Of course ROI matters. For the guy presenting the 100% depreciation argument, he’s simply suggesting ‘would you buy that pin if tomorrow its cash value was $0?’ I suspect the answer for most of us would be ‘no’ most of the time, and that is proof that residual value matters (most of the time).
We probably all have different thresholds. Maybe some of you feel the first 20% depreciation doesn’t matter at all and appreciation is ‘icing on the cake’ — this I could believe. Others want to make money on every purchase/resale or even “flip” pins. Either way: ROI matters to you.
I bought first pin in 2018 as gift for my wife who told me once she preferred pinball over video games (I had virtually 0% experience with pinball at that time). I had no idea at that point that these retained value, so I wasn’t thinking ROI at all. Now we have -30 pins…mostly because: 1) we love everything about the hobby, and 2) since 2018 they’ve held or increased in value. If bullet point 2 wasn’t true…we’d need to rethink and set an annual ‘spend allowance’ so we’re not throwing away $10k’s in pinball depreciation every year.
…and with all that said, we were day 1 purchasers of both HW and SD (sadly missed R&M). We’ve decided that Spooky is a company we’re willing to get behind even if the games depreciate a bit. Love their enthusiasm, love their innovation, love their community interaction (here and at shows), love their service support.