Quoted from Utesichiban:If none of those are legitimate scientific or good news sources, I'd love to see what you consider reputable. Of course, you didn't provide any so I can only conclude you want to dodge the question and just continue on with whatever political narrative you were trying to spin to begin with.
You would most likely not have access to a vast majority of the information, not legitimately, anyway. I am not trying to make anything "political". "Politics" is a big part of the problem. Trying to put it aside is a good idea I think. I was trying to get to freedom of information, which seems limited at best.
I could show that if you like?, demonstrate, but you might not like it.
Just like with some of the realities of big pharma. Some people Wouldn't like it, or may refuse to even consider some reasoning. Reality sux in other ways than people will be able to believe sometimes. Money, and stuff, and things.
Also sometimes things are better than people can believe. I don't know too much, but when the story says 2+2=5, and some distractions thrown in... it's a reasonable time to be asking more questions. Deadly virus is very real, that is no question. Many other less obvious questions that really need asking, and they don't all have answers when they should. Also Questions sometimes that one might not even think needed to be asked?
I'm happy to help, where I can. It's kind of limited though. I am sorry. You are not alone. I am not alone... We are not alone.