(Topic ID: 326692)

Sorta surprising we haven't reinvented the pop bumper yet

By Doctor6

1 year ago


Topic Heartbeat

Topic Stats

  • 121 posts
  • 43 Pinsiders participating
  • Latest reply 1 year ago by ForceFlow
  • Topic is favorited by 1 Pinsider

You

Linked Games

No games have been linked to this topic.

    Topic Gallery

    View topic image gallery

    wait-a-minute-393x295.jpg
    pasted_image (resized).png
    Orb 1 (resized).jpg
    spoon (resized).png
    pasted_image (resized).png
    Resized_16699221109967716534641397945293_385163287893037 (resized).jpeg
    Screenshot_20221201-113217~3 (resized).png
    DCEE060B-9996-4A0B-9391-97161EAC1232 (resized).jpeg
    839CC34D-220C-4DF0-A2C2-4ED24AB4DF92 (resized).jpeg
    785AC2E3-B959-427D-A026-8284B145A359 (resized).jpeg
    317012225_2384303311724983_2093093265482063090_n (resized).jpg

    You're currently viewing posts by Pinsider pete_d.
    Click here to go back to viewing the entire thread.

    #4 1 year ago
    Quoted from Doctor6:

    less prone to need to be tweaked.

    Magnetic switches can be really finicky. Get them dialed in, and they're fine. But they need a lot of fine-tuning. And they can be limited in terms of application, because of potential for interference with other nearby parts.

    I feel like the current pop bumper design actually works really well. There are still lots of places mechanical switches show up on pinball machines, and they are fine. "If it ain't broke, don't fix it" seems perfectly applicable in the case of the pop bumpers. Pinball machines are expensive enough these days, without having to pay for all the extra R&D plus manufacturing costs that fancier switches would entail.

    #80 1 year ago
    Quoted from CrazyLevi:

    It does!!!
    But again...so what? The latches work fine, and seem less prone to breakage, and have a much more satisfying "snap" than some sloppy spring loaded lockdown mech. Though, I guess we'll find out in 20 years or so! Haven't heard of any latch failures yet and they've been using them for 10 years.

    I agree, for the most part. I like some of the changes, like the power switch's new location, and the latch for the lockbar seems fine to me too.

    But it does have the disadvantage that it's possible to close the coin door without securing the lockbox now. I haven't made that mistake yet, but I can't say for 100% that I would never. I see some merit in mechanical designs that force the user into the right sequence of operations.

    You're currently viewing posts by Pinsider pete_d.
    Click here to go back to viewing the entire thread.

    Reply

    Wanna join the discussion? Please sign in to reply to this topic.

    Hey there! Welcome to Pinside!

    Donate to Pinside

    Great to see you're enjoying Pinside! Did you know Pinside is able to run without any 3rd-party banners or ads, thanks to the support from our visitors? Please consider a donation to Pinside and get anext to your username to show for it! Or better yet, subscribe to Pinside+!


    This page was printed from https://pinside.com/pinball/forum/topic/sorta-surprising-we-haven-t-reinvented-the-pop-bumper-yet?tu=pete_d and we tried optimising it for printing. Some page elements may have been deliberately hidden.

    Scan the QR code on the left to jump to the URL this document was printed from.