both have their camps. I mean people who will defend either position.
I started owning the old games, mainly because at the time they were cheaper. But I graduated up to the A-list BW games such as TZ, IJ and they were not much cheaper than the new games.
I found I like the newer games better. Partly because I like new games that don't look like they have been played 10,000 times. For example while I like IJ and TZ better than PotC, I have kept my PotC because although it's 7-8 years old, it looks the same as the day I unboxed it. I have had it for 7-8 years but probably less than 1000 plays on it, and I have not had one thing go wrong with it.
My IJ and TZ were always tough to keep running. (Especially for me as I am not a fix it myself guy).
I have Tron zero issues, STLE zero issues.
I had owned CFTBL for quite a while, sold it but missed it so got one back a year latter. In that time, I had been playing Tron, XM, ACDC premium. When I got the CFTBL back, I was shocked to realize that I didn't like it any more. It was the same game, but I was bored with the way it played.
I played Congo, a game some people rave about, and found it not to my liking. Even with it being half the cost of a SM. I would rather have SM any day.
Just my view. But I am 100% Stern and plan on getting more new games (as opposed to used old games in the future).
It is a minor point, but to me, I think it's also good for the hobby to have people buying NIB games as we are supporting Stern or JJP or Skit-B (etc.) and will be the source of future 'used' games down the road. If all people went away from NIB games, possibly Stern would have gone under and we might not have had such games as Tron, AcDc, ST which I think can stand toe to toe with older classic games.
I had a TOTAN and while it was very nice looking and highly regarded, I'd take a Tron or SM to own.