Quoted from DCFAN:
Couldn't the credit union show what format an account holder's transaction history should look like? It sure sounds like Kevin is likely manipulating the data to make it super difficult to decipher.
I think its more of the message of 'you[kevin] are making it difficult... and its on YOU to explain this stuff'
Kevin seems to forget the bankruptcy was for HIM.. but he thought he could just play dumb and lay low and the demands would pass or something.
It seems lost on Kevin it is his responsibility to account for things.. not the other way around.
If you goto your bank, and say I need a history of my account.. I'm sure you'd get something equally inadequate. I know when PNC pulled my history... it looked just like any other spreadsheet output with a few columns.. whose each line matches closely to what you see in your bank's webpage. You see each in and out.. but details are limited. When you see 'Check 105' or 'ATM withdrawal' or 'Transfer to account XYZ' - that alone doesn't account for the history. That's what they were driving at today.
That.. and Kevin gives up his one account, but Keith highlights he was on the other account with his wife... and questioning how far back the histories went. Plus, he was pointing out the inability to verify the info on the sheets... but I think that is more about trying to press for the better info (checks, account details, etc) more than it is thinking the info presented is faked. Its much easier for the lawyer to just throw uncertainty in there and keep the pressure on for their true end game.