You're currently viewing posts by Pinsider sneakerpin.
Click here to go back to viewing the entire thread.
The ranking system needs to add weighting...
SCENARIO:
Ooooh Ahhhh a shiny new pinball machine comes out, 20 people play it, it's the most AMAZING (new) pinball, EVER... now 15 rank it as all 9's and 5 review it. Great. Now it's the number 5 pinball of ALL TIME...
Come on, man.
Am I wrong with where I'm going here?
If a table has 400 rankings of 8.5 average, it should rank higher than 20 of 9, simply because people actually PLAY the older machine!
End of rant
Oh, and one more thing, these LE/PRO rankings are KILLING the top 100
At the very least, let's have a control widget to merge the multi-version tables into one. That way, the user can decide whether or not if they want to see 15 extra spots in the precious top 100 being taken up by nearly the EXACT SAME machine, save the extra music, shaker motor or EPROM code modification...
You're currently viewing posts by Pinsider sneakerpin.
Click here to go back to viewing the entire thread.
Wanna join the discussion? Please sign in to reply to this topic.
Great to see you're enjoying Pinside! Did you know Pinside is able to run without any 3rd-party banners or ads, thanks to the support from our visitors? Please consider a donation to Pinside and get anext to your username to show for it! Or better yet, subscribe to Pinside+!
This page was printed from https://pinside.com/pinball/forum/topic/suggestions-for-new-ranking-system?tu=sneakerpin and we tried optimising it for printing. Some page elements may have been deliberately hidden.
Scan the QR code on the left to jump to the URL this document was printed from.
Somersworth, NH
