I don’t get it. Beatles is a dream theme for people. I have hundreds of hours in on Beatles research for various projects. I am AMAZED that this is what Stern is showing.
From a marketing standpoint- they used very feminine colors. I get the scheme is accurate for 1964 BUT it looks like a teenage girl’s fan magazine for the Beatles.
From a marketing standpoint- most pinball buyers are male, right? Not being sexist- just pure demographics. Most male Beatles fans I know of acknowledge the early years- but if they have memorabilia or photos from the early years- it doesn’t look like this. It’s stuff from the cavern club. It’s Hard Days Night stills. Usually harder edged and Black and White.
More to the point- most male Beatles fans I know focus on Sgt. Peppers, Magical Mystery Tour, Yellow Submarine, White Album, Revolver, Rubber Soul, and Abbey Road.
So much interesting stuff going on in that era. For a pin that is presumed to be home use only (no coin door- no routing— not to mention the prices are probably too high to let it get slammed around) it doesn’t seem very deep. Not a ton to do on the play field. The spinning disc is interesting but it’s not super innovative. Nothing in the layout to make me want to buy.
For years I imagined a deep game where you work your way through the albums- or famous concerts and performances- with art to match the amazing album artwork we would spend hours studying looking for clues to the Paul Is Dead Mystery. I halfway hoped there would be references to the weird stuff hidden on albums.
If they paid $500 per pin for the license, I don’t understand why they only have a few songs from one era when Rock Band had stuff from every era.
I really am not the guy to come on here and bitch. I’m not normally yelling “Attica! Attica!” I think Franchi is a talented artist. Incredibly so. He was hampered by the way Stern went on this pin.
I would buy a Seawitch reissue. Because it’s Seawitch. Older style games are fine if they’re vintage or cool. I’d buy a Big Shot or a Strikes and Spares reissue. I don’t want a Beatles that isn’t amazing and a Seawitch that isn’t Seawitch.
I feel like this doesn’t work in the art era of Iron Maiden, Deadpool and even Alice Cooper. I think people expect more from a AAA, 5 star, million dollar license. I felt that way with Star Wars too. Another pin that I was afraid I was just going to HAVE to buy when it came out. I know people hear ‘world under glass’ and some just get mad because of association- but that pin WAS missing what I was looking for. I know a lot of people enjoy the way it shoots. It’s a good Ritchie pin. But it didn’t have a carbonite chamber with a frozen Han Solo that would pop up. It didn’t have ‘use the force’ magnets. It didn’t have an ecto- goggles style Spirit of Obi-Wan or Hologram Leia. It didn’t have a Jabba’s throne that slid back to reveal a Rancor monster lower playfield.
Now- I know that all sounds like crazy, over the top stuff- but in this era, for these prices, for the AAA, 5 star licenses- the ones we’ve wanted done a certain way for decades- Star Wars disappointed.
Batman 66’ disappointed initially- but Lyman was able to save it with code.
I don’t think code will save the Beatles. There is no ‘Beatles world under glass.’ I feel like they missed the essence of the Beatles and what they represent to the biggest demographic of pinball buyers.
If Stern is handcuffed by what they can do (as rumored with Star Wars art and now questionable with regards to The Beatles) with a big license- I’d rather see them do amazing things with a cheaper license than disappointing things with a legendary license.
Long story short? I’m saving money.