There has been a lot of debating who is telling the truth, DP or ARA.
There are people like me who take the site of DP (and yep, can be accused of over optimism ) and the definite nay-sayers. A lot of discussion is going on where in reality it is all theorizing as we all (me included) haven;t seen proof from DP to support their side of the story. Is DP or ARA to blame or …. I have chosen DP-site as you all know. Not just because I am Dutch like them but because I have had many discussions with DP, especially Barry, and my antennas tell me they are telling the truth. This FWIW to you.
Please do note that this in my book doesn’t mean that they are not responsible, hell they are. I bought with them, not ARA. However, I don’t find them guilty which, in my book at least, makes a hell of a difference.
So, what’s new here? Above has been mentioned before. What I can share now is finally (some) proof of the story behind DP and call-out ARA on a flat lie. Till now DP couldn’t share this info on paper with me but their lawyer finally approved it so here we go.
Remember the letter from ARA telling they haven’t increased their pricing? See attachment. See also attached email correspondence from Jaap DP on this point. As its in Dutch I will translate for you.
Email Jaap 28-6-2016
Hello Rene,
Why are we in business? That was 1 of the many questions I asked you yesterday and I hope to have made clear why we want to go ahead with ARA. But of course its all about the money. So I come here with back to you in regard to your proposal to raise price from € … to € …. For TBL01 till TNL100. What I note is you make a different cost calculation as in your previous proposal. You propose to use standard calculation for TBL101 till TBL300. What kind of calculation do you mean here?
In principal we agree with this higher price if you make sure that the number of boxed machines (eg on a pallet) is realized to compensate us for our losses. This in our mutual interest as you know (this is why we are in business). According to my calculation this would mean 350 machines of which 300 TBL and 50 BoP (the 2nd project). You told us you would be willing to spent a hour of calculation on this. I love to hear where your calculation results to and how you want to realize this with us.
I hope to have conveyed our passion for this and that you can apply MLR (note from Rens: MLR is a kind of game they do at the Open Circle Academy). And I am happy to invite you to next’s time Open Circle Academy
Regards, Jaap
ps: in your general conditions there is payment term of 30 days. I would like to hear from you how you are going to apply this in relation to the prefinancing of ARA as you know our financial situation via the reports from the accountant.
One day later on 29-6-2016 Rene answers:
Hello Jaap,
We go for it with our whole heart. Let’s go bowling
As agreed:
Price #1-#100 fixed, #101-#300 dependable on coming developments. Low costs version to be considered for >#200
-#300 to be delivered in 2016
BoP2.0 start deliveries in 2016, minimum 50 pcs.
Steps are taken to increase production capacity considerably after the summer holiday
Place orders in system and take care of documents.
Sort out the payments
Best regards,
Rene Versteeg
Director ARA
So this clearly shows a price change in June 2016 (an increasement even). This were ARA in February 2017 tells pricing has never changed! Remember production was supposed to have started in 2015 and we see here a debate on a price change in June 2016. So the letter of ARA was clearly a lie.
Also you see clearly that ARA has committed to a production level in 2016 and stated they will order the parts required. In October 2016 DP however had to note that by far the promised 300 TBLs wouldn’t be met. Parts for BoP20 were not even ordered!! So no way that the ARA commitment would be kept. Original contract stated 2015 deliveries, so they were already a year overdue.
This was the moment that DP had to stop with ARA seeing so many agreements broken.
And given them 51% of the shares of DP which was their idea in 2017, do you really think this is a company who would use this majority of the shares to get everybody our pinball? For sure not, they would use this majority to sell off the manufactured TBL’s to the highest bidder and close DP. Yes, that would give them a bad rep in pinballcountry but ARA being a Dutch company not into pinball, does that really hurt them? And remember, this was all needed because they didn’t do what they themselves agreed to !
So why this on Pinside? DP themselves is not on Pinside like many more manufacturers. I watch the thread and sometimes consult them where possible (this without drawing a salary by the way ). And here are the most disbelievers. So I got permission to post this.
Of course there will still be nay-sayers which is their right. EA’s have 8500 reasons to be upset, just point your anger to the right person which I sincerely believe is ARA. And again, I hold DP responsible, just not guilty.
So our best hopes are still that DP wins against ARA. This is just part of the proof they have. If we could divert the negative energy to more productive thinking this could help us (EA) all. If they win we all win. If they go bankrupt prior to the court case (which I think is ARA’s plan) we loose all.
Gofundsme or us EA perhaps ‘coughing up more money” (but than in a secure way which means money can only be used to built TBLs and will only be freed to DP once TBLs are delivered) or …..??
Look forward to your thoughts on this. Pls just make it productive. Critic is more than welcome, just well-funded please. Screaming where is my f*cking TBL doesn’t help unfortunately, wish it was that easy
I hope that I can leave my flamesuite at home this time
DP_Emails (resized).jpgIMG_5820 (resized).JPG