Quoted from cooked71:on the pricing argument, I really question the notion that Stern are overpricing NIB games. How many competitors have been able to enter the market and successfully undercut them? Recent history is littered with companies who thought they could do it better and cheaper, but have failed. Chinese production aside, you might be able to do it better, but definitely not cheaper. NIB pricing is the way it is because that's what it costs to produce AND make a profit from an incredibly niche product that is very complicated to build, and is by definition still mostly "analogue" in nature.
You can argue that at current prices you can't justify or afford NIB games, but you can't argue Stern's mission is to fleece the market. I'm sure their mission is to be a profitable and sustainable pinball manufacturer. The 2 "competitors" have a long way to go to prove they are either profitable or sustainable.
Agreed!
Profits = the business goes on and grows, new pinball machines keep getting designed and built, new people buy their first machine, and pinball playing increases around the world
Losses = the business goes under, hundreds of people lose their jobs, Stern stops making new machines, and pinball playing takes a dive around the world.
I would rather the Stern profits scenario, because that's good for pinball overall. Having other competitors around is also good as that helps to keep Stern honest and tight with pricing.
Anyone out there think Stern is making super or unreasonable profits? If they were printing money dozens of other manufacturers would be popping up to also make easy money, just like in most other business ventures. The fact is, however, it's not easy making money out of pinball. So long as someone is making some money, and expanding, pinball has a future.
Unknown-1 (resized).jpeg