Quoted from PanzerFreak:

For $6k -$9k+ these games should have a lot of licensed assets. A

Quoted from cooked71:

For the snowflakes, this is in no way a criticism of the layout, but it is like a mirrored TFTC. That's a good thing as I like TFTC.
[quoted image]

Quoted from Whysnow:

Pro is always less headache.
Have tried the Prem for route and regretted it every time.

Quoted from Darscot:

I thought you were an older guy its actually Howdy Doody.

Quoted from Darscot:

Sorry man, I didn't realize how old Howdy Doody was, just thought of it as before my time and that you seemed older than me and I'm almost 50.

Quoted from yancy:

Do any of you fuckin’ nerds actually play pinball.

Quoted from kell:

Define "worst"?

Quoted from flashinstinct:

I'd take a TMNT over a Black Knight

Quoted from DakotaMike:

So by worst, you mean least appealing to you personally?

Quoted from Eskaybee:

I will say this though; one of my biggest concerns about the game, which may be the reason I end up not getting one, is they appear to be spending a lot of resources on multiplayer. Being an older guy (44) with young kids, It's probably been 2+years since I sat down with some pinheads and enjoyed multiplayer games.

Quoted from erak:

I would be interested if it had something new to offer. So far not that impressed. Just seems more of the same.

Quoted from PinMonk:

They promised an "exciting gameplay experience" which Munsters is not. It's about as dull, repetitive and shallow as they come. When CASUALS at locations hate it in droves, that's a problem. Sitting right next to an Attack from Mars, which probably has LESS code, the AfM DESTROYED it in earnings, even the first week at the location I helped with.

Quoted from Thunderbird:

Fully agreed, no game will sell if you tell everyone upfront it’s going to be simple and you’ll only get a few meaningful code updates. The OP that said we have no one to blame but ourselves is sucking up to Dwight and Stern. If that’s the case, we should all stop buying all unfinished games, till a year later, when they’re actually completed code wise and Stern can kiss LE sales goodbye. Because we all know when the hype simmers down, so do the sales.
Stern creates expectations by past patterns code update wise. Hence the reason we’re willing to buy unfinished games. It is reasonable to assume based on past production, that code will greatly improve. Do you think for one second if Keith Elwin would have been on Munsters that he would let the code be so simple and shallow as Munsters? Not a chance!
Lol, using a Beatles Boutique game as an example that cost more., come on OP, get real. Completely irrelevant, since it is not a cornerstone game like Munsters. The examples I used of deep well coded games, were all apples to apples comparisons, of other equally priced cornerstone games. We all know what they were trying to achieve with Beatles upfront. Take a good look at sales numbers on that one. It was dismal to say the least. It cost Stern more in reputation than the tiny profit made. Would think they’d not have done that one, if they knew how bad the outcome would be sales and reputation wise.

Quoted from PinMonk:

Meh. Iron Man is a FUN, abusive short ride you want to do again and again, and the market finally caught up with it. Beatles is just sort of there. If prices go up on Beatles eventually, it will be from fans of the band (who are also dying off at an alarming rate, so...) who don't mind having a pin with a 1960's girl's lunchbox color scheme and not because it's an awesome hidden gem of a game.