Quoted from DakotaMike:So as a percentage of the population affected, Spanish Flu was much worse. You have to be careful making comparisons across such vast time periods. It's not an apples to apples comparison.
Who made a percentage comparison between population of 1918 and the population today? On a percentage basis, sure the Spanish Flu was much worse. But in a absolute basis, 637,000 people dying of one disease in the U.S. is not chump change.
Here is something else, on an absolute basis:
**The number of dead during the 1918 pandemic is estimated to be as high as 100 million people the world around. So far, in the 21st Century, the number of worldwide cases is 208,656,464. And, so far, the number of deaths the world around is only 4,382,979.
---------------------------------------------------------------
OK. Now we can go back to percentages:
1918 U.S. deaths of 675,000 vs. 100 million deaths worldwide = .00675 %.
However, in today's market, the US currently has 637,000 deaths compared to 4,382,979 deaths around the world. The US represents 14.5 % of worldwide Covid 19 deaths.
So, as a percentage of world wide deaths today, especially when compared to 1918, the US has really knocked it out of the park with its 14.5% number.
That percentage puzzles me. How did we get to 14%? Are we just a bunch of overweight fat fucks who sit around watching too much TV? Were we basically a bunch of sitting ducks all lined up just waiting for Covid.
========================================
India, with 432112 dead comes in at .098 % of world wide deaths.
Brazil 569,581 dead. .129%
Mexico is about 5% of worldwide deaths.