his $2 million if he wanted out today?
The pinball community has been burned far too many times in recent years. I am not saying this company will be among those ranks, but people need to be asking a lot more questions before “investing.”
Obviously, there is no liquidity and they ain't paying you $2mm for your stock.
I'm more curious about the fuzzy math, which I assume is in reference to the statement that the person would have received 25% of $2mm taken out by the principles. The 25% would only come into play if funds were a distribution of earnings as a dividend paid to shareholders as opposed to salary. While there can be tax advantages to paying a dividend in lieu of salary, I suspect the numbers don't work out if you you only get 75 cents on the dollar due to the need to pay the dividend to this investor. Specifically, if the principles needed $2mm over those dozen years, the company would have had to pay out $2.67mm since the other investor gets $670k (25%). If the $2mm was a distribution/dividend paid over and above salary, that raises other questions. If the principles believed in the story, you would assume they would insist the $ be reinvested in the company and not distributed. (By the way, any reasonable investor would expect the principles to get paid a fair salary.)