(Topic ID: 251767)

So, UFO's are real now.

By Luckydogg420

4 years ago


Topic Heartbeat

Topic Stats

  • 2,566 posts
  • 235 Pinsiders participating
  • Latest reply 4 days ago by RonSS
  • Topic is favorited by 42 Pinsiders

You

Linked Games

No games have been linked to this topic.

    Topic Gallery

    View topic image gallery

    Screenshot_20240414_120219_Facebook (resized).jpg
    DC (resized).png
    IMG_2075 (resized).jpeg
    IMG_20240310_160206.jpg
    Screenshot 2024-03-10 at 12.28.08?PM (resized).png
    2b95d0d0677e2ab3d241e767e9efc95c (resized).jpg
    7ec9c794e441959a3bfdd28b9f54e4c2 (resized).jpg
    IMG_1956 (resized).jpeg
    IMG_1956 (resized).jpeg
    skynews-stonehenge-monument_4583271.jpg
    71901805018__8D280B0F-5374-4172-A7E1-23B1A2BFF38E (resized).jpeg
    IMG_0053 (resized).jpeg
    300k (resized).png
    IMG_1843 (resized).jpeg
    IMG_6755 (resized).png
    a7qmZDA_460s (resized).jpg

    You're currently viewing posts by Pinsider jmcdonald.
    Click here to go back to viewing the entire thread.

    10
    #547 2 years ago
    Quoted from kvan99:

    No such thing as (Alien) UFOs.....no amount of grainy video can change that. Carl Sagan already told us how much energy is needed for an object to travel at the speed of light (unfathomable amount for our little brains) Alpha Centauri is the closest star system, it will takes over a 100 yrs to get there...no life detected, after that were talking much, much further distances. Which means the aliens would have to travel 1000 or 10,000 years just to come check out our sorry asses. Just too much.

    I'm blown away by the amount of denial here. People, wake up. We're in a "process" of a massive revelation. The GOVERNMENT just admitted UFO's are REAL. They are physical MACHINES with technology "at least 100 to 1000 years ahead of us". They are INTELLIGENT (these are the pilots and witnesses own words for describing how they move). There is zero chance of some innocent explanation.

    Barack Obama himself even went on James Corden Monday night and confirmed "these machines and these stories are real and I'm being absolutely serious." I know the government has been doing a fantastic job for decades to convince everyone to call people nuts for believing in UFO's but they can no longer keep it a secret and they KNOW they must slowly allow this acceptance to grow in people's minds.

    AND PEOPLE .. for the love of GOD, the government absolutely has high-resolution video and photos. They only provide grainy video to allow a slim amount of deniability in your mind so you don't go into shock. Evidence of this?? YES ... in the one video of the "sphere" that splashes into the ocean (confirmed authentic by the Navy) ... more than one Navy person all at once scream "it splashed". However, can you see a splash in the video? No. But, those Navy personnel were staring at monitors ... that clearly must have had high resolution (they were not standing out on the deck of the ship.) So, do you really think the Navy records video on an old VHS VCR?? No, of course not. They downgraded the video so not to cause a complete panic. They're slowly working this new revelation into people's minds.

    #549 2 years ago
    Quoted from Wolfanoz:

    Think of it like this.... our pilots are seeing these things literally daily. Watched that 60 minutes report when a pilot mentioned he's seen one or many daily as of the past two years..
    You're not hearing China or Russia report on them as much. It's not unlikely to think this is our tech (whether derived from actual alien technology) testing our pilots with it under extra secrecy. We're typically 20-30 years ahead militarily than everyone else anyway. If they wanted to invade, most likely we'd all be ash by now.

    I think this is precisely the thinking of someone in denial (to think it's just American tech if even reverse-engineered). Pilots are highly intelligent people. When they say (literally) that they do not believe any human beings on Earth possesses the technology or intelligence they witnessed firsthand and it was at least 100-1000 years ahead of us, they are telling the truth. We cannot reverse engineer something that far ahead of us. We have our limits. You could not hand an iPhone to people living 1000 years ago and say, go ahead, reverse engineer it. They wouldn't know where to begin with such advanced technology. We're smart but we have limits and my guess is trying to understand anti-gravity, anti-inertia capabilities is beyond our limit currently.
    BTW, if our government HAS been witnessing these "intelligent" moving unidenfitfied advanced machines for decades (that they now admit they see basically daily) ... do you not think they've attempted contact and communication?
    And yes, if they wanted to kill us they could do it in an instant. But there is plenty of anectdotal evidence that they are friendly and are more interested in saving us from ourselves. You'll note, they are highly inquisitive of our most advanced military crafts/ships/weapons.
    AND ... there isn't just one species visiting us. Likely dozens. I know, it's a lot to take in.

    #553 2 years ago

    And the patent for anti-inertia to withstand 600 G's? And the patent for a trans-medium craft (going from air directly into sea in the blink of an eye)? And for silent, even invisible propulsion that can go 13,000 MPH? And the patent for remotely pre-determining the destination point of a craft you're shadowing? (It was observed the "machine" somehow knew the CAP point of these jets in advance.) Sure, it's all just DARPA and we're SO far ahead of every other country. Come on. Our government is trying to tell you the truth ... there are machines we see daily that we cannot explain. If you cannot connect the dots, don't worry, there will be more and more revelations (the next being the Congressional report due out next month) and eventually the truth will be undeniable and staring you in your face (possibly literally). You might want to open your mind to the possibility we're most certainly not alone which, given the size of the Universe much less our galaxy alone, really should not be all that surprising. We literally never had direct evidence of another planet outside of our solar system until 1988. Since then we've discovered thousands of planets including plenty that are high candidates for being Earth-like and capable of supporting life. We're not as special as we thought. Shocker.

    #556 2 years ago
    Quoted from embryonjohn:

    No.
    They are not real.

    lol. The United States government literally just told you they are real (including former President Barack Obama himself) but you insist they are not? The government must be hiding some DARPA project even though the government is apparently testing these DARPA craft on our own military and allowing those military personnel to speak publicly?? Makes a lot of sense.
    Our reality has been (and continues to be) so ignorant it's astonishing. I fear those incapable of even entertaining the thought we're far from alone are precisely the ones who will die of a heart attack when "they" reveal themselves en masse.

    #568 2 years ago
    Quoted from DanQverymuch:

    I have to laugh at the idea that tech can keep progressing for billions of years at the rate it has for us over the last hundred.
    Obama said the govt does NOT have a stash of aliens and captured spacecraft, and that there are sightings we have not explained. So, what else is new? He also said Reggie Watts might be an alien behind those glasses, and that he enjoyed seeing his daughters during lockdown.
    Here, get a grip:
    https://www.skeptic.com/reading_room/did-us-government-say-ufos-are-real-an-analysis-of-60-minutes-investigation/

    Here is what is new ... the government is admitting these "machines" are real, that they display technology "at least 100 to 1000 years ahead of us", seem "aware of us", invade our airspace regularly and with impunity, and we don't know what they are. That's pretty "new". IMO Obama appeared almost taken aback by Reggie's laughing and the crowd's reaction which is why he then said " ... but I'm being absolutely serious here folks, ... ". He was literally trying to tell people what was reported on 60 Minutes is REAL. There are not innocent explanations for these "machines" (the pilots and others own word they repeatedly used.) They are exhibiting technology far beyond what humans are capable of and pretending "maybe it's just another DARPA project" is not a potential explanation.

    So of course the government is not going to reveal all that they know at once. There are plenty of people who could not handle the shock and revelation. A mass panic could easily be a threat to our economy, society, and way of life. So of course Obama's not going to reveal whether we've made contact and other major revelations. Obama even said on that show that there are things he cannot reveal. The government has to let society's minds slowly open up to the idea that we're not alone which is why they're not (yet) showing you the high-resolution photos and videos (or radar tracking information for that matter) that they have.

    BTW, Lou Elizondo dropped another bombshell when he confirmed "The United States is in possession of exotic material, and I'll leave it at that ...". These are major revelations with no innocent explanations. Start opening your mind to jaw-dropping possibilities. Next month's Congressional report will have more bombshells.

    #571 2 years ago
    Quoted from gliebig:

    If military pilots are seeing them so frequently, where are all the witness accounts from the millions of people on daily passenger flights with window seats?
    ...and armed with quality cell phone cameras.

    I fly way too frequently. I've never even saw much less caught a fighter jet of any kind (especially a Stealth fighter) on video while flying but I have high confidence they do really exist.

    The military is witnessing them most frequently because they are the ones worth studying.

    #573 2 years ago
    Quoted from kvan99:

    Where did you see this? Which machines are displaying these techs? Proof is a beautiful thing.

    In the '60 Minutes' episode they interviewed 2 of the 4 pilots (one of whom is a Top Gun graduate) who witnessed the 'tic tac' machine firsthand in 2004 (off the West coast) and they described these inexplicable behaviors of the craft which they observed for about 5 minutes before it took off and "disappeared" in the blink of an eye. These are some highly credible sources and not Jim Bob from Kentucky describing what he saw after drinking a 6-pack at the campfire.
    Another pilot on the same episode also described seeing 'machines' that displayed these characteristics and they have been seeing them on a "near-daily basis for years off the East Coast". He also made the comment about them invading our airspace with impunity.
    “Lue” Elizondo the former director of the Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program (ATTIP), has given several interviews over the past couple weeks and confirmed the multiple sources all describing the same behaviors and they have a ton of documentation the public has never seen. He later confirmed in an interview with Tucker Carlson on Fox News, when asked if the U.S had ever captured alien craft and he replied "The U.S is in possession of exotic material ... I'll leave it at that".
    President Obama, when asked about the '60 Minutes' revelations on Monday's episode of James Corden confirmed the incidents are real and simply that we are seeing machines we cannot explain. He also added there is a lot more he cannot reveal.
    So the government has gone from consistently denying 100%, any knowledge of UFO's and not allowing military personel to speak on the record to all of a sudden confirming these things are real, they are unexplainable, and allowing military personel to speak on the record.
    They have been laying the groundwork for next month's Congressional report which multiple government sources have said will contain some bombshells and that members of Congress will likely hear even more than what the public will see in the official report.

    #579 2 years ago
    Quoted from kvan99:

    No, no it's Martians taking a shortcut through the Milky way

    You're not listening. Perhaps you should watch the show for yourself. These pilots witnessed this machine FIRSTHAND with their own eyes. Not through some monitor or lense. They are highly trained at identifying aircraft from all over the world. They described the experience in detail. No visible sign of propulsion. No wings. Could hover in place. "Roiled the ocean water beneath it when they first encountered it". "Clearly knew they were there" and reacted to their movements (even reaching their CAP point ahead of them). Traveled supersonic speeds with no sonic boom against the wind and making 90 degree turn on a dime. All 4 of them saw the same thing and observed it for roughly 5 minutes before it disappeared. Why would they lie? And why have so many others described seeing a similar "tic tac" shaped UFO over the past several decades?

    I know this is an extremely heavy revelation. There is no innocent explanation. I suggest you try and have an open mind and entertain the thought that we're really not the smartest species in the universe much less our own galaxy. Just look at recent research on muons which seems to suggest there is plenty we do not yet know or understand about physics.

    10
    #597 2 years ago
    Quoted from kvan99: At this point the pilots said they speculated that the objects were part of some classified and extremely advanced drone program.

    More pilots who couldn't explain what they were seeing so they "assumed it was someting highly advanced" of ours?
    I'm not sure how this debunks anything the government is now telling us?? Sounds like more affirmation to me.

    But if you wish to remain closed-minded and ignore what the government is now (finally) slooooowly trying to tell you, that's fine.

    It's simply a fact that there is just SO much we do not know. We don't even really understand gravity, a basic force (so how could we even attempt to devise an anti-gravity device much less understand one we're looking at?). We have never been able to reconcile Relativity and Quantum Mechanics for decades on end. A recent study on muons concluded there is now "strong evidence" for a "new force of nature" never known.
    https://www.nytimes.com/2021/04/07/science/particle-physics-muon-fermilab-brookhaven.html

    BTW, some fun facts on how "smart" we currently are. We had zero hard evidence of any exoplanets until 1988. Zero. To this day, we're not certain of the number of planets in our OWN solar system and suspect a hypothetical "Planet 9" really is out there. We are currently aware of 63 stars within 5 parsecs or 16.3 light years of Earth (but scientists suspect there are many, many more yet to be discovered.) Of those 63 stars we have only begun discovering the major planets orbiting those suns. Again, there are likely "hundreds" more yet to be discovered on those known stars alone. The vast majority of these discoveries have come in just the last two decades. Scientists have repeatedly revised (upward) their estimated number of stars in our galaxy as well as the number of planets orbiting them. It's staggering. To think we are alone or to even think no species is out there with far superior knowledge seems incredibly naive and arrogant IMO.

    It's becoming all too clear, right now in my lifetime, that the odds are quickly tilting toward "we're not alone" and the government is now strongly hinting at that conclusion.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_nearest_stars_and_brown_dwarfs

    #604 2 years ago
    Quoted from John_I:

    Hopefully you live many more decades and will not be disappointed when this doesn't happen. We might prove life elsewhere in our lifetimes, because it certainly exists possibly in our own solar system. On the other hand we are not being visited.

    I'd happily take any bet. 99% confident (most people just aren't paying attention to what has been happening). The government will be releasing increasingly more detailed video and photos (and information) in the coming years. They now know they can no longer maintain the secret given advancements in technology and the speed at which information travels. We're in a "process" (to avoid mass panic) of revelation. Not that I think there is anything to fear whatsoever.

    #639 2 years ago
    Quoted from kvan99:

    See there is difference, the difference is you "think" or you "Feel" that's not proof....none of you have solid proof of aliens, yet there is ample scientific data that is dismissed (SETI) in favor of what some pilot thought he saw on his radar. Besides why jump to conclusions and call UFOs alien visitors? It could be one of the many secret project the military is working on. Science is beautiful thing.....facts are even prettier, but in short supply in this forum....I mean now you're discussing ghosts?

    I guess I've always been very good at connecting the dots.
    The only time I said "think" (above) is when stating I don't believe we have anything to fear (if extraterristial life wanted to exterminate us they could, but we're still here). Here are the facts, however.
    - "Somehow" a UFO military video first leaked to the public starting in 2007.
    - In 2019 an additional 2 military videos "leaked" to the public
    - In 2020 the Pentagon officially declassified the 3 videos and confirmed they were authentic and reamined unexplained although an investigation continued
    - Also in December 2020, Trump snuck into a Covid Bill that the Pentagon had a 180-day countdown to compile a full report for Congress
    - In 2021 (just over a week ago) in a 60 Minutes bombshell, military personnel (2 highly-credible Navy pilots) were allowed to speak on record about the 2004 incident and what they witnessed with their own eyes (NOT via camera or monitor) a "UAP with technology at least 100 to 1000 years ahead of us". Another active pilot confirmed they see these "machines" on a near-daily basis "invading our airspace with impunity".
    - Two days later, on James Corden, former President Barack Obama confirms "... I'm being serious now, these ..." these are real physical machines and "we don't know exactly what they are".

    These are facts now. How do you not see the "red flag" that there has been a MAJOR shift in policy regarding UFO's? For decades the Pentagon has refused to acknowledge them, has refused to allow military personnell to even speak about them. Something has very clearly changed.
    Presidents and highly intelligent military personell do not make outlandish claims without considering all possibilities. They are flat out trying to tell you these things are real and are here and have technology way beyond our own and we cannot explain them. Period.

    #640 2 years ago
    Quoted from chad:

    Regular camera versus infrared camera. This is somewhat long video.

    That's hands down the most condescending, ignorant/juvenile, and asinine response I've seen yet. How shocking it managed to divulge into a Fox News tantrum more than anything else. For him to joke about the IQ of fighter pilots (much less one who has graduated Top Gun) is pretty damn insulting. I'm highly confident they would not mistake a duck (100+ miles out at sea) for something inexplicable. Plus, the 2004 incident in particular, FOUR pilots .. not one .. all confirming the same description of 5 minutes of observation with their OWN EYES. Not just cameras and radar. And ONCE AGAIN ... you damn well better believe they have high-definition video and photos!! Did you really think the government was going to hit you all at once with everything they have and know?? I think that speaks to your IQ, not theirs. Think about how serious these revelations are. Even if you don't believe it in the slightest (fine), surely you have to acknowledge that if the government did have strong PROOF that they would have to find a way to slowly break the news to the public if/when they concluded they could not keep it a secret forever, no?? HOW would you break the news to the public?? I'm thinking a years-long process is in order and releasing downgraded imagery and video is part of the early steps.

    #674 2 years ago
    Quoted from TRAMD:

    The chance that any of that alien-to-Earth intelligent life has visited this planet is ridiculously low. So low that it is laughable to consider it a possibility. While there are planets within a dozen light years from us that could harbor life, most of them will not have intelligent life living on them, let alone life that is far more advanced than we are.

    People. My 2 cents again, but humble yourselves. We're not as bright as you think. You can't fathom where our knowledge will be in 500 years or how little we know now compared to what we'll know then. Again, we can't even reconcile Relativity and Quantum Mechanics. We don't even understand gravity (we can predict gravitational force of objects, but we don't really understand how gravity itself works). Recent study of muons says "WOW", there is something weird going on and this could lead to the biggest breakthroughs in physics ever. I have little doubt we'll discover a feasible method of faster-than-light travel (some bending of space/time using an energy source we're yet to discover) some time in the future and traveling to other stars will become possible. In fact, go look up the proposed "The Alcubierre drive" (it's fascinating idea in itself). Yes, we'll need to solve the power problem but the fact that we're already proposing solutions tells me we could very possibly solve this within 500 years or less.
    Now, you're wrong on how many stars we've found to date (in reference to "ThatOneDude"'s comment). We now know of 63 stars within just 5 parsecs of Earth (just 16.3 light years). There are FAR more within 100 light years. Keep in mind, V = 4/3(pie)r(cubed.) The further away from Earth the Volume of space for stars/planets to exist goes up exponentially. We've only discovered most of these in the last couple decades. Worse, scientists absolutely believe there are many more within this distance yet to be discovered, each possibly hosting numerous planets. As Ben Heck noted above, we've barely begun to discover the true number of planets orbiting these stars as currently our methods are only sensitive enough to detect the largest planets and even then they have to traverse within the plane of visibility to us passing in front of the sun they orbit. We have no clue if the average number of planets around a star is 8 (like us) or 20. WORSE YET ... How many moons orbit those planets that are just as likely as being capable of (or increasingly likely in some cases) hosting life? We have not yet confirmed a single exomoon(!!) although Kepler has identified a couple of possible candidates (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exomoon) Jupiter and Saturn alone have a combined 161 known moons!! We can't even figure out if there is life on Europa and/or Enceladus here in our own solar system but we suspect there may well be!
    NOW, consider this ... any advanced civilization won't just have mastered faster-than-light travel (which BTW, if the ship is bending space itself in front it, won't have to worry about the inertia of any asteroid as it will bend space around them), they would have some equally major advances in healthcare and extending life and could likely live hundreds of years (heck, we have life forms here on Earth that can live hundreds of years on their own right now without science). So, if they could make a trip to Earth at 10-20 times the speed light ... hmm, maybe that's not such a bad trip for them if they're within 100-150 light years? Now, we don't really know how many stars there may actually be within 100-150 light-years but I'll go with Ben Heck's estimation ... "a lot".
    For the curious ... Red Dwarf stars in particular are incredibly hard to detect and we believe they account for 3/4 of all the stars in our galaxy. There could easily be dozens more of these within 5 parsecs of Earth.
    https://www.enchantedlearning.com/subjects/astronomy/stars/startypes.shtml
    #TheyreHere

    #678 2 years ago
    Quoted from TRAMD:

    This seems like a contradiction.

    Our collective intelligence TODAY is nothing compared to what it will be in 100 much less 500 years, and our collective intelligence in 500 years will be nothing compared to what it will be in 1000 years. Is that more clear? I have strong confidence we'll continue to evolve, continue to increase our collective knowledge, continue innovating, and spread throughout the galaxy (if we don't blow ourselves up first.)
    Others have found us before we found them.

    #686 2 years ago
    Quoted from ThatOneDude:

    it's not likely that we can actually construct such things. Just because something can be modeled mathematically does not mean it can be engineered, or even actually exist.

    Do you not see the assumptions you are making here? If FTL travel is impossible, it doesn't matter how advanced the race is. If it is, then we're completely wrong about physics.

    Really? Prove something mathematically and it's possible, period. Just because we haven't figured out how to engineer it currently does not mean we won't eventually. Again, I'm thinking about what's possible in 100-500 years from now. Extraterrestrial life could be thousands of years ahead of us also meaning we can't possibly comprehend their logic for how they would interact with us at this point.

    Yes, I have an open mind that FTL is absolutely possible. You're making the assumption it's not because a guy named Einstein said so a century ago (and therefore, alien intelligence can't be visiting). However, as I noted, we have physicists already proposing a method for FTL (the Alcubierre drive) without violating Einstein's field theory so yes, I'm keeping an open mind.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alcubierre_drive

    And, our current understanding of physics is VERY much incomplete and full of massive holes. We know there is a LOT we don't know. Give us a 'problem' and we solve it. That's what we do.
    #TheyreHere

    #688 2 years ago
    Quoted from Deaconblooze:

    There's a spider in my shower right now. I see it every time I go to the bathroom. I have a few choices...
    1. Leave it be
    2. Kill it
    3. Carry it to the outdoors
    My intention is always 3, but the shower is located in the basement and as soon as I'm done relieving myself I forget about my thought experiment and go about the rest of my day, failing to bring a suitable vessel back to rescue the spider.
    Then I started to realize that perhaps 3 might even be inconveniencing the spider. There are no predators in its current location (other than me), and it seemingly has a source of food (the drain?) since it's sustained itself for at least a month.
    I don't regularly use that shower. If my wife would happen to need it and I forget to carry out 3 by then... unfortunately for the spider, option 2 is suddenly in play.
    Point being I imagine intelligent life capable of traveling the universe may treat us in much the same way. We're probably not really worth their time. If we become worth their time, it's likely because they need our resources. That might be a problem for us..

    My Hypothesis: We're worth their time. First, if they've managed to evolve intellectually beyond our current state they likely do put value on intelligent life (even one so far behind their own intellect) and would not want to see us destroy such a valuable commodity (a rocky planet capable of sustaining life). So I propose they would have a need or a desire for a symbiotic relationship with us. First, they need us to maintain this planet as habitable so they can visit when need be. Second, I'm willing to bet Earth wouldn't be just an endpoint for them. It's likely just a rest stop to them traveling to even further solar systems. Perhaps they may need facilities here to work on their "ships". Repairs or otherwise. They likely wouldn't be able to transport mass quantities of certain materials and machinery needed and if they could just tell us "we need a sheet of titanium cut into these dimensions of this thickness" or "create us a facility of this size with these specifications" (lame examples, I know) and we could in turn provide that for some know-how and technological advances from them.

    #691 2 years ago
    Quoted from BMore-Pinball:

    or they are preprogramed artificial intelligent drones / space probes sent out billions of years ago programed to find planets with any life on them, hang around for years, and report back - life forms that sent them could be to far away to reach us if they even still exist.

    That remains a possibility! But my belief (obviously) has shifted enormously now that the U.S government has made a 180 on their approach to UFO's. My thinking tells me there is very much a reason they're using a new term (UAP). They do not want the historical stigma attached to UFO's to persist. Given our advances in camera phone photos and video capabilities combined with increasing zoom lense capabilities ... COMBINED with 5G technology coming online and the ability to send large amounts of data around the planet instantaneously .. they must see a need to slowly let the revelation come to light (versus us waking up one morning to incredible closeup video of alien technology). Intelligent extraterrestial "machines" (at a minimum, but I'm betting actual life) are visiting. I believe wholeheartedly we're in a process and the government absolutely has high-resolution video and photos themselves. These machines seem to have a keen interest in our most advanced technology (ie. military) and spend most of their time observing such (versus flying over subdivisions or large cities).

    BTW, don't forget ... when asked on live TV if the U.S was in possession of alien technology Lou Elizondo (the former Director of the AATIP) responded "the U.S is in possession of exotic material, and I'll leave it at that".

    #695 2 years ago

    Fun info from the 1990's.

    "The movement of the UFO was not accompanied by sound of any kind and was distinguished by its' startling maneuverability. It seemed the UFO was devoid of inertia". SOUND FAMILIAR? This was the 90's ... Do you think they were witnessing advanced U.S technology?? I don't think so.

    https://unknownboundaries.com/russian-general-fully-disclosed-ufos-not-of-this-world-piloted-by-intelligent-beings/?fbclid=IwAR3rPAAeROjpwqroQPXgZC4U1grSl3ts3_wc_bOPktmHvZ-TFVpUoUJGm5I

    #697 2 years ago
    Quoted from TRAMD:

    Oh, to live in a world of such naivete and wonderment. To believe that life from another planet visiting us is more likely than deceptive fear-mongering by the corrupt people in government to the end of increasing control, power, and wealth. To believe that the people in government are there with the primary goal of making life better for the citizens and not just there to funnel tax dollars to themselves and their friends. Your benevolent overlords appreciate your confidence.

    I'm thinking you're precisely the type of person who is going to go into shock and die of a heart attack when you witness alien life firsthand, lol. Sure, hundreds of credible (highly intelligent military personnel in the know) sources around the world all reporting seeing the same 'machines' or objects behaving in the same way, and it's because they all just want us in fear. Our government is now lying to us about inexplicable machines because it would just be too hard to say China has advanced weapons we don't have a response for. No, It's much better to just tell people there are advanced machiens at least 100 to 1000 years ahead of us visiting.

    Who are the naive ones here?

    #703 2 years ago
    Quoted from kvan99:Not they didn't the US gov't said they can't explain what the pilots are seeing. They never said aliens are real.

    I never said Aliens are real either (albeit I personally believe that is the VERY clear implication). But YES, the government (including President Obama) have stated that we cannot explain what our military personnel are "seeing" (both with direct visual observation as well as being backed up by our latest radar technology) but it IS happening. What I have also said is the U.S government is now admitting (in a complete 180 reversal of policy) that they are seeing "UAP" regularly and they cannot explain them including that they do not believe it can be explained as being another government's technology. Period.

    I have also stated I believe the U.S government has started a "process" of revealing the truth which Lou Elizondo has said himself ("it's a process"). This is someone highly credible to say the least. If you wish to believe all of these folks are either lying or are mistaken of what they witnessed with their own eyes, that's your choice.

    #714 2 years ago
    Quoted from benheck:

    Mining? Please. There's an entire asteroid field with all the metal you would ever need oh and BTW they aren't guarded by billions of people with nukes.

    They aren't afraid of our nukes being used on them. They're afraid of us destroying this planet. But I agree 110% they could care less about any "resources" on this planet beyond the planet itself. I believe they're more interested in helping us if anything and as I said earlier there are reasons they could want a symbiotic relationship with humans.

    If you've never watched the Paul Hellyer testimony, give it a watch (another credible government official, this time from Canada ... urging governments that humanity is ready for the truth).

    #715 2 years ago

    Included in this video is the NEW video of radar that was released just today. It's a bit lengthy but he gives a great description of what you're seeing in the radar data and the various types of radar the Navy uses all of which corroborated this incident. If it is our own technology (DARPA or otherwise) it makes no sense why they would be harassing one of our own group of ships and risk altercation.

    If it IS China or Russia off San Diego's coast we're in trouble. The 17:45 mark in the video onward gets particularly interesting.

    #718 2 years ago
    Quoted from benheck:

    Or maybe they're pushing UFOs in the news as a distraction ahead of a Wuhan Lab Leak Reveal.
    Bending over for political moderation paddling... now.

    Given the incredibly weak news coverage of these UAP/UFO revelations and people's reaction of complete denial and even laughing (including many in this thread) I guess they'll need to reveal a lot more about these phenomenon to catch people's attention.

    That said, I don't see any logic in thinking "Hey, we don't want people to pay attention to us pointing the finger at Wuhan so we'll go ahead and reveal the biggest secret in the history of humanity to distract them". I think that's completely a separate issue even smaller than Iran potentially re-entering any nuclear deal. I do find this administration's desire to re-enter that deal with Iran SO desperately a bit more odd ...

    #720 2 years ago
    Quoted from Honch:

    None of it makes any sense. Why admit anything at all when it comes to UFOs? I'm not buying into the argument that their hand is being forced on this issue.

    I agree 100% but it's absolutely CLEAR there is a 180 degree turn in policy after a century or more of complete denial. You cannot deny that much. I contemplate the possibilities for why, constantly.

    Is it simply a think tank came to the realization that with the increase of high-resolution video cameras combined with 5G that it's only a matter of time before someone captures something they shouldn't and it spreads around the world instantly? Is it because the presence and occurrence of these incidents is increasing dramatically? IF ... IF alien intelligence is here have they detected that humanity has reached some precipice of intellect (where our collective intelligence is growing exponentially?) and they need to step in or watch us much more closely? Or did America become aware some other country has captured a crashed UFO and/or are preparing to reveal what THEY have witnessed or discovered?

    Whatever the case, something has clearly changed. There is a very strange feeling of what is going on in the world right now. There are more bombshells to come (soon), that much I'm sure of.

    #721 2 years ago
    Quoted from Honch:

    None of it makes any sense. Why admit anything at all when it comes to UFOs? I'm not buying into the argument that their hand is being forced on this issue.

    BTW, the fact that this one "swarm" of UAP's were all around the USS Omaha seems like its' not a coincidence. This ship was just commissioned in February, 2018 (only a year before this incident). This particular ship was said to be carrying some of our latest and most advanced technology to date. That alone makes this incident all the more eerie.

    https://www.defense.gov/Explore/News/Article/Article/1429521/

    #724 2 years ago
    Quoted from benheck:

    One reason could be propaganda against the CCP. As Communists they ban religion so nothing can be above government. Aliens changes that. Could drive a wedge of hope between the Chinese people and their oppressive government. (and a weaker CCP benefits the world)

    China doesn't actually ban religion per se although they definitely favor atheism as a state. They tightly control religion but recognize five of them and allow citizens to practice. When I'm in Shanghai I see churches and know colleagues who attended (a couple Catholics and a couple Buddhists actually.)

    It's possible it's completely propaganda but it sure seems like very high-risk propaganda to be putting forth these revelations that could have serious repercussions on national policy among other risks. It would be a large conspiracy to have so many military personnel (and non-military for that matter) participating.

    #731 2 years ago
    Quoted from tilted81:

    Right like why bother. I suppose there could be a chance they are protecting us from other hostiles?
    The whole thing creeps me out. I’ve thought about it practically my whole life.
    Edit: the fact things seem more open about it is alarming to me.

    Because ...
    A) They like Earth as a rest stop to elsewhere
    B) They just don't want to see us destroy this planet (either via Global Warming or via Nuclear War that they themselves nearly averted?)
    C) We have plenty to offer in terms of construction and resources refining for them ...
    D) They would have a FAR deeper understanding of just how rare (or not) life is and act accordingly to protect us ...
    E) What if .. IF we ever could achieve inter-Solar System travel as a species? What would WE value most in other Solar Systems? Certainly not resource such as particular elements as Ben noted. Diversity of life (a lot of us are "people watchers" lol)? Incredible Geological discoveries far greater than the Grand Canyon? Perhaps a greater meaning to life, period? IS there a higher intelligence than all of us that actually created the "Big Bang"?! That might interest us.

    I just cannot believe in ANY scenario they would feel we are a threat great enough to wipe us out entirely. It is possible certain alien species would be indifferent to a few of us dying so they could learn more about our biology (I know ... yes ... "alien abduction"). But I don't see logic in mass extermination.

    #733 2 years ago
    Quoted from LTG:

    What if they are without feeling. Don't care. We are nothing to them. Their logic is kill everything they encounter ?
    LTG : )

    To achieve such a high level of intelligence and be so indifferent to the fragility of life is incompatible as we know intelligence. How could they possibly perceive us as a threat in the vastness of the Galaxy much less the universe. Such thinking is that of Hollywood fantasy. No, they would consider anything and everything that we could potentially offer them and as I noted previously there are several reasons for them to consider a symbiotic relationship.

    IF .. IF these phenomenon are real (and NOW, given current revelations I have no reason to think they are not) then you have to consider "This isn't new. These phenomenon/encounters have been occurring and documented for centuries at a minimum" (how do you not suddenly give credence to stories documented for centuries that are similar in nature??).

    We are a far greater threat to ourselves than they are to us and they must seemingly be interested in helping us. BUT, we have to overcome humbling ourselves to realize we're not the pinnacle of intelligence and we are not in control. When you think about that, that is revolutionary for us as a species.

    Far, far out there ... yet, what an amazing time to be alive.

    #737 2 years ago
    Quoted from LTG:

    That is part of the question. There may be no way to know as they know. Did they grow up mellow. Or is death and destruction all they know ?

    I hope so.
    LTG : )

    lol, I know. But really, this is a fear Hollywood has created. I stop and think, even in our young juvenile level of intelligence ... wouldn't we stop to consider why we would spend resources on 'exterminating' an alien life (if we found it)?!? Of course not, how idiotic. We'd assess it and consider how we could help them and how they could help us. Even IF we encountered an intelligent life such as that of the ancient Mayans (tribal in nature) we wouldn't just wipe them out. We wouldn't drop down and say "Hey guys, what's going on?". We'd observe them from afar, study their planet, and leave them alone for the most part. We can't rule out a species not so compassionate that they wouldn't abduct a few humans for study ... but I can't perceive a rationale for wiping us out either.

    #756 2 years ago
    Quoted from fuseholder:

    Or F) We are food.

    We wouldn't be flourishing as a society if we were food or if they wanted to eliminate us as some threat to them. They didn't just show up yesterday. IF, IF the government comes clean with what they know, and they've concluded these actually are extraterrestrial intelligent beings visiting us ... they've been doing it for millennia. The same descriptions of these craft have been repeated for centuries. The cigar shape (Silver in color). The Tic Tac (white). The saucer (2 varieties). The 'Bell' shape. The perfect Sphere. The pyramid-shaped craft. I'm confident our government has developed such classifications for UAP and even categorized the various capabilities for each that have been witnessed. I hope we get to that level of revelation and transparency in the not-too-distant future.

    #764 2 years ago

    There have been many inexplicable events in history but this one in particular was remarkable. "Witnessed by countless numbers of people". I'm sure it must have been "swamp gas", lol. Of all the sightings I've ever heard of this is the only that described what appeared to be a battle in the sky.
    https://alienigenasdopassado.com.br/en/the-nuremberg-ufos-battle-of-1561/?fbclid=IwAR3YChv-r9WQVQ1Q280eFq-n7SYEgt_SIEaWT2EPk81LL3V-zZkEsyOHj3Q

    #769 2 years ago
    Quoted from DanQverymuch:

    Aaaaaand for a slightly more rational interpretation of the event, we have
    https://publicdomainreview.org/collection/celestial-phenomenon-over-nuremberg-april-14th-1561
    Gee, how come the pro-ufo article didn't give a full translation of the German text?

    lol, so more "swamp gas"? And I'm not sure what you meant by the "full translation"? The story seems comprehensive to me. Orbs (and there is that black disc/cigar shape again, "spear") that appeared to fight and at least one that crashed to Earth producing "immense smoke". But, could just essentially be another "swamp gas" incident mistaken for a battle of objects in the sky.

    #771 2 years ago
    Quoted from DanQverymuch:

    I love when people think "lol" bolsters their case, when they are the ones whose beliefs are laughable.
    I was referring to the full translation of the German text of the woodcut being included in the sensible article that I linked, and not in the gullible one you did. It shows the mindset of the ignorant, prescientific, 1500s peasant mind that wrote it. Some witness! For starters, the objects flew into and out of the sun?
    The creator of the woodcut, Hans Glaser, was a nut job, according to this article: https://www.amusingplanet.com/2020/02/the-mysterious-sky-battle-over.html
    Which is more likely, a confluence of well documented aerial phenomena, or a ufo battle?
    And why are you on about swamp gas? That was one possible explanation for one kind of sighting, and you are using it to be dismissive about all skepticism.

    I'm not sure why a simple conversation around unexplained aerial phenomena is so upsetting and makes you so angry but perhaps this topic is a bit too much for you? My "lol" is that skeptics such as you can dismiss anything, even something so detailed as was this incident, with the most innocent of atmospheric conditions. I've seen sundogs, they're very common. It's not some once in a lifetime phenomenon and I don't think their description of what they witnessed fits (not the least of which being the "immense amount smoke"). Just because people didn't have cellphones 500 years ago doesn't mean they were complete morons either.
    Start getting your excuses together now for when the Pentagon report on UAP comes out in a few weeks.

    #776 2 years ago
    Quoted from DanQverymuch:

    Endless gullibilty, that's for sure! A googolplex of bullshit!
    When the big report comes out simply saying they don't know what they are, we'll be right back where we started.

    Wait, when the Pentagon report confirms they are seeing physical objects displaying capabilities that defy physics as we know it, and they are corroborated with eyewitness testimony combined with a multitude of our most advanced radar and sensors from multiple sources ... that's where we "started"?? You think that's where we've been for decades?? Where are your innocent explanations for these objects?!? How can the most brilliant people in our country not explain them?

    #803 2 years ago
    Quoted from Yipykya:

    https://www.military.com/video/aircraft/military-aircraft/tr-3b-aurora-anti-gravity-spacecrafts/2860314511001
    Haha, this was posted in 2013
    And there's still T-Shirts being sold if anyone wants to get in on the hype!
    amazon.com link »

    Long rumored, and also zero evidence of its' actual existence. This was supposedly a picture of it.
    https://www.tasnimnews.com/en/news/2018/09/15/1829282/ufo-like-object-spotted-aboard-us-aircraft-carrier-video

    But this is not even remotely like some of the visual observations described by pilots. "No control surfaces or panels". "No signs of propulsion". "Silent". "Shaped like a white Tic Tac" (in some cases). "Endurance" we've never seen nor can explain. "Trans-medium" in nature (go from air to water and back). So aside from solving anti-gravity, we'd have to develop the materals to withstand these immense forces (600 G's?!?) as well as an energy source to sustain the flight times and distances these craft covered and OH, include the capability of going underwater and navigating to boot. Go DARPA!

    Besides, if we had a TR-3 why would we harrass our own military? Go drive China and Russia nuts. Also, if we understood gravity well enough to create antoi-gravity we'd have reinvented the automobile by now among hundreds of other technologies and be sending crafts to other solar systems in the near future.

    #806 2 years ago
    Quoted from Yipykya:

    Look, I'm just saying, you need to have an open mind. Come on.

    Me having an open mind led me to the conclusion we're not alone.

    Quoted from benheck:

    Yup. Then confirm aliens one day and the COVID lab leak the next. WW3 averted.

    Once our government confirms alien craft are here (drones or otherwise) then other revelations begin to fall one after another:
    - Wait, so was Roswell real?
    - What about the long-rumored story of alien craft seemingly disabling our nuclear weapons (occurrences both here and in Russia)
    - If they're that advanced I guess WW3 is no longer a concern ... aliens really will save us from ourselves?
    - If these craft are real, have we attempted to communicate with them? (I say that one rhetorically because you know our government would have tried)
    - Did they respond??
    etc etc etc
    Point being, the story won't end with confirmation "Sure, UAP are real and our best hypothesis is they're alien in nature".

    #809 2 years ago
    Quoted from razorsedge:

    Well, if I was choosing a testbed for my gravitational propulsion system, which also by nature manipulates "G-forces" (I would suppose, so +600G might be all we can comprehend for the "pilot" if there is one, but lacking consideration) ... I'd probably start with something that looks like a regular aircraft anyway, so not to attract instant attention at every moment.
    Move on to aerodynamic tictacs in later generations.
    Just sayin' Lol

    Why would creating anti-gravity eliminate inertia?

    #811 2 years ago
    Quoted from razorsedge:

    Do you know how to create "anti-gravity" ?

    No, but that's partly my point. Just because you can offset or make something that is not impacted by gravity does not mean you can suddenly move 13,000 mph and not have to worry about inertia.

    #855 2 years ago
    Quoted from Luckydogg420:

    To be transparent, I watched the whole 3 hour podcast the other day and didn’t look at the clip you posted, although I’m fairly certain I know what part of the podcast that is in the clip. I’ve seen Neil talk about this topic in a couple interviews, he has the same spiel everywhere he goes.

    I get that he's a natural skeptic, however ...
    He doesn't even acknowledge or discuss that the government has been adamantly denying, downplaying, and burying UFO reports FOREVER ... until now.
    He doesn't really acknowledge that YES, these latest videos are corroborated by multiple radar systems, types of sensors, and from multiple ships .. AND it was combined with 4 pilots visual confirmation of "something" with their own eyes.
    And yes, perhaps if alien technology is so far ahead of our own, it's not all that hard for them to cover their tracks (ie. disable your cameras). We know multiple of these pilot encounters speak of having their radar systems jammed.
    I also think intelligent life would be far more interested in our most advanced technology (if they want to assess where we are in our intellectual evolution) and that technology resides almost exclusively with the military. Hence, they get harassed the most frequently.

    #857 2 years ago
    Quoted from TRAMD:

    I just can't take someone seriously who discounts the rational arguments of people who disagree with them as not knowing what they don't know but then makes multiple unfounded assumptions in every post they make. It has been a fine example of hypocrisy and begging the question logical fallacy, however, so I continue to follow for entertainment value.

    But it's NOT rational. You can tell from his responses that he hasn't bothered to LISTEN to what the pilots and Navy personnel are saying. He immediately starts dismissing it all as simply A malfunctioning sensor. He clearly hasn't bothered to listen to the full story ... multiple ships involved with multiple types of radar and various sensor systems all tracking these objects (in the case of the 2004 incident off San Diego) COMBINED with pilots being sent to investigate and having visual confirmation with their own eyes. So no, I don't think his "argument" is rational in the slightest.

    Here is a fantastic DETAILED description of why the "Gimbal" incident is basically impossible to explain without an otherworldly craft explanation. If you really care to dismiss this, get educated first (this is our newest 5th generation fighter cockpit .. state of the art, new capabilities in 2004).

    #867 2 years ago
    Quoted from DanQverymuch:

    NYT scooped the report! Big nothingburger! Golly gee, am I psychic, or what?

    Aaaaaand here we are.
    [quoted image]

    P-R-O-C-E-S-S. Of course they weren't going to just say "yep, aliens". But this is a HUGE step to say, yes, these objects are real and we cannot explain them as hard as we've tried. This is to say "people, you may need to open your minds to the possibility and let that sink in." This much is most definitely not where we started.

    #884 2 years ago
    Quoted from chad:

    I really wasn't expecting much, but had some hope .
    It's as if I went to the range and all the guns just had a flag that came out that said Bang, instead of actual ammo.

    The report is not even officially out yet and you guys act like it was nothing to report.
    The United States admitting it encounters UFO's on a regular basis that it cannot explain is major news.
    The United States admitting these objects are real and cannot be explained as a fly on the lens or even a faulty radar glitch is major news.
    The United States admitting it cannot rule out an extraterrestrial source for these objects is major news.

    If you thought the United States was just going to come out in this report and admit they've actually made contact or communicated with these objects and they KNOW they are extraterrestrial in nature then you're a moron.

    If YOU knew aliens were real and you could no longer keep it a secret indefinitely how would you reveal that news to society in a manner which causes minimal disruption? Minimal panic? Minimal change in our way of life including impact to various religions?

    It's a PROCESS of revelation. Enjoy your latest step toward understanding our place in the Universe.

    #939 2 years ago
    Quoted from TRAMD:

    I truly don't understand believing that the people in government being truthful and aliens being here on Earth as more likely than the people in government lying to you as a means of covering up information and/or further gaining control through fear. Far too many of you pro-alien guys are basing your positions on the assumption that the people in government are being honest.
    Also, even if I required first hand evidence of the existence of fighter jets, I have that; as if I even needed to address such a silly comparison.

    I truly don't understand your "logic" here. So, you're suggesting the government WAS being truthful the past 70-80 years when they denied every single UFO incident and NOW they're lying when they say these incidents are real and happening?? And who the heck is in "fear"?? The government doesn't need aliens to control people, they have the media for that.

    BTW, David Fravor is no longer working for the government. He is a civilian now reporting what he witnessed when he was in the Navy (and his account is verified by others who witnessed his incident in 2004). He is by far the most credible person I've ever heard witness a UFO. The podcast with Lex Fridman (which ran nearly 4 HOURS) is fascinating. That interview truly gives you an understanding of how extremely intelligent David is and his depth of training and knowledge of aircraft. As a Top Gun graduate and Commanding Officer of a fighter group you truly get to understand his ability to identify other aircraft and why what he (and others) witnessed was not of this world. I'm not sure how you can dismiss his account (and several others corroborated accounts) from that day, beyond "they're all just lying".

    #943 2 years ago

    Here is a fun thought to ponder: IF ... if there are intelligent extraterrestrial species visiting Earth (via drones or otherwise) and they have been doing so for thousands of years, you would have to think they have taken extensive video throughout all of time. Perhaps they could show us actual video of Egyptians and the construction of the Pyramids. Perhaps they have video of Rome and life of Romans in that day. Heck, perhaps they could even have video of dinosaurs. I would have to think any species more advanced than our current intellect also created an "internet" and have vast archives of digital IP passed down (preserved) for millennia.

    #972 2 years ago
    Quoted from JAXPinball:

    This pilot's reaction is worth a good chuckle

    Check these videos out of this incident in Jerusalem. When the broadcaster says "here's another video from a different angle" watch closely (it's only a split second or two). It looks EXACTLY like the pulsating orb the pilot in Mexico spotted in your video.

    #TheyAreHere

    #976 2 years ago
    Quoted from Fytr:

    Blurry out of focus lense + aircraft nav light.

    lol, yes, an "aircraft" navigating straight down on the Dome, hovering perfectly still for a few seconds, and then shooting straight upward at a speed I've never seen ANY craft ever do. Witnessed (as noted from the multiple videos) from different angles completely opposite of the Dome showing the same angle of entry and exit. BTW, this coincides perfectly with David Fravor's description of the 2004 incident where the Navy was witnessing "objects" dropping from beyond 80,000 feet down to sea level, seemingly hovering for a bit, then retreating straight back up.

    At this point I'm thinking you're pretty much going to need an alien punch you in the face and say "hey idiot, I'm real".

    #988 2 years ago

    Her theory that the objects may be a 3D "projection" from a higher dimension is certainly plausible. It doesn't change the (now) apparent fact there is other intelligence out there though.

    At the 18 minute mark she makes the most obvious observation as demonstrated by this thread. The arrival and realization of otherworldly higher intelligence is met with a yawn and continued disbelief.

    #997 2 years ago
    Quoted from RonSS:

    I was just thinking, the pilots in the videos seem as though it's their first time seeing these. Yet, we're told they see them near daily.
    So, are these the "early" videos?
    There must be 100s - 1,000s more, right?
    Maybe that's next.

    The 2 pilots involved in the 2004 "Tic Tac" incident specifically mentioned they're comfortable discussing that incident because it has long been declassified. David Fravor in particular seems to hint in several other interviews that he is aware of more.

    The 3rd pilot in the 60 Minutes episode operates on the East Coast and he specifically noted that these incidents happen near daily.

    Jeremy Corbell has noted he has significantly more video footage that he'll be releasing over time. He has also commented that he knows firsthand that the government has much higher resolution video/photos of UAP.

    #1007 2 years ago
    Quoted from Fytr:

    I'd just like to point out that all of these videos have been thoroughly debunked.

    OMG, you are seriously out to lunch. Aside from the fact that there are multiple EYE WITNESSES who literally saw an unexplainable object(s), and aside from the FACT that these objects were picked up by multiple types of our most advanced radar system and sensors, the military themselves are telling you they cannot explain these objects as hard as they have tried (and they do investigate). So you get a person or two making videos for profit with some random theory (oh, it's a bird) on each video (as if it was just a single source in each incident) and you consider that "thoroughly debunked, case solved"?? Good Lord. The Gimbal incident explanation in particular is just ridiculous.

    #1011 2 years ago
    Quoted from Fytr:

    Sure. You seem particularly emotionally invested in this for some reason.
    Let's just say that it is clear to me that the available evidence points to the rational and terrestrial explanation in a convincing manner. And literally zero actual evidence of anything else.
    Can you explain what part of the simple explanations provided in the videos I linked you can find fault with? Is the math wrong?

    My exasperation comes from people like you treating our military like complete morons as if these Mr Wizards thought of something the top scientists and military experts haven't. You literally have a President (former President Barack Obama) telling you "it's true, these objects are real and we cannot explain them". You literally have expert Navy pilots telling you what they witnessed with their OWN eyes (forget the advanced radars and sensors altogether) but you put your faith in Mr Wizard and his simple explanations. Okay.

    #1041 2 years ago
    Quoted from benheck: Point being, religion isn't meant to be taken literally.

    THIS. Exactly. Of course not, Good Lord ... a higher intelligence trying to explain a level of phsyics we STILL are not even close to understanding. BUT ... the questions that arise when we acknowledge there are multiple higher-intelligence species visiting Earth. Wow. Just wow. Is there one in particular that is considered the true pinnacle of intelligence? Our "God"? At least in our galaxy? Are "they" in fact responsible for everything we read in the Bible? Did they come to Earth and play with our DNA? Did they plant us to begin with? Is there possibly an afterlife in a dimension unbeknownst to us?
    When you accept "Oh wow, extraterrestrial intelligence is real" ... the possibilities are dumbfounding.

    The next couple decades will be amazing.

    #1046 2 years ago

    This guy is a very curious case if you have not read about him before. Supposedly he has filed patents on behalf of his aerospace employers that clearly seem to mimic much (most) of the bizarre highly-advanced technologies we are witnessing. As Wikipedia notes, it may well be misinformation to scare our adversaries that if they should witness such technologies they might think it's the United States.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Salvatore_Pais

    #1050 2 years ago

    Great comments from Jeremy during his interview with Russell Brand on the hubris of some folks (like Neil Tyson) any why now is the time for scientists to step up, know the facts, and then propose answers.

    https://twitter.com/i/status/1403759003553906688

    #1052 2 years ago
    Quoted from Fytr:

    These people making a living interviewing one another Youtube based on gross-speculation over 10 year old blurry video is hilarious. There is zip here folks, sweet f*ck all. But sure, I bet the government is days away from releasing the extreme close-up footage they have showing little green men and spaceships that stop on a dime. Hold your breath everyone. lol!

    Got it. You do not and will not ever accept that extraterrestrial intelligence is visiting Earth. UNDERSTOOD. GOT IT. Now, why don't you go post in some thread titled "UFO's are not real" instead of constantly being dismissive and antagonistic here? Not sure why it upsets you so much that some people do have an open mind on the topic and find the recent revelations a bit fascinating (and would like to discuss it without your juvenile personal attacks).

    #1056 2 years ago
    Quoted from PinballNewb:

    Ironic considering you have probably been the most closed minded here. Y

    The whole topic of this thread is that the U.S government now acknowledges that UFOs are real. There are objects they are witnessing that they cannot explain. Period. There is nothing "ironic" about my posts.

    If your only intent here is to be dismissive and lob personal attacks then why post here at all? Go somewhere else.

    Quoted from DanQverymuch:

    I would say he doesn't see any convincing evidence and will not ever accept such a claim without seeing any convincing evidence.

    If you don't think multiple Navy pilots all stating emphatically that they know what they saw with their own eyes and could not explain the physics of it, then I don't know what to tell you. That's about the most IDEAL conditions imaginable. Perfectly clear day, perfect blue skys, no wind ... they witnessed this object which was first detected by and corroborated by multiple types of radar and sensors from multiple ships. The military has confirmed they have never been able to explain it.

    If that equates to not "any convincing evidence" in your mind then great, move along. Can the rest of us discuss the possibilities if it's not of this world without getting attacked like we're back in High School?

    #1058 2 years ago
    Quoted from Fytr:

    There is zip here folks, sweet f*ck all. But sure, I bet the government is days away from releasing the extreme close-up footage they have showing little green men and spaceships that stop on a dime. Hold your breath everyone. lol!

    So you don't realize when you're being condescending and mocking?? You really thought you were making some logical counterargument here?? Okay. This isn't "valid criticism" much less "analysis".

    #1073 2 years ago
    Quoted from beelzeboob:

    Obviously you haven't been to my house. Don't call it BS until you've experienced it. But you seem to have everything figured out, so I'll defer to your expertise in the area.

    Can't say I've ever believed in ghosts either. However, we currently do not know how many dimensions there really are! String Theory currently suggests there are 10! Also recently, scientists have discovered new particles that only exist in 2D, look up Anyons. These things are crazy. The point being, if these other dimensions exist all around us, who knows what exists in our exact same space. It's plausible that these UFO's aren't coming from a far away solar system but are coming from another dimension altogether. In that sense, something existing in a different dimension (ie. "ghosts") but having a "projection" into our 3D (or 4D) world isn't completely ludicrous.

    The fact is, we just don't currently know.

    #1076 2 years ago
    Quoted from DanQverymuch:

    The thought that these higher "dimensions" equate to separate, invisible "realms" where "higher beings," whether they be ghosts or aliens or angels or gods, could observe us from or actually visit from, is mere ignorant sci-fi buzzword babbling.
    https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/our-continued-existence-means-other-dimensions-are-probably-super-tiny-180970487/
    But I have an open mind! I'm betting the aliens are also ghosts![quoted image]

    Well, if you believe science, we have no idea where 95% of the universe "is". That is, everything humans have ever observed with all of our instruments (me, you, planets, suns, Bosons, Fermions, etc. etc.) only accounts for 5% of the composition of the universe. 27% is "dark matter" and 68% is "dark energy". We have no idea what these things are but we know they must be "here" ... somewhere.

    #1117 2 years ago
    Quoted from DanQverymuch:

    So what? We are lucky to be here, being the foam on the cosmic ocean that we are, since almost all of that 5% is hydrogen and a tiny bit of helium. To conflate "not knowing" what exactly the other 95% is with the possibility of it meaning more of this "other realm" nonsense is quite silly.

    My only point was that the brightest minds in our entire history of humanity cannot explain where the other 95% of the universe is, much less what it is. Being in another dimension we cannot interact with (at least currently) seems perfectly plausible.

    Now I'm curious what your thoughts are around things like quantum entanglement. Science has demonstrated it experimentally. Soooo ... what are your thoughts? They're wrong? They're quacks? Or .. "okay, this bizarre inexplicable ability is real but nothing else is"?

    #1120 2 years ago
    Quoted from RonSS:

    Wait, what?

    No, he's correct to a certain degree. We may live a little bit longer because of science and medicine but that's a fraction of the story. We also are no longer lawless neanderthals in constant war during the medieval ages. We have a plentiful food supply and economy. You'll also note 2 significant dips in that line over average during "modern" times (around 1865 and 1914-1916). One during the Civil War and one during World War I. That's what happens to the average when mass numbers die off due to war.

    #1132 2 years ago

    The last one in that video certainly appears to mimic the "tic tac" as it has been described.

    Also, the one in the middle of the pulsing blue light, is very similar to other videos (almost like it's constantly changing shape/color and pulsating).

    Beyond that, all the others are iffy.

    #1134 2 years ago
    Quoted from DanQverymuch:

    The blue orb is obviously ... The "pulsing" is also obviously due to auto focus fail.
    The tic tac is obviously a weather balloon

    Obviously. Obviously. Obviously. lol.

    Government admits they are seeing actual physical objects defying physics as we currently understand it and despite their best efforts to identify and explain them cannot. But "obviously" you're smarter than our government and military.

    And I don't know what you're talking about in regards to the tic tac video .. they show it multiple times in real time and slow motion and you can see it leave in a blink of an eye out of picture.

    #1136 2 years ago
    Quoted from DanQverymuch:

    If you're going to be disingenuous then there’s no point to discussion.

    If you're just going to discredit every video as a weather balloon or flashlight and the persons who took the video as idiots, is there a point to discussion?

    Quoted from DanQverymuch:

    The govt has no incentive to ever say anything more than "dunno." So they won't. Better to keep everyone guessing.

    Huh? No incentive? It's their job to identify any craft entering our airspace (or waters) and identify potential threats. That's not incentive to identify these things? You don't think they've exhausted resources trying to explain these things? Again, I don't understand treating our military like a bunch of idiots and pretending our government has a reason to lie to us now out of the blue.

    Quoted from DanQverymuch:

    I'm more curious about how a Pinsider who disappears in November 2019 resurfaces 18 months later to talk exclusively and extensively about his belief in UFOs, than I am about UFOs. Who are you, and what have you done with Mr. McDonald?

    Alien abduction. It's one giant conspiracy in the works for years on end to have this very discussion.

    #1142 2 years ago
    Quoted from DCP:

    I have to say this again: the situation is exactly the same now as it was in the 1950s and 1960s. Pilots, astronauts, cops, and ordinary citizens all see things flying around that they can't identify. No one has ever proved that UFOs "violate the laws of physics", are extraterrestrial, or use some sort of advanced technology. None of the information that has come out recently has even claimed to prove any of those things.

    With all due respect, honestly, you're not paying attention. Everything has changed. Our government would never acknowledge anything in the 1950s or 60s and we did not have anywhere near the technology that we do now.

    We just got video of the 'tic tac' craft ... video that crossed multiple types of cameras (including FLIR). You then have video of at least one screen of our latest advanced radar screen (on a ship) corroborating the object being where the pilots visually identified it. Pilots were sent to intercept because multiple warships identified a potential unidentified threat. You have multiple highly-trained pilots from multiple aircraft (at different altitudes no less) describing what they saw with their own eyes when they intercepted it. You have radar data confirming speeds and change in direction that they cannot explain (yes, defying physics as we know it.) You literally have the government telling you "it's true", they see these things, they violate our airspace, and they cannot explain them.

    I'm thinking that's pretty darn different from what people were hearing from officials in the 1950s and 1960s.

    #1170 2 years ago

    Pretty well done fake if it is (definitely a bit too shakey but if I saw something surreal I guess I wouldn't be perfectly calm). Can't tell how legit the initial 2 fighter jets looked. But you've got a good military helicopter mixed in along with the "UFO" diving into the water. But I know there are some really good fakes out there. Would like to hear military (Mexican?) confirmation of an incident.

    #1172 2 years ago

    Great summary of the back and forth with the Pentagon over the past few years that has led up to this moment of releasing a "report" this week. The report may not contain any major new bombshells but I believe it's an important next step in the process of revelation that these unidentified objects are real.

    #1175 2 years ago
    Quoted from Fytr:

    Yeah, they are weather balloons, blurry cameras taking picture of stars, planets, and aircraft in the sky, and other readily explainable phenomenon.

    We get it troll!! You're obnoxious opinion is clear.

    I'm sure the military are just a bunch of idiots tracking weather balloons dropping from 80,000 feet to sea level in 1.5 seconds (and then wasting aircraft and taxpayer dollars to intercept) and despite these objects being "readily explainable" by your genius, they're just too stupid.

    They could save taxpayers billions by just hiring you.

    #1185 2 years ago
    Quoted from DanQverymuch:

    Brandolini's Law: "The amount of energy needed to refute bullshit is an order of magnitude larger than to produce it."
    It’s easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled.
    The "big change" in that article is simply the idea that the US being open about it will supposedly lead to other nations following suit.
    Never mind the thing they're being open about is "duhhhh, we dunno what they is." Thus our rivals will continue to waste time and energy on it, like we want them to.

    DENIALISM: "In the psychology of human behavior, denialism is a person's choice to deny reality as a way to avoid a psychologically uncomfortable truth"

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Denialism

    #ReturnServe

    #1220 2 years ago
    Quoted from DCP:OK, I read it. Don't get me wrong. I want to see evidence of alien intelligence as much or more than the average person. My Dad investigated UFOs for Project Blue Book with Jacques Vallee and Dr. Hynek. In the 1970s, I was "buzzed" by a weird energy that I can't explain, but I don't have any beliefs about it because there is no proof or evidence beyond my own observation.
    I am a critical and expert observer, and I really hope to find out if aliens are visiting us.
    Yesterday's report brought us no closer to that moment, however.
    Here's my summary of what they said, based on quotes from the document:
    It starts right off admitting the high-tech hardware we're using can glitch and cause a "UAP sighting".
    p.2 "Assumptions
    Various forms of sensors that register UAP generally operate correctly and capture enough real
    data to allow initial assessments, but some UAP may be attributable to sensor anomalies."
    Now they repeat what we have known for 50+ years. We don't know what UAP are.
    p.3 "EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
    The limited amount of high-quality reporting on unidentified aerial phenomena (UAP)
    hampers our ability to draw firm conclusions about the nature or intent of UAP."
    Note the use of the word "probably". Not "definitely". And no evidence of these "physical objects" being aircraft, spacecraft, or advanced technology. Those are still only guesses, just as they have been for our entire lives.
    p.3 "Most of the UAP reported probably do represent physical objects..."
    Note the use of the phrases "appeared to" and "could be". That means they still don't know what they are. Nowhere in this
    report does it ever say that they have proof of any advanced technology or violation of the laws of physics. It only says that there are many possible explanations, exactly the same as we have known for 50+ years.
    p.3 "In a limited number of incidents, UAP reportedly appeared to exhibit unusual flight
    characteristics. These observations could be the result of sensor errors, spoofing, or
    observer misperception and require additional rigorous analysis."
    None of the 5 categories below include "alien spacecraft" or "multidimensional travelers". Those would fall under the category of "a catchall 'other' bin" to the government.
    p.3 "Our analysis of the data supports the construct that if and when individual UAP incidents are resolved they will
    fall into one of five potential explanatory categories: airborne clutter, natural atmospheric
    phenomena, USG or U.S. industry developmental programs, foreign adversary systems, and a
    catchall “other” bin."
    Note the wording: "Would" represent a security challenge "if" they are foreign adversaries. But they have not found
    any evidence that supports that explanation. Of course they should keep looking for signs of enemies. But that is
    their job. Again, nothing new revealed.
    p.3 "UAP would also represent a national security challenge if they are foreign adversary
    collection platforms or provide evidence a potential adversary has developed either a
    breakthrough or disruptive technology."
    In case you missed it in the report, they repeat it in big capital letters so there is no doubt...
    p.4 "AVAILABLE REPORTING LARGELY INCONCLUSIVE
    Limited Data Leaves Most UAP Unexplained…"
    Later on the same page, they sum it all up. UAPs remain unexplained. No aliens, no ultra-high-tech, no time travelers. Unexplained.
    p.4 "We were able to identify one reported UAP with high confidence. In that case, we identified the object as a large, deflating balloon. The others remain unexplained."
    I don't know why some of you guys insist that the government has admitted that some UAPs are using
    advanced technologies beyond our current knowledge. Here they state that they are still analyzing the data
    and have not made a conclusion yet. It would be exciting if new breakthrough technologies were revealed.
    But that hasn't happened yet.
    p.5 "Additional rigorous analysis are necessary by multiple teams or groups of technical experts to determine the nature and validity of these data. We are conducting further analysis to determine if breakthrough technologies were demonstrated."
    And yes, weather balloons.
    Once again, they state clearly that they have no new information to add that hasn't existed since the 1950s.
    p.5 "With the exception of the one instance where we determined with
    high confidence that the reported UAP was airborne clutter, specifically a deflating balloon, we
    currently lack sufficient information in our dataset to attribute incidents to specific explanations."
    Again, note the wording. They don't know anything. They are only sharing their guesses with us,and we have already guessed most of the same things. We don't have conclusive evidence or proof yet.
    p.5 "Some UAP observations could be..." "Some UAP may be..."
    The Senators that stated they had national security concerns after the hearing must not have read up through page 6. This appears to contradict their concerns.
    It also reiterates the fact that they have no proof or evidence of any "major technological advancement".
    (The real explanation for their concerns comes next).
    p.6 "Potential National Security Challenges
    We currently lack data to indicate any UAP are part of a foreign collection program or indicative
    of a major technological advancement by a potential adversary."
    A-HA! The REAL reason for this whole buildup, and for this non-report! MONEY! CHA-CHING!!!!
    p.6 "EXPLAINING UAP WILL REQUIRE ANALYTIC, COLLECTION AND
    RESOURCE INVESTMENT"
    Yes, see??? It's all just a big money grab. Yes, throw more money at it. Lots and lots of money.
    p.7 "Increase Investment in Research and Development
    The UAPTF has indicated that additional funding for research and development could further the
    future study of the topics laid out in this report."
    And lastly, their definition of UAP. Not aliens, time travelers, dimensional protrusions, foreign Brainiac villains,
    interstellar drones, or any of that. Unexplained. Not known.
    The term "UAP" was merely created to draw attention away from "UFO", which has become a synonym for alien
    spacecraft, despite also meaning UNIDENTIFIED flying object.
    <sigh> Nothing that we haven't already known since the 1960s.
    p.8 "APPENDIX A - Definition of Key Terms
    This report and UAPTF databases use the following defining terms:
    Unidentified Aerial Phenomena (UAP): Airborne objects not immediately identifiable. The
    acronym UAP represents the broadest category of airborne objects reviewed for analysis."

    *Sigh indeed. Instead of reading between the lines your eyes seem to go right to the keywords you hold firm to be true.
    We've known for some time the government would never come right out and say aliens are real (how irresponsible would that be?!). It's a process that starts with the government admitting they encounter UAP they cannot explain (and in some cases displaying abilities we REALLY cannot explain) and people opening their minds to the very real possibility extraterrestrial intelligence (whether drones/probes or personally) is one possible explanation. For some people accpeting this possibility is more challenging than for others.

    To that end, what this report just confirmed, however, is that the U.S military does in fact encounter UAP's in relatively large numbers that they cannot explain. The vast majority are not weather balloons. It's not dirt on the radar. UAP are real. Does not necessarily mean they are extraterrestrial in nature, however, they cannot explain them (and clearly they've tried hard due to the potential impact on national security.)

    I'm a bit surprised by the number of persons here who can't seem to grasp just how much things HAVE just changed. When has the government ever acknowledged there are real UAP's (physical objects) they cannot identify much less that (some) appear to display capabilities they also can't explain? When has the government ever openly called for a new system to report and track these UAP? When has the government ever called for the stigma surrounding UAP to be removed? This IS a major first step by our government in revealing the full extent of what they know. BTW, if you really haven't been paying attention, Congress received a much more in-depth analysis with far more confidential information. If you've listened to their comments on their briefing they seemed shocked, almost shaken. So imagine what they're keeping from the public to not cause panic.

    Jeremy Corbell just revealed he'll be releasing new information (video?) this coming Tuesday. We now have that to look forward to and I suspect more and more information will be coming at a faster pace in the coming weeks and months.

    https://twitter.com/JeremyCorbell?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Eauthor

    #1222 2 years ago
    Quoted from DCP:

    Perhaps it's because we know that things haven't changed much at all. I was quoting what the report actually said, not reading between the lines.
    Nowhere in that report does it say we'd better prepare for meeting extraterrestrials. The most dire explanation that they offer is that foreign adversaries may have advanced technology we don't know about.
    They also do in fact state that most UAP / UFO reports are explained as natural phenomena, weather balloons, etc. It is only a small number of reports that remain unexplained after investigation.

    Again ... STEP ONE. Step one is not "These could be aliens" or "aliens are real"! Good Lord.

    And no, they did not state that most UAP are explained as natural phenomenon. They noted categories these objects might fall into. They identified ONE as conclusively being a weather balloon.

    I wonder why "readily explainable" phenomenom (if they were) may "require additional scientific knowledge to successfully collect on, analyze and characterize some of them". How odd. Think about THAT quote in the report.

    "military aircraft systems processed radio frequency (RF) energy associated with UAP sightings". Hmm ... now that's odd.

    " We are conducting further analysis to determine if breakthrough technologies were demonstrated". Wait, that's a real possibility? ODD.

    Again, an important first step was just taken. That's all. The reveal was never going to come overnight. Absolutely things just changed.

    #1227 2 years ago
    Quoted from zr11990:

    The government does nothing without an agenda. Why would they all of a sudden come out and admit there are UFOs and, not yet, aliens? They either want to distract you from something or it will help them push something. I’ll put my faith in Jesus way before either of the former.

    Generally I agree (about government). They lie a lot. However, there are plenty of plausible reasons the government has felt enough pressure that they need a "process" of revealing the truth versus the consequences of a "big bang" revelation to the world. For starters, the quality and number of high-resolution camera/video phones has reached a critical number such that the odds of catching indisputable hard evidence of UFO/WAP's has reached an increasing point of deniability. Perhaps (even according to the governments own publicly disclosed information) the number of incidents is increasing in very recent decades. Perhaps the soure of these UAP alone is forcing their hand. Any of these arguments would cause the government to begin their idea of the best steps (process) to take to reveal the truth.
    But I'm with you, I put my faith and trust in God and the Holy Trinity. I just wonder how this will change our understanding of "God" and religions in general.

    #1233 2 years ago
    Quoted from Flowst:

    Sadly, much of the usual argument and negative energy in this thread.
    So as someone who was around in the 70’s, let me add some nostalgia here. Surely we can all take a moment to enjoy this....and remember how this movie made us feel?[quoted image]

    I was around for the 70's, lol. Interestingly, J. Allen Hynek (of Project Blue Book) himself was a major consultant to Spielberg for this movie. Likely far more accurate than most realize.

    #1238 2 years ago
    Quoted from beelzeboob:

    Problem is, with cellphones being so prevalent, there are a shit ton of new videos out there (which is the case with all paranormal stuff these days). And they're frigging HUGE, which is tough to replicate with a guy in a costume.
    Personally, I completely understand people that run in the opposite direction. If it was me, I'd do the same....AFTER I shit my pants. I mean, does anybody ever really say, "Hey! That thing is twice our size! Let's go get 'im!"

    I'll say it ... what if Bigfoot is just an alien species exploring?

    #1261 2 years ago
    Quoted from HoakyPoaky:

    There are 144 events since 2004, but you really have to focus on the most unexplained of these events.

    144 documented events (significant enough they were documented that is.) Most pilots/military will tell you the vast majority of incidents go unreported.

    Here's another recent event that is curious.

    Looking forward to Jeremy Corbell's new information tomorrow!

    #1265 2 years ago
    Quoted from DCFAN:

    Looks like a helicopter or drone to me but I have no idea how big it is. It appears to have a typical flashing light you see on aircraft in the latter part of the video.

    Agreed, it could be a drone. But as the person notes it's in restricted airspace and nothing is showing up on radar. A helicopter should also be audible. If it is just a drone being tested by the military it seemingly has a very impressive battery/energy life (at the 3:30 mark of the video he notes he's already been locked on it for nearly 9 minutes at that point).

    #1278 2 years ago
    Quoted from DCP:

    Please show me where in the report it says that. My "reading difficulty" is apparently making it difficult to see.

    P. 5 .... quote:
    "In 18 incidents, described in 21 reports, observers reported unusual UAP movement patterns or flight characteristics. Some UAP appeared to remain stationary in winds aloft, move against the wind, maneuver abruptly, or move at considerable speed, without discernable means of propulsion. In a small number of cases, military aircraft systems processed radio frequency (RF) energy associated with UAP sightings. The UAPTF holds a small amount of data that appear to show UAP demonstrating acceleration or a degree of signature management. Additional rigorous analysis are necessary by multiple teams or groups of technical experts to determine the nature and validity of these data. We are conducting further analysis to determine if breakthrough technologies were demonstrated."

    P. 6 ... definition of the incidents falling into the "other" category, quote:
    "we may require additional scientific knowledge to successfully collect on, analyze and characterize some of them. We would group such objects in this category pending scientific advances that allowed us to better understand them."

    Why do you think we would need new "scientific advances" just to "understand them"?? Hmm. And "managing a degree of signature management". Do you know what they are suggesting with that sentence??

    If you think this report was intended in some way to convey some level of confidence that the military has zero concern and believes all of these incidents are explainable, I guess we'll just agree to disagree.

    -1
    #1280 2 years ago
    Quoted from DCP:

    That's not what I've been saying at all.
    I've said, and the report also says, that no one knows what UFOs are yet.
    And nowhere in your quote does it say that anything "appears to be breakthrough technology". You're just interpreting it that way.
    Some people are "true believers" and some are skeptics.

    The last sentence in the first quote specifically states " We are conducting further analysis to determine if breakthrough technologies were demonstrated". So YES, it appears they are looking to verify the data they HAVE.

    And of course they're not going to come right and say what UFO's are. How moronic. But what they are strongly hinting at is that the objets are very real, are in our airspace, and are demonstrating abilities (breakthrough or not!) that suggest they are not benign (ie. not a weather balloon floating against the wind for example.)

    -2
    #1287 2 years ago
    Quoted from DCP:

    Yes, I agree that it "appears that they are looking to verify" data they have.
    That does not mean it appears there is breakthrough technology. I don't know how you can conclude that from the information provided in the report.

    Such a fun and fascinating topic to discuss with those who find it interesting.
    So annoying and frustrating to have skeptics (trolls) who feel the need to constantly put you down and crap on everyone else's posts because they have nothing better to do in life.

    #1297 2 years ago
    Quoted from Vyzer2:

    Just fyi, Fox 5 (channel here in NJ) has a special tonight “TMZ investigates UFOs: The Pentagon Proof” at 8pm EST.

    Yes, some new stuff is expected to be revealed and lots of folks seem excited in the UFOlogist forums. Jeremy Corbell is reportedly preparing to drop something new at 7:30PM EST just prior to the show. Looking forward to new info (hopefully). He was just sending out a "UFO red alert" comment on his Twitter feed.

    https://twitter.com/JeremyCorbell?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Eauthor

    #1300 2 years ago

    Just released right now!

    #1326 2 years ago
    Quoted from zaki:

    well. i'd put it this way. what you list are great accomplishments. but they are nothing to the obstacle of interstellar space travel. going to mars may be possible for people. obviously, it won't be easy and isn't probably in our life time. but traveling among the stars is something completely different. its just too far. personally, i do think are aliens out there, but would know the same thing we do...how can you travel so far? your dealing with just space, no air, distances we can't even begin to imagine. what ship can last on a 2,000 year journey? what computer won't break in that time? can anyone live that long...even in some suspended sleep? seems hard to imagine nothing would break or go wrong in space travel. also, look the phsyical effects on scott kelly from 1 year in space.
    i guess my point is, yes there probably are some civilizations in our own galaxy. maybe they have seen our planet. but we are all stuck in our own neighborhoods. the robots on mars are probably the future of all space exploration.

    The hubris to assume we "know" it all now and faster-than-light (FTL) is not possible is amazing. Scientists have already proposed an engine for FTL that would not violate phsyics as we know it currently (which is to say, HARDLY.)

    Look up The Alcubierre drive. It's already just one proposal. Again, where will we be in 500 or 1000 years?
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alcubierre_drive

    Also, I've said it before but it's worth repeating. EVERYTHING we have ever observed using our most sophisticated tools ever ... accounts for 5% of the universe. Just 5%!! The other 95% is dark matter and dark energy and we really have no idea what those things are and we've never directly observed them. We just know they're here somewhere. If we can't even find 95% of the universe how bright are we really?

    #1336 2 years ago
    Quoted from razorsedge:

    I think "5%" is both optimistic and pretty rubbery. 1% seems like it might be more, appropriate ? ...
    Yet still just as rubbery Lol
    I mean, how can anyone "know" exactly how much they "don't know" ?
    We are talking about levitation here some aspects, for example. "Defying gravity". Who ever said it was only about "gravity" though? . Heard of Standing Waves?

    "The more we know!" .... "who knew!?"

    I was referring to the actual science for where we stand to day regarding matter itself ... ALL matter that we know of (from subatomic particles to galaxies and everything we have ever observed) accounts for only 5% of the universe. The other 95% is made up of "dark matter" and "dark energy" that we've never observed directly. We really have no idea what they are. We just know they must exist or else galaxies would fly apart and nothing would be moving (notably away from each other) at the current speeds we've observed. This fact alone (that we can't "find" 95% of the universe and we have no idea what it really is) tells me we're incredibly ignorant in the grand scheme of things.

    #1349 2 years ago
    Quoted from DanQverymuch:

    "We don't know everything, so there are aliens visiting us"? There is a flaw in that logic somewhere.
    Also, I don't recall when gullibility became a virtue. Probably around 2000 years ago.

    Please quote the person you think actually made that statement.

    Nobody made the argument you just shoved in people's mouths. The argument made was against the belief that "science tells us FTL is impossible therefore we'll never reach another solar system and aliens will never be able to visit us here".

    Arrogant egotism certainly isn't a virtue either.

    #1352 2 years ago
    Quoted from DanQverymuch:

    You. You infer as much all the time. It is ludicrous how you think you can arrogantly talk down to someone for simply requiring extraordinary evidence for extraordinary claims. I'm remembering why I had bowed out for a couple of weeks, I don't need this done to my blood pressure.
    And the argument you quote is accurate, FTL is a pipe dream. All new fundamental physics discoveries are achieved by throwing more and more energy at small pieces of matter. It will never translate into "hey, we figured out FTL travel for macro objects."
    And that Luis guy you venerate is full of shit. https://theintercept.com/2019/06/01/ufo-unidentified-history-channel-luis-elizondo-pentagon/

    WTH are you talking about? You did not state you "require extraordinary evidence" any time in recent conversation that I've read. You literally just made up an argument that nobody here made especially myself (nor have I "inferred" it). The discussion has been around whether we can ever achieve faster than light travel someday, period. Many of us believe we aren't nearly as intelligent as we think we are and absolutely it will one day be possible PERIOD.

    Separately, because of this belief, many believe if there is intelligent life out there in our galaxy and they are ahead of us in intellectual evolution, they may well have already figured out FTL and could be visiting.

    Why you always blow up and clearly get angered and emotional because everyone isn't as skeptical (or flat out denialist) as you is your own personal issue. Stay out of the thread if it's impacting your blood pressure.

    #1375 2 years ago
    Quoted from RonSS:

    I'll say this much, that earthquake a few years ago centered at a government facility "China Lake" made me think a little.

    Nahh. It was somewhat openly discussed a few years back that the U.S was developing a bomb specifically designed for the depth and size required to take out Iran's Natanz facility. I wonder where they would test such a device?

    #1377 2 years ago
    Quoted from LTG:

    Maybe Iran's Natanz facility ?
    LTG : )

    I'm pretty confident the United States has never "tested" a weapon for the very first time on an enemy (including 'Trinity' itself before heading to Japan as 'Little Boy').

    #1379 2 years ago

    Good summary of the Omaha incident including the most recently released footage from the deck of the Omaha.

    https://www.mysterywire.com/video/mystery-wire-u-s-s-omaha-ufo-lights-video-adds-to-body-of-evidence/6784411/

    #1382 2 years ago
    Quoted from TRAMD:

    A reasonable scientist or skeptic, like myself (I have degrees in math and physics), doesn't require absolute proof, but does tend to require better evidence than most. Evidence that makes something 90% likely to be true is better than 10% likely, and I think everyone would agree with that. That is the issue I have here. Do I know absolutely that FTL travel (or even light speed travel) is impossible? No. But it is extremely unlikely; with my (humanity's) current knowledge, FAR less than a 1% chance. Is it possible that I don't know something that would increase that probability? Almost definitely. Is it likely that that something would increase the chance to more likely than not? Probably not. But even if we assume that another species elsewhere in the universe has mastered near, at, or faster than light-speed travel. The still wouldn't mean a 100% probability that they have come here. There are many other variables that are also extremely unlikely that have to be met for that to be the case. They would have to have a star of origin close enough to get here, even with extremely fast travel. And as you make the range larger to increase this probability, you have to make the travel speed faster, thereby decreasing the probability that they have achieved such speeds. Then, they have to choose to come see us. They could presumably have many inhabited and uninhabited planets to visit. Let's assume they want to see an inhabited planet to increase the chances they come here. But why choose our planet? Either they have lots of choices (due to lots of inhabited planets) and choosing us becomes less likely or they have few choices (due to relatively few inhabited planets) and the chance that such a civilization exists in close enough proximity decreases. Then we have the probability that such a civilization would have such extraordinary technology and would use it only to spy on some hicks in a cornfield. The more you actually consider these probabilities and then consider the probability of an explanation of terrestrial origin (which is just WAY higher), the more you realize how ludicrous believing these UFOs are alien crafts is. Is it impossible? No, it's just so unlikely that it doesn't warrant real consideration by a rationally thinking person.
    Many of you keep bringing up airplanes, as if people denying that we could make a craft capable of flight is the same as denying the possibility of FTL travel. That is ridiculous and shows a severe lack of ability to properly evaluate the difficult of something (by both posters here and people who thought a flying craft was impossible). There were birds that weighed "more than air" that could fly. We had a working blueprint for how this might be possible before airplanes were invented. A closer example where the airplane argument would hold more water would be against someone saying "humans will never get to Mars".

    If a higher intelligence developed FTL why would they have to be from a point of origin close to us? Presumably, if you can achieve FTL distance and time become less relevant, no?

    As far as "choosing" to visit us, if we found a planet that could host life (and/or we suspected life was there) would we not absolutely want to visit and study life there? Of course we would. And surely they don't have to pick and travel to just one. The same species could be visiting dozens of solar systems simultaneously. And similar to the extreme measures we take from contaminating other bodies we travel to (the moon, mars, asteroids, etc) I suspect a higher intelligence would take great care as to how they introduce themselves (if at all) and how they study us without destroying us accidentally. I think it's logical to expect them to have an appreciation for the fragility of life.

    I think the greatest obstacle to FTL is a sufficient energy source as it would certainly require an immense amount of energy. Bob Lazar always mentioned a type of anti-matter engine in the craft he tried to reverse engineer.

    #1389 2 years ago
    Quoted from TRAMD:Does someone with some intelligence and reason want to respond? No? Probably because such individuals agree with me. You keep stating how we can't know about the technology of a supreme species but then claim to know what they'd want. I have to think you're a troll.

    Umm, you're the one responding with personal attacks. Not me. You're lucky there must not be a mod interested in this thread because you are the one who repeatedly breaks the rules and is the troll.

    I "keep stating" we can't know the technology of a supreme species?? What?? PLEASE QUOTE ME DIRECTLY instead of making my words up. All I've ever suggested is that any intelligent species out there could be thousands of years ahead of us and "they" may very well have solved FTL. Once that occurs, visiting planets within 1000 light years is probably achievable.

    As others have stated, if you find this topic so upsetting and ridiculous then why do you keep posting and bumping it? Why do you keep attacking those of us trying to have a rational conversation?

    -4
    #1397 2 years ago
    Quoted from DCP:

    As I've said before, no discussion about a controversial topic would be worthwhile if only one side was represented. We should be open to everyone's opinions, not just those of the people who have already decided that aliens are visiting us.
    You've called some of us trolls over and over again in this thread. We're not trolls. We're people with a different opinion from you.
    We are all interested in UFOs for some reason or another, or we would not be here. There is no requirement to be in agreement with you for our opinions to be valid and welcome in this thread.
    We don't have to be "True Believers" to be allowed to voice our opinions.
    I think some of these quotes show that you have been trolling us pretty hard. Please stop, and let's return to the discussion.
    You keep promising us that there are going to be amazing new revelations about UFOs.
    We will continue to wait patiently.

    Well you clearly do have a lot of time on your hands but 95% of those are both out of context and NOT a direct personal attack on anyone (much less an attack at all).

    The troll comment is in regards to the few of you who repeat the same statements over and over and over again. "It's impossible". "There would be hig-res video/photos by now". That's not a "side" and it's not even logical argument, just statements you repeat over and over. The rest of us have added new videos, new ideas, and new and relevant news articles and developments that are actually happening.

    BTW, the topic for the thread is not "do you believe aliens are real?"

    #1400 2 years ago
    Quoted from DCP:

    Yet another example of your "impersonal" comments. Keep to the topic and stop with the personal attacks.

    You are literally the only one here who took the conversation off the rails to single me out. Practice what you preach.

    #1402 2 years ago

    This one is getting a fair amount of attention this past week because of how many people witnessed it (in South Carolina). It certainly seems unidentifiable to me albeit not necessarily a "craft" per se (unless it is 'cloaked'). But it does seem odd.

    https://power1051.iheart.com/content/2021-07-06-ufo-stops-traffic-in-south-carolina-as-drivers-film-it/?pname=local_social&keyid=WWPR&sc=editorial&fbclid=IwAR00LEl-jFWAG7GOS1oiFoDIxizO4BgCu_XsjAIZ5iYX6jz4HdQ9w0mwF74

    #1406 2 years ago
    Quoted from Vyzer2:

    I read that many (who saw it first hand) believed it to be a large plastic bag.

    If you click on the second link I shared from a local radio station (below the video) the persons who took that video stated there were actually 2 objects in the sky and they rotated very oddly (not smooth rotation). I don't know but it does look odd.

    #1412 2 years ago

    Great interview between Glenn Beck and Sean Cahill (who was present on the Princeton for the Tic Tac incident)!! Worth the 11 minutes if you're interested in this topic.

    #1419 2 years ago
    Quoted from Elvishasleft:

    said no one ever. Dude is a clown.

    Well, Glenn Beck may be a clown but I thought Sean's story from his perspective on the Princeton was pretty fascinating. There is simply too much evidence to suggest this incident did not happen. So, the only question becomes ... what were these machines?

    If you're a skeptic I have to think your only explanation is that these were from one of our adversaries. But that raises enormous other alarming conclusions (such that they've leaped us in a massive technology breakthrough.)

    If you're open to the idea of other intelligent life then there are countless possibilities but all of them are incredible to even consider (intelligent life somewhere in our own solar system? Life from a different dimension? Intelligent life from a different time? From a different solar system? etc. etc.)

    #1422 2 years ago

    "Citizen Hearing" trailer: https://www.youtube.com/CitizenHearing

    Watch all parts online for free (on the above channel)

    #1425 2 years ago
    Quoted from phil-lee:

    Beginning to doubt the Classic "ET".
    Look closely at the Planets/ Comets/Moons we have photographed.
    No Trees, Weeds, Grass/ Kiss my ass..
    Sorry about that,working on a Song. Anyway, there is nothing growing.
    No Lichen Moss, nothing. Just another rock outpost, hot or cold.
    Why?
    There should be SOMETHING crawling around or infesting flora/fauna.

    Umm, we've only ever landed on 2 planets (and of those, I believe we've only landed a handful of times on Venus with very, very limited communication before the craft died). Beyond that, I believe the only moon we've actually landed on is our own. Sooooo ... I'm thinking we've explored hardly anything even in just our own solar system. In fact, a large percentage of our own Earth has never been explored. We're not as educated as we think!! We're like a newborn infant just now opening our eyes on the Universe (much less our own Galaxy and even our own solar system!!!). James Webb telescope should reveal some amazing discoveries!

    #1434 2 years ago
    Quoted from phil-lee:

    I will say it one more time and quit. Rocks. Dust.
    Our place in the Universe is unique with a diverse ecosystem. Yet nothing developed or exists anywhere near Earth.
    If it was going to happen it would have happened here.

    But Earth is the ONLY planet in our particular solar system's habitable zone as we believe it to be. The only one. We have no pictures of any planet outside of our solar system. None.
    We have just now recently discovered other solar systems which have (in some cases) multiple planets in their own habitable zone. We won't be getting pictures of them any time soon, however.
    One last thought. As we sit right now we are just a snapshot in time. The planets in our solar system were not born in their orbits where they sit now. We believe Mars was likely once inside our habitable zone and had flowing water (and thus, likely plant life at a minimum). So I'm not sure how we can conclude how special (or not) we are given how little we know right now. There could very well be plant life on some of the other moons in our own solar system.

    #1447 2 years ago
    Quoted from phil-lee:

    Enhanced images from Hubble are better than photographs, showing a dozen parameters and detailing planetary characteristics.

    Huh? I'm not aware of Hubble EVER contributing information (much less concrete information) on "planetary characteristics" outside of our own solar system. Never (inside our solar system, of course). If you have a link to an article or other information I'd be interested in reading more.

    That said as I understand, our "best guess" is that those exo-planets between half of Earth’s size to twice its radius are considered terrestrial (rocky) and others may be even smaller. Thus, from that we infer, wheter an exoplanet "MIGHT" be rocky combined with its' distance from its' own sun, we postulate whether it could potentially be habitable. That's it. Nothing concrete to say the least.

    #1491 2 years ago
    Quoted from razorsedge:

    I don't get the downvote by JM though, for providing something that was actually invited by JM?.

    Oh, no, admitedly that is even more information than I was aware of (that Hubble was used for in planet hunting) but it's still next to nothing (when you're looking for direct evidence of plant life). A handful of planet obvervations and "possible" characteristics? And certainly not direct photographic evidence (beyond the technical capture of direct visible light of the one). That was my 'down vote'.
    To read Phil's comment "everywhere we look .. just rocks" I think you need to put that into perspective. We've "looked" almost NOWHERE, lol (albeit we're trying and getting better). We have only clear photographs of planets in our own solar system and as I noted, we're the only planet in the habitable zone of our particular solar system. Additionally, the habitable zone is defined as the range from the a given sun where a planet could potentially have liquid water on its' surface (among other factors) but that doesn't mean life (even plant life) may not exist elsewhere in a solar system. We now know there are other heating processes (radioactive decay, tidal processes, thermal vents, etc) that could also create the necessary elements for life as we know it. We know Jupiter's moon Europa (for example) has a liquid water ocean well below its' surface ... but we have NO idea what kind of life might be down there. Could be all kinds!
    So the point is, we have just barely even opened our eyes so to state "everywhere we look ..." just seems a bit odd to say when you realize how incredibly little we've been able to look at. Scientists now believe there are tens of billions of stars in our Milky Way alone (up to 100 billion stars!) and each one of those may have on average 7 to 10 planets and each one of those could have countless moons.

    #1498 2 years ago
    Quoted from PinballNewb:

    And probably all the same problems that come along with it. Which begs the question, just how likely are other potential interstellar beings to get over the hump of not exterminating themselves before realizing the potential of interstellar travel?

    We're not even sure if we are the first industrialized civilization here on Earth! Most people just assume we are. Think about that, lol. It's plausible several have failed before us right here on Earth.

    https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2018/04/are-we-earths-only-civilization/557180/

    #1522 2 years ago

    Just gonna throw this out there ...

    #1532 2 years ago
    Quoted from phil-lee:

    I am convinced after further research members of the former Soviet Union as well as the US has this technology and are perpetuating a disinformation campaign.

    The Red mercury anti-gravity device "The Bell". Probably the culmination of flying saucer, rocket-powered jets and a possible procurement of Ark of the Covenant.

    There are some serious problems with this theory, however. Notably, "anti-gravity" is not just a single isolated problem to be solved. To create a craft that could actually generate anti-gravity it would still have to have a multitude of other major advances namely materials that could survive the enormous G-forces these craft are moving at (everything from the materials the ship itself is made of to the computer chips/wafers that run it.) Certainly these wouldn't be manned craft as our bodies would not survive. Materials would have to overcome enormous heat and friction as well. Additionally, anti-gravity alone does not explain the trans-medium nature of the witnessed "spherical" craft. Then there's the advanced energy source that keeps these craft aloft for hours and running this high-tech. That's like dozens and dozens of other HIGHLY advanced technologies combined.

    In addition to this, your theory does not explain what these craft are doing in our airspace and restricted waters. In the case of the Tic-Tac for example, it wasn't spying on us or tracking our ships. It was us who intercepted that craft in (on?) our waters. It just doesn't seem to make much logical sense that these (presumably) incredibly highly secret craft would so recklessly be found and intercepted if it were one of our adversaries and if our adversary knew we had similar technology I think they would be picking on lesser nations, no?

    #1533 2 years ago
    Quoted from DanQverymuch:

    The King of Credulity?
    Oh, and JMcDonald, I noticed over my last vacation from this thread's insanity that surely that is not your actual name, barring some crazy coincidence, since I learned that one Jim McDonald was the original UFO nut. Seems disingenuous to use a real-sounding name that is not your own, if you ask me. If that is your actual name, I apologize, but somehow I doubt it.
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_E._McDonald

    Ha ha!! That's pretty funny, lol. I've never heard of that guy before. But then again, McDonald isn't exactly a rare name by any means and my legal first name isn't actually James.

    #1535 2 years ago
    Quoted from phil-lee:

    I am convinced after further research members of the former Soviet Union as well as the US has this technology and are perpetuating a disinformation campaign.

    Yeah, I'm a bit confused now re-reading your first sentence. Do we have this technology or we don't? Is this disinformation campaign 100% a complete farce and these craft do not exist or they exist but are man made?

    Again, if WE developed it then we solved a hundred major problems in numerous areas of science.

    #1541 2 years ago
    Quoted from DanQverymuch:

    Jim McDonald was trying to rally support for UFO investigations clear back in the 60s, claiming that they were the #1 national security risk over 50 years ago!
    50 years later, they're still the same risk? Why have the aliens been sitting on whatever they use for hands for so long?
    Would that all "risks" turn out this benign.
    In another 50 years, someone can quote this post saying "See? Another 50 years have gone by and we still don't know!"

    I'm not certain, but I believe there have been hundreds (thousands?) of people trying to rally support for UFO research for many, many decades, lol. Prominent and respectable persons from scientists to elected officials. It seems the power of a few outweighs the desires of the many.

    #1546 2 years ago
    Quoted from RyanStl:

    Funny, the skeptic is a fan of a conspiracy (maybe not the right term if one guy) that JMcDonald would create a pinside account 4 years ago, just waiting for someone to start a UFO thread on Pinside. LMFAO.

    Shhhhh ... don't blow my current cover for the eventual JFK thread.

    #1556 2 years ago
    Quoted from DanQverymuch:

    Wow, clueless.
    He had to wait so long that he hasn't bothered posting about pinball in years. Why post about them here?

    lol, you want to talk about clueless??? You literally think I came here initially for a reason other then pinball!!!! LOL.

    #1558 2 years ago
    Quoted from DanQverymuch:

    Other than pinball, you mean? I know, homonyms are tough for foreign agents.
    "You" disappeared for two years and came back all horny for UFOs. (Or hijacked a real pinhead's inactive account, which seems more and more likely the more you protest.) So, for whatever reason, apparently "you" don't even like pinball any more, never posting about it. So I ask again, why here?
    And just how does one go about thinking figuratively regarding facts, as opposed to literally? You mean "actually." But I never actually said I thought that in the first place! It's a conjecture, albeit a much more likely one than the one you continually and baselessly espouse and hype.
    Anyways, I came here to post a link to this paper regarding lucid dreaming and ufo sightings and abductions. You know, actual science?
    https://journals.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/index.php/IJoDR/libraryFiles/downloadPublic/265
    To my mind, this sounds like more evidence against other things, too, e.g. ghosts. Most everyone has had dreams so vivid that they can recall them with the clarity of waking memory, and lines get blurred.

    Oh boy, grammar police in full force. Back to the personal attacks I guess, lol. If you want to act intelligent don't pretend "anyways" is a word THEN.

    News flash, I'm simply not a fan of having a major online footprint and leaving personal information everywhere. I really don't have any social media accounts at all. As such, I've chosen to remain "unverified" even here. Well, guess what?? IF you are unverified then there are very few threads you can post in, PERIOD. It's not like I'm not still reading and enjoying a hundred different threads and keeping up on the latest happenings in pinball.

    Mystery solved for you. I hope you can sleep now.

    #1561 2 years ago
    Quoted from DanQverymuch:

    Quite amusing how you take my conjecture seriously.
    Almost as amusing as the UFO blather!
    Oh, and "anyways" is fucking so a word. It is a nonstandard and informal version of "anyway," if the OED works for you. Not sure when Pinside became formal.
    Whenever someone invokes the "grammar police," you know they just got called out for being a dumbass. Your personal attacks on me continue unabated, so buckle up!
    Any comment on the pertinent part of my post? Didn't think so, doesn't fit your agenda. You don't want the truth and never did.

    You literally attack me for not utilizing proper English then attack me again for pointing out you didn't use proper English?? Probably past time you address your anger issues?

    Anyways (resized).pngAnyways (resized).png

    #1572 2 years ago
    Funny (resized).jpgFunny (resized).jpg
    #1573 2 years ago

    The curious case of famous hacker Gary McKinnon ...

    "In his interview with the BBC, he also stated of "The Disclosure Project" that "they are some very credible, relied-upon people, all saying yes, there is UFO technology, there's anti-gravity, there's free energy, and it's extraterrestrial in origin and [they've] captured spacecraft and reverse engineered it." He said he investigated a NASA photographic expert's claim that at the Johnson Space Center's Building 8, images were regularly cleaned of evidence of UFO craft, and confirmed this, comparing the raw originals with the "processed" images. He stated to have viewed a detailed image of "something not man-made" and "cigar shaped" floating above the northern hemisphere, and assuming his viewing would be undisrupted owing to the hour, he did not think of capturing the image because he was "bedazzled", and therefore did not think of securing it with the screen capture function in the software at the point when his connection was interrupted"

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gary_McKinnon

    GaryM (resized).jpgGaryM (resized).jpg
    #1585 2 years ago
    Quoted from PinballKen:

    https://www.reddit.com/r/technews/comments/oslgs8/announcing_a_new_plan_for_solving_the_mystery_of/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=ios_app&utm_name=iossmf
    The newly organized Galileo Project will use a three-pronged approach to replace unreliable eyewitness reports with reproducible scientific observations

    I liked this statement more clearly defining the problem of why we don't have "definitive proof" up to this point in time.

    "Similarly, one-time events—miracles, for example—do not have scientific credibility. Science rests on reproducible results that can be replicated by creating similar circumstances over and over again."

    BTW, a direct link to the Scientific American article:
    https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/announcing-a-new-plan-for-solving-the-mystery-of-unidentified-aerial-phenomena/

    #1587 2 years ago
    Quoted from Fytr:

    Here's a good video that explains very clearly why it is all but impossible for intelligent aliens to have detected us yet, much less do so and travel here.

    And AGAIN, that was based on CURRENT knowledge and understanding. We literally have no clue what makes up 95% of the "stuff" (dark matter and dark energy) in our universe. You do understand that the Theory Of Relativity is STILL just a theory, right?? And it has NEVER been reconciled with quantum mechanics, right? We're CLEARLY missing a HUGE portion of our understanding of reality. Heck, scientists used to think we would never be able to directly oberve or detect an exoplanet because of the vastness of space, but guess what? We found a way. And (also once again) we've already had physicists predicting ways to move multiple times faster than the speed of light without even breaking the field theory equations of Einstein's theory.

    So maybe, just maybe ... we're nowhere near as bright as some of us assume we are.

    #1590 2 years ago
    Quoted from Fytr:

    Magical thinking at its finest.

    I literally stated multiple facts and you respond with "Magical thinking"?? Seriously?
    Did YOU even watch the video of this wannabe no-name guy with a YouTube channel?
    "We know of 15 stars within 10 light-years of Earth ... but it's worth noting we didn't even know 3 of those (Brown Dwarf stars) were there until 2011 to 2013." OHHH ... so you mean we're learning new things about our relatively CLOSE neighbors all the time? Shocker.
    "David Palmer in 1998 estimated 14,600 stars within 5 parsecs (our most accurate star catalog) ... 16.3 light-years. "
    "The CURRENT catalog (GAIA) ... accurate up to 10 parsecs or 32.6 light-years .. this works out to 13,322 stars within a 100 light-year RADIUS (not diameter ... radius)."
    He is literally speaking about the likelihood of life and the problems with red and brown dwarfs in this video. We literally have no idea whether there is other life beyond Earth right here in our own solar system!!!
    Then he's talking about the attenuation problem and whether aliens could detect our radio signals?? HUH?? Why not just look at the gas in our atmosphere?!? Significant CO2 change MAYBE?!?
    Then he speaks of G and K class stars ... that exist IN the habitable zone (our current definition and understanding of what is "habitable" which does not include Moons) ... WITHIN 10 parsecs .. just 4 (as he looks shocked)!! ... unless you extend that out to 100 light-years and then it's more like 115 stars.
    Even this estimate is a REMARKABLY NEGATIVE outlook still utilizing the Drake Equation from 6 DECADES AGO. Are you kidding me?!? How can this equation be taken seriously when 6 decades later we still aren't even able to tell if there is life on moons around Jupiter and Saturn?? We have no clue how prevalent life is in our own solar system (literally) and based on our current understanding we are the only planet in our own self-defined habitable zone.

    What did that have to do with explaining why we'll never contact extraterrestrial life or why they could never be visiting here NOW?? Can you guys just take your trolling to some other thread, please?

    #1592 2 years ago
    Quoted from TRAMD:

    And just like many of us don't know what we don't know, some of these types of arguments don't have a clear grasp on scales of difficulty and the concepts of orders of magnitude. To someone who does, these kind of arguments (like the Wright brothers argument) sound like this:
    Me: "Nobody will ever skip a rock a billion times in one throw."
    Guy: "People used to think someone would never skip a rock 30 times but at the World rock skipping contest, some guy skipped a rock 50 times! And computer models have shown how skipping one 500 times is possible!"

    I don't understand the emphasis on this. A 100 light-year radius is FAR more space than a 100 light year diameter.

    My issue with your analogy is that you are comparing something with a definitive (and very limited) number of KNOWN factors to something (whether extraterrestrial from elsewhere has found us) that has a million factors the overwhelming majority of which we are yet to understand.

    As for the "radius" comment, yes, however, I read that as ... this is an estimate of the number of stars in one direction (180 degrees) out to 100 light-years, the radius. Versus, here is the estimated number of stars in 100 light-years in all directions (360 degrees.)

    #1595 2 years ago
    Quoted from Fytr:

    That's just a b.s. get out of jail free card. We know a lot more than you'd like to admit.

    NO ... WE DON"T. You really think we're anywhere close to knowing and understanding how everything in the universe works? Really?

    All that you believe comes down to one question, is FTL possible? The answer is, we don't know. If it is, then all of your arguments regarding the vastness of space become almost meaningless. Our current understanding of FTL is based on a theory (General Theory Of Relativity) proposed more than a century ago and we've since come to understand we're missing some major pieces of the puzzle somewhere and even have physicists proposing ideas for FTL that don't violate that theory.

    Our government has now told you that UFO's are real. In the majority of cases that have been documented by the military over the past 2 decades only one could be explained. And oh, they can't rule out an extraterrestrial source.

    #1598 2 years ago
    Quoted from Luckydogg420:

    I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again
    Inter-dimensional not inter-planetary is more likely

    I've said repeatedly I believe that's one option. But I personally disagree it's any more likely than other possibilities.

    If FTL is possible, then distance becomes almost meaningless. Most everyone seems to believe intelligent life IS out there somewhere.

    I'm confident we'll have FTL communication one day too. That is, we'll be able to communicate vast distances (light years possibly) instantaneously by taking advantage of bizarre quantum mechanic laws such as quantum entanglement (which I think scientists already achieved on a 1-bit level?)

    #1600 2 years ago

    Odd object. I'd say it could be a deflating weather balloon but that would be tough to explain how it keeps up with a plane traveling several hundred miles per hour for 7 minutes.

    https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/15708984/plane-passenger-shape-shifting-ufo/?utm_campaign=native_share&utm_source=sharebar_native&utm_medium=sharebar_native

    #1602 2 years ago

    Here is an updated video of all the footage taken of the "UFO in Turkey" incident from 2009 (I hadn't seen this before). This object was spotted hovering for more than a 3 hour period over a few different nights and various snippets of video were taken over that week. This was apparently witnessed by dozens of Turks. Some brief moments in the video are a bit eerie IMO.

    #1605 2 years ago
    Quoted from DanQverymuch:

    "No way ... "
    "Nonsense. "
    "Hoax."

    Wow, well that is a well-thought-out and logical argument. Great job. Another bizarre sighting DEBUNKED!

    #1608 2 years ago
    Quoted from DanQverymuch:

    Yeah, leave out the points I made about ludicrous, obvious things in the video. Great summary!
    You're not even trying to argue anything, just to piss me off so I leave. Nice try! Are you capable of not being disingenuous?
    Are you saying a human, hand-held camera could zoom like that and remain steady enough? Then say it.
    Are you saying chase lights make sense? Then say it.
    Are you saying the lights only being on in the daytime makes sense? Then say it.
    I'm saying they are nonsense.
    And yes, I'm saying it was a hoax due to these issues. Do you want to rebut them, or just be a butthead?
    You never answer questions, though, I just hope everyone else notices that.

    There was a single question mark in your entire post and I didn't realize that was a serious question versus rhetorical.

    But okay, let's pretend that was a valid question. First of all, what aircraft do humans have that utilize "chase lights", can stay aloft for hours at a time, and are silent (much less have the shape of this object)? I can hear a helicopter from miles away. Even a drone would make more sound (all that I've witnessed), could never stay aloft that long, are not that stable especially at a higher altitude over water. So what are YOU suggesting it is? Just complete CGI? If not manmande then what you call "chase lights" could be utilized for a countless other number of reasons we can only speculate on (communication? Sensors? Offset the bright light of our own sun?) I have no idea what they are being used for. But for someone to go such extreme lengths to make such a quality looking video only to be tripped up by "oh shoot, I shouldn't have shown chase lights" seems like a very ridiculous claim.

    And YES, I'm saying it's possible to hold a camera that steady with zoom (which I still thought was pretty shakey.) Good Lord, for all the complaints we hear of UFO videos questioning why nobody can hold a camera still, now we have to debate why someone could hold a camera fairly still??

    How about you give a little bit more thought as to why and HOW this was faked beyond such oversimplified quick trash talk BS? And maybe there is an innocent explanation!! A little bit better justification and explanation would be appreciated versus immediately jumping to "HOAX", "Nonsense!"!!!!!

    #1616 2 years ago
    Quoted from DCP:

    Hmmm, another grainy, shaky 1950s-style video, even though it was shot in 2009. UFOs are definitely still avoiding good cameras and competent photographers.

    Did you watch the whole video? It was a compilation of 4 or 5 videos taken over a 3 day period. I agree some points were too blurry or too shakey (ironically, someone <cough cough> claimed it was TOO STEADY) but other parts were clear enough to say "WTH is that"? Again, purportedly dozens of folks witnessed seeing the object that week.

    Another point, try taking video with your quality phone camera some time (of an airliner flying overhead for example). See how good you can do. Taking video of something moving ... likely a mile or more away from you and likely at some altitude. It's not easy. THEN ... factor in the frequent descriptions of these craft from even the most credible witnesses (military). They describe smooth surfaces, no windows, no propulsion, and just general "shapes". So you try taking "clear" video of an object like that and what are the odds someone doesn't dismiss it as a balloon or a cloud or something innocent. Even if the object displays lights then you have folks claiming "chase lights in the day?? HOAX". It never ends.

    Quoted from DCP:

    Concrete evidence of alien visitors is lacking, despite many eyewitness reports and tales of alien autopsies, reverse engineering of ufo engines, etc. Until someone actually shows evidence of any of these things (talking about seeing something is not "evidence"), we are no closer to knowing what UFOs really are.

    "Knowing" what they are definitively? No, perhaps we're not close to that. However, you just had the United States government admit they have multiple sources of different types of radar data, combined with multiple eye witnesses in multiple different aircraft from different perspectives ALL witnessing and confirming a "craft" whose movements are unexplained (and confirmed it was NOT U.S technology). IE. UFO's exist. I don't know how you get any more credible than that. There is zero innocent explanation in that case.

    #1618 2 years ago
    Quoted from razorsedge:

    How exactly do you presume this is "confirmed" ?

    The Pentagon themselves confirmed it was not ours. Could they be lying? Really? So now it comes back to "you can't trust our government"? So, you can't trust individuals when they see something. You can't trust hundreds of citizens who saw something even with a dozen videos (say, the Phoenix incident for example.) Now, you can't even trust MULTIPLE different EX-military personnel, combined with multiple advanced radar data, combined with admissions from the government (hell, even President Obama admitting it's true). Our government must be lying and we DO in fact have craft that literally defy physics as the general public (all scientists and intellectuals from our most regarded institutions) know it to be today.

    This really puts it back to ... until a UFO lands on the White House lawn, on LIVE TV, with 10K people present, and shake hands with the President ... AND (and this is KEY) ... a majority of humans agree it's real, then it's not real. That last part seems to be the true key. Until a majority of people on Earth agree it's real (until the majority of MEDIA present it as "real"), it will remain in doubt. People are incapable of reaching rational conclusions on their own. And I don't mean that as snarky but sadly, that may be reality.

    #1625 2 years ago
    Quoted from RonSS:

    I can't remember if this was listed here or not, so please forgive me if it's a repeat.
    I find this fairly fascinating. I haven't delved into it further, but I've gotta say, seems like an intense training mission if that is the truth!

    The Pentyrch UFO

    I have not seen this before so thanks for sharing. A fascinating account with a LOT of detail (and more than one witness) apparently with other corroborating evidence (such as the seismic activity logs). A craft (pyramid shape) similar to many other sightings along with green orbs similar to other sightings as well. Fascinating (to me anyway.)

    #1632 2 years ago

    Fun conjecture(?) IF we have proven quantum entanglement is real how does that not prove FTL (even if it's just "information") is real?

    https://www.extremetech.com/extreme/295013-scientists-capture-photographic-proof-of-quantum-entanglement

    Are scientists wrong and it is just conjecture? Or are they right and "something" is moving faster than light (FTL)? WHICH IS IT?

    #1637 2 years ago
    Quoted from DCP:

    <sigh> The US Government has done no such thing! They have never confirmed any of the objects are a "craft" of any kind.
    They have also most definitely NOT ever said they were "not US technology".

    Huh??? Are you not familiar with recent news or are you still just in denial? I'm not sure what your source of choice is for "credible" information but the Pentagon has confirmed that released military videos are the REAL deal. They have confirmed that objects seen on video coincide with confirmed radar data (multiple sources of multiple types of radar data simultaneously). They have confirmed they have no explanation and incidents remain unexplained. You have multiple EYE witnesses (including 'Chad' noted in the video above as well as Top Gun graduate David Fravor.) Are you just hung up on the word "craft"?? These are objects demonstrating movements not explainable by physics as we know it today (again, confirmed by multiple radar data and human eyewitnesses). They have stated multiple times publicly they are not our own technology. The Pentagon "report" lists possible explanations (including "other") as well as foreign technology as explanations. Being "our own technology" was not listed as a possible explanation.

    https://www.cnn.com/2021/04/15/politics/unidentified-aerial-phenomena-defense-department/index.html

    Also, PLEASE explain how exactly does one create "repeatable" UFO sightings?? PLEASE explain that one. I'm back to what it will take to convince some folks of the reality right in front of them (ie. the media TELLING YOU "it's real, you can believe now", after a UFO lands on the White House lawn and shakes the President's hand?)

    #1644 2 years ago
    Quoted from phil-lee:

    Lets cut to the chase.
    A higher power that created everything has been intimately involved with mankind from the beginning.
    This power decided to use these things to monitor and intercede. They have been documented from early on with cave drawings, fine art paintings, carved figurines and first hand accounts from ancient text.
    They have the ability to defy physics because the laws were created by this higher power.
    So this higher power knows how to break these rules and create these things that defy these laws.
    We will NEVER find out the truth until/unless we meet this higher power.
    You will never figure it out, nothing will ever be revealed, in much the same way we will never understand the construction of the Megalith and Monoliths all over the World.
    This knowledge has remained hidden from the beginning and will remain so until the higher power decides to reveal it.
    Until then continue to explore,dream and research, its fun.

    Well, that's one theory!

    You had me until "They have the ability to defy physics because the laws were created by this higher power".
    I don't believe they defy phsyics but they know the rules so well it can appear they are defying physics (as we know it) when they are not. In your scenario it appears you believe there is a single higher species/intelligence? I think there are several who have reached "master level" understanding of the physics of our universe.

    Also, as part of your theory, you seem to believe "we" (as in, all of humanity?) will never know the truth when in fact, I think there is a very small number of folks (in the military/government) who already know the truth. I hope all of humanity is allowed to know the truth in my lifetime.

    #1645 2 years ago
    Quoted from DCP:

    No, I'm not in denial. They keep using the word "unidentified" to describe the sightings. That means they don't know what they are. They don't know if they're a "craft", an "object", or an illusion.
    They just plain don't know what they are.
    No one has "admitted" anything about the origin of UFOs. They still are only saying they don't know what they are.
    Anything else you are reading into these reports is a product of your imagination.
    The government reports seem like they are designed to make people jump to conclusions without them having to actually admit anything. This seems like a big misdirection campaign to take our attention away from something else.
    There's definitely more to this story than some supposed "new" information coming from the US government. It appears to be a very deliberate disinformation / misinformation campaign, perhaps some kind of test to see how gullible we are about the UFO issue.

    Yes, the government has stated they don't know what they are but they have confirmed they are real and not an illusion. Advanced radar and sensors have confirmed they are REAL objects. Multiple human beings have confirmed they are real objects as seen with their own eyes! They have confirmed they cannot explain the speeds, change in direction, and trans-medium nature of these objects.

    For you to pretend this could still be swamp gas or a weather balloon blows my mind, personally. There is not some innocent explanation. There is a reason the military is concerned.

    #1657 2 years ago

    Coming tomorrow (tonight at midnight?) Looking forward to this new series.

    https://www.netflix.com/search?q=top%20secret&jbv=81018709

    #1667 2 years ago

    Great video of a guy who had a UFO experience and made a model of it (inspired only after hearing David Fravor's account of the "Tic Tac" incident). Very good detail of his own account. Certainly sounds like he saw "something" to me.

    #1670 2 years ago

    Another odd one caught on CCTV. Some folks refer to these as "cigar shaped" UFO's, however, this appears exactly like a "rod" to me. If you're not familiar with "rods" Google them. There are countless videos of these (just as the name suggests) rod-like objects that move at incredible speeds. They generally appear like a straight line with 3 points (one on each end and one in the middle). They move so fast and are so thin it's almost impossible to see them with the naked eye, but they've been caught on video countless times. I realize many will play them off as bugs (despite their inexplicable speeds and maneuvers) but they are curious nontheless. IF there is such a higher intelligence visiting I could imagine a probe or sensor of this design so as to go undetected by us.

    #1676 2 years ago

    News flash, they aren't waiting to hear radio signals from us. They've been visiting us long before we were smart enough to know what radio waves are.

    Also, something tells me they're way ahead of us in communications and they are no longer using radio to communicate among themselves. Scientists have long predicted that the time in which intelligent species utilize radio waves could just be a blip on the evolution timeline (which is why SETI has had little success finding them).

    https://www.csmonitor.com/Science/2010/0929/Aliens-will-be-harder-to-find-after-they-stop-using-radio-signals-study-suggests

    #1680 2 years ago
    Quoted from Fytr:

    Well that's a remarkable assertion! Where's your evidence?

    I literally gave you an article loaded with facts about humanity's move away from radio to digital communication. The entire article describes why we could be having such a hard time detecting alien life if we really expect them to still be using radio. I think it's a pretty reasonable assumption to think any intelligent civilization out there more advanced than us likely also moved past using radio fairly quickly and would conclude it would not be worth looking for to identify life elsewhere.

    That article aside, we have millions of people who claim to have seen or encountered UFO's we can't explain which leads me to believe that at least some of them are legitimate and one of three possibilities for their origin is from another solar system (the other possibilities being from a different dimension or possibly from a different time).

    Here is a great new video dispelling the debunkers who have offered up theories on the Tic Tac incident which to date is the most credible and detailed UFO sighting (most evidenced) ever IMO.

    #1685 2 years ago

    It's so easy to be a skeptic.

    Let's get our vocabulary correct first. "Evidence" versus "proof".
    Until 1898 we had zero proof of subatomic particles. Zero.
    Until 1945 we had zero proof a nuclear bomb would work. Zero.
    Until 1988 we had zero proof that exoplanets existed. Zero.

    2021 ... we have zero proof that life (ANY life) exists elsewhere beyond Earth

    Yes, until definitive proof is acknowledged by the masses then we collectively don't believe it's true. But how you cannot listen to multiple military experts who witnessed object(s) with their own eyes, recorded by multiple types of cameras, confirmed by multiple types of sensors, and from multiple different craft (aircraft and ships alike) ... ALL confirming a physical object with unexplainable movements based on physics as we know it .. and still not call that "evidence" is beyond me. We have evidence, we don't have proof. Maybe they are just drones from elsewhere (unoccupied). Maybe they are coming from a different dimension or from a different time. But I think we have VERY strong "evidence" that UFO's are indeed real and we need to investigate further (and the government is clearly not telling us everything they know.) Something more intelligent than us must exist.

    #1689 2 years ago
    Quoted from DCP:

    Really? I think it's way easier to just believe whatever you imagine.
    Real evidence and proof is a lot harder to come by than many people realize. That's why the "objects" are still being described as unidentified. If there is better evidence, it has not ever been shown or leaked.
    There have been lots of similar UFO reports mostly coming from the US military over the past few decades.
    We don't appear to be any closer to knowing what UFOs are than we were in the 1960s or 1970s.

    This is precisely why it's easy to be a skeptic ... up until the point there is definitive proof staring you in the face you still have current understanding on your side (which, at this point is where we stand in regards to alien life visiting Earth, NO definitive proof, at least not being shown to us) . Skeptics (including Einstein himself) originally said a nuclear bomb would never be possible. Skeptics (including many famous scientists) said heavier than air flight would never be possible. Skeptics said we'd never be able to directly detect exoplanets. But ultimately, all of these things proved to be possible.

    Up until the point the proof is staring everyone in the face the snarky skeptics always appear to be on higher ground and presumably "truth" is on their side.

    HOWEVER, as Charles Dickens first wrote famously "never say never".

    And I think the fact that we finally have our government admitting that UFO's are in fact real (regardless of what you think they are or where they come from) is HUGE PROGRESS toward the truth. The Tic Tac incident, in particular, is the most detailed, most witnessed, most evidenced, and MOST inexplicable event to ever be documented, confirmed to have happened, and reported. I'm thinking that puts us a LOT closer to the truth from just a few decades ago when the government denied everything, never allowed military personnel to be interviewed or discuss events, and never corroborated multiple sources of data.

    #1692 2 years ago
    Quoted from DCP:

    I'm not following your reasoning here.

    "up until the point there is definitive proof staring you in the face you still have 'current understanding' on your side"

    Quoted from DCP:

    And it was Einstein the skeptic who did make it possible, by being skeptical of his own work until he knew he had a usable theory.

    ...because skeptical scientists persisted until they had repeatable and provable results.
    They didn't become possible because someone wished they were possible, or because the "true believers" convinced the skeptics.
    Skepticism is a useful skill that produces indisputable results.

    You're treating skeptics as persons who are optimistic. In my mind true skeptics are those who will NEVER believe something up until the point someone else shows them it's true or possible (case in point, several people here in this thread).

    And Einstein did NOT create the atomic bomb. He didn't believe it was possible. Yes, it was his equation and his initiative that started the search for an atomic bomb, but he never worked on it directly.

    #1693 2 years ago
    Quoted from DCP:

    ...and you are still reading a whole lot into the government reports that isn't really there.
    They've worded the reports very carefully to make you think that they know some secret info that we don't.
    The ambiguity of their statements is designed to spark your imagination and make you think the government knows something about aliens and UFOs.
    Don't buy into their propaganda. This is nothing new.

    Huh? It's a fact that Congress was given a lengthy 'classified' supplemental briefing in conjunction with the public UFO report. That happened. I'm not making it up. Several Congress members made comments to their various levels of shock and surprise. It's a fact the public did not get all of the information.

    It's also a FACT that the government has admitted UFO's are real. President Barack Obama himself confirmed as much. That also happened. Did they confirm they are from an extraterrestrial source? No. Did they confirm they are even "manned" craft? No. But they absolutely did confirm the objects are real, we don't know what they are, AND they apparently have abilities that defy physics as we know it. That all just happened if it hasn't sunken in yet for you. There is not some innocent explanation.

    #1694 2 years ago
    Quoted from JMcDonald:

    There is not some innocent explanation.

    This reminds me, this is a good question and time to ask: WHAT ARE THE POSSIBLE EXPLANATIONS FOR THE WELL DOCUMENTED TIC-TAC INCIDENT?

    Let's compile a list of the plausible explanations given that we have multiple types of cameras, multiple sensors, multiple craft (aircraft and ships alike), AND multiple eyewitnesses all involved in the same incident. All corroborated. What are the possible explanations? I'll start the list:

    1) It's another super power nation with technology that has leap-frogged us by many decades (if not centuries) and our intelligence failed us
    2) Our government is 100% lying to us, the event never happened, all of the witnesses, all of the video, and all of the data is 100% a complete fabrication possibly meant as disinformation
    3) It's a DARPA craft that the rest of our military is not privy to and for some reason it was moving in and out of an active Navy area
    4) It truly is an unknown advanced civilization craft, manned or unmanned, visiting (either from another dimension, another time, or another solar system)

    Am I missing other possibilities? What's your personal favorite explanation?

    #1727 2 years ago
    Quoted from DCP:

    I would like to clear something up. I am not the negative skeptic some of you try to say that I am. I would be fascinated and amazed, just like you, if we ever see real evidence of UFOs being alien craft.

    I learned from Dad and others about critically examining evidence, and how to tell if you have proved something or not.

    You literally have just had laid in your lap the greatest amount of evidence EVER documented in our history of a single UFO encounter (and that's just the info the government is willing to confirm and share!!) The U.S military has absolutely, 100%, CRITICALLY examined TONS of evidence of this incident from our most sophisticated sensors, radars, and cameras EVER in the history of mankind. Nobody, NOBODY has more incentive and resources to find an answer in identifying a UFO. They have told YOU they cannot explain what was witnessed firsthand, they have told you it seemingly defies physics (BS that's me reading into something, the government stated as much including analysis of ballistic missile radars, plural, tracking an inexplicable object) observed directly both by humans (plural) and machines, . YET ... you are still right here claiming "there is no evidence". What?!? Go back and read my recent post about my own frustration with people confusing the terms "evidence" and "proof". YES, we have incredible EVIDENCE right now. Incredibly STRONG evidence!! Not of extraterristrials but of "something" that has greater intelligence than us all around us. This is NEW and major progress!!!

    SO sorry you need alien bodies laid in your lap before you'll believe anything but the government is just not quite ready to do that for you. They know far too many of you could not handle reality. That's the real truth.

    Your other recent posts claiming it could be a "bad sensor" (you are wrong in claiming they never had "distance") or "weather balloon" are absolutely pathetic and flat-out lies at this point (ALL of those weak and simple explanations have been debunked). Those things have ALL been completely 100% ruled out!!! SO again, I submit the list of possible explanations that actually remain:

    1) It's another super power nation with technology that has leap-frogged us by many decades (if not centuries) and our intelligence failed us
    2) Our government is 100% lying to us, the event never happened, all of the witnesses, all of the video, and all of the data is 100% a complete fabrication possibly meant as disinformation
    3) It's a DARPA craft that the rest of our military is not privy to and for some reason it was moving in and out of an active Navy area
    4) It truly is an unknown advanced civilization craft, manned or unmanned, visiting (either from another dimension, another time, or another solar system)

    #1729 2 years ago
    Quoted from Fytr:

    It's fully explained here, all you need is the ability to read a FLIR screen, as described in detail by the video author:

    Tic Tac videos are typically planes viewed from particular angles.
    All of these "sightings" boil down to viewer confusion, misrepresentation, or outright fraud. Your fantasy list of "explanations" are all so unlikely as to be next to impossible.

    UMM, no. It's ALL explained here by top scientists, military experts, and those who KNOW the technology we're talking about. Go bury your head again.

    #1730 2 years ago

    AND I reiterate .. the miltiary THEMSELVES are telling you they cannot explain what was witnessed and what happened. They have ALL the money and resources to do the most in-depth investigation possible (not your pathetic YouTubers with a "channel"). The military cannot explain it. So AGAIN refer to my list of possibilities. This is not explainable TO ... THIS ... DAY.

    #1733 2 years ago
    Quoted from DCP:

    That's exactly what I keep saying - the military has not explained what the UFOs are. They remain UNIDENTIFIED, just as they have for years.
    Not aliens, not physics-defying. Unidentified.

    You are either lying or completely not willing to read the FACTS of the case. That's now a FACT.

    YES, they are "unexplained". YES, they are "UNIDENTIFIED". But you continue to NOT acknowledge the SIGNIFICANT EVIDENCE that these objects are real and SO significant that they cannot be explained. IF the military could explain the physics with which these objects moved they would say SO!!!! BUT they apparently CANNOT!!! Our most advanved technology, containing multiple sources with multiple types of our most advanved techonolgy, COMBINED WITH MULTIPLE HUMAN EYES ...ALL paint a picture of an intelligent craft we cannot explain much less when we consider physics as we know it.

    For you to STILL pretend there is a potential innocent explanation is just flat-out ignorance and denial at this point.

    There is NO innocent explanation and my previous list of possible explanations are all that exist.

    #1738 2 years ago
    Quoted from BMore-Pinball:

    Just to clear something up, UFO's are not defying the laws of physics - they are defying our understanding of the laws of physics

    I am pretty sure the government has a few ideas
    Regardless of their origin, I am 100% positive they have much clearer images of them and more technical info than they have released

    Myself, I have always clarified that it is "physics as we know it". I have also argued that scientisits know there is a LOT we don't know which is reason to believe that FTL (or seemingly faster than light) is possible, we just haven't figured it out yet but that doesn't mean someone else hasn't.

    #1753 2 years ago
    Quoted from BMore-Pinball:

    Sure, just look how many people believe in religion and a supreme being

    I certainly do believe in God but I honestly don't think it's a "need". I just sense it's true so to speak. I feel his presence in my life.

    Now, by definition I think God is alien. The Bible tells us we were only created in his likeness. Whether there are countless other intelligent species out there, I have no idea, but I suspect there is this one higher intelligence above all others (God).

    #1760 2 years ago
    Quoted from Fytr:

    "Reality as we know it"

    No. Phsyics. We KNOW something is wrong with our understanding and we don't understand it. We KNOW we don't understand true reality. It's our understanding of physics specifically that we know is wrong but we don't currently have a better explanation. Just theories.

    #1770 2 years ago
    Quoted from Mr_Outlane:

    Well given that something like 85% of the mass in the observable universe is dark matter and dark energy and we have no idea WTF that is, I would say you're right. Hawking thought the grand unified theory of everything was maybe 20 years off. I suspect we may never have it. But what do I know?

    Actually, it's 95%!! All around us and we've never directly observed it (dark matter and dark energy that is). We have no idea what "it" is. Some theories such as string theory predict multiple other dimensions where this stuff may exist (the best version of string theory currently says there are 10 dimensions, for various reasons.) But humans cannot contemplate the idea of another dimension all around them that they are incapable of perceiving any better than humans can truly comprehend the vastness of the universe. We always try to use analogies (ex. "if the Earth was the size of a marble then ...") but this still falls far short of true understanding.

    #1772 2 years ago

    Just released 8/20/2021. A true deathbed confession of an ex-CIA agent.

    #1783 2 years ago

    Have you watched the documentary Patient 17 yet?? It's an absolutely fascinating story and it's now free (albeit with commercials). I recall being very skeptical before watching it but when you get to the accredited Nano Physicist (55 minute mark) and his astonishment, it got really real.

    https://tubitv.com/movies/552440/patient-seventeen?start=true

    1 week later
    #1796 2 years ago

    OKay, lol. First claim in the video ... "developed from top-secret Nazi research captured from WWII". Umm. at a time super powers (Soviets and U.S) were racing to create a crude "nuclear" bomb, you're telling me the Nazis were already conducting advanced anti-gravity research with nuclear energy?! LOL.
    Yes, the TR3B has long been rumored to exist but what this video decided to leave out was that along with the TR3B rumor is that it is believed to be our attempt at reverse-engineering alien technology. If the TR 3B exists I think it's more than likely we actually have captured alien technology and our military knows aliens are real.
    Also note, the TR 3B does not look anything like a "tic tac" soooo.

    #1798 2 years ago
    Quoted from Yipykya:

    I think they do mention in the video a theory about some believe this technology was reverse engineered from alien tech.
    And the tic tac ship will remain the new top secret as the tr3b inevitably gains more public awareness.
    What better way to test the next generations tic tac stealth tech then letting the Navy guys that aren't "in the loop" see it and try to explain it with their best equipment?
    See? Everything doesn't have to be Aliens. LoL

    Sure, that makes sense. Let's test out our most secretive and advanced new craft by dropping it from 80k+ feet down to sea level inside an active Navy training area where the Navy will scramble to intercept our craft (which is "roiling the ocean" for some reason), possibly even fire on our craft, and then we'll just take off and disappear in the blink of an eye. Sounds like a smart way to test this technology.

    You're already in the "process of revelation" which took a major step forward with the recent verification of the tic-tac incident. Hundreds of ex-military and intelligence officials and scientists have tried to tell you over many decades. It simply takes some longer than others to realize the obvious "oh".

    #1802 2 years ago

    New video released by MUFON. Release 9/7/21 but originally captured on 8/15/21. Speaking of TR 3B?

    #1806 2 years ago
    Quoted from DCP:

    It's really too bad that the only "UFO" videos that have been coming out lately are fuzzy little unidentifiable dots.
    Just like all the others from the past half-century of poor photography.
    How incredibly worthless and boring.
    Videos like this contribute nothing to our knowledge of UFOs.

    Once again, we've heard your complaint (same one) repeatedly. I'm sorry alien intelligence does not wish to fly lower and stop and pose for pictures for you. If it's so boring to you then why do you keep coming back to this thread simply to troll those of us who are interested in the subject and are curious about sightings?? Stay away, pretty simple.

    #1808 2 years ago
    Quoted from DCP:I'm glad to see that you remain as open-minded as ever. Sorry for popping your bubble and disagreeing with you.
    There are multiple points of view in this world.
    Not all of us are as gullible as you.

    Being open minded to what?! To being ridiculed for questioning strange objects in the sky?? To thinking there just might be something very odd going on with our existence? Good Lord, give me a break. All you do is cry that videos aren't clear enough and definitive enough for you and IF you had a clear up-close picture of something unexplainable you would still dismiss it as CGI or a hoax. Great, MOVE ON. Can we not simply share videos and pictures and have an open conversation to discuss possibilities without being called "gullible" and treated as morons and you're the one who knows all?? MOVE ON. Where are the mods now??

    1 week later
    #1818 2 years ago

    Very impressive "fake". Hollywood could not do better.

    #1819 2 years ago

    lol.

    pasted_image (resized).pngpasted_image (resized).png
    1 week later
    1 week later
    #1847 2 years ago
    Quoted from RonSS:

    Yes very. Transporting something uncovered, in broad daylight, on a flatbed. With an apparent short cell phone video and I'm guessing a worker seeming surprised at what his company produces?
    Almost seems like an after-school special.
    Sorry, not biting on this one.

    Well, first off, they showed this was in fact clearly on Skunkworks property. But, you're "not biting on this one" is pretty funny, lol. When would you ever "bite"? When you see a close-up of a label "Made in Alpha Centauri"? It's an honest question as videos and photos are never clear enough or close enough for the true skeptic and when you do see something bizarre close-up you still dismiss it as man-made. So what would you see that would ever make you go"Whoa, there's no way we built that"?
    This may well be man-made but it certainly could be an attempt at reverse engineering something alien. To say this would be a leap in technological advancement would be an understatement. Where is there room for propulsion here? What kind of propulsion?
    I now you guys give DARPA credit for being decades ahead of what we know but this thing looks centuries ahead.

    1 month later
    #1909 2 years ago

    New video. Very legit from doorbell camera.

    #1942 2 years ago

    DNI Avril Haines admits possibility of aliens! One thing that is undeniable right now ... after nearly a full century of our government denying it 100% they are now (repeatedly) telling us unidentified aerial objects are real, there are inexplicable attributes, and the possibility of aliens is real. They ARE saying it.

    https://nypost.com/2021/11/11/ufos-buzzing-us-warships-may-be-aliens-top-spy-chief/

    #1949 2 years ago
    Quoted from DCP:

    We should be seeing JMcDonald getting dragged into a UFO by the aliens very soon...
    [quoted image]

    I would go voluntarily! lol.

    1 month later
    #1964 2 years ago

    Here's a new video I haven't seen before (actually 2). They show 5 videos in total but 2 in particular I've never seen (the other 3 we've seen plenty I think). In one the object seemingly splits into 2 objects and the second is taken from a tank's FLIR camera. ALL of these videos are taken by the military and all remain unexplained.

    #1977 2 years ago
    Quoted from DCP:

    Therefore, UFOs are in fact travelers from other planets visiting us. I see no other explanation.

    The fact that they're taken by the military (and remain unexplained) simply adds a LOT of credibility to them versus someone taking a blurry video of a dot in the sky miles away on their phone. It is literally the military's job to identify and track craft entering our country's territory using state of the art technology. If they can't explain what they're seeing and tracking that is more than a little odd.

    2 weeks later
    #2007 2 years ago
    Quoted from DCP:

    .... a lot of people didn't realize that an earlier report with the EXACT SAME VIDEOS was released in 2018, and other versions came out in 2019.
    https://www.navytimes.com/news/your-navy/2018/03/13/video-shows-apparent-encounter-between-navy-pilot-and-ufo/
    It wasn't a new report. It was just time to distract the public again. They'll bring it out again in a few years if they need the distraction. The "tic-tac" is dramatic-looking, so it makes good TV and rumor-starting material.
    My opinion re: "tic-tac": it's an internal reflection of some sort in the aircraft's camera systems. It rotates in perfect sync with the aircraft that's watching it, therefore it is actually PART of that aircraft being picked up by sensors and improperly displayed. Glitches like that happen a lot in high-sensitivity sensor systems. It looks cool, so they show it to us over and over again.

    This is just so wrong on SO many points. First, yes, the videos of the tic-tac incident leaked earlier. However, we never had verification that the videos were real until the government declassified them in 2019! At the same time we heard much more to the story and just how it was David Fravor came to be sent to investigate. Additionally, to suggest it was some "glitch" is hilarious. You have multiple (plural) different systems and kinds of systems that all detected the 'objects' which is why Fravor was sent to investigate. You literally have multiple eye witnesses who saw the objects with their own eyes moving in ways they could not explain. The only plausible explanation (for you) is that they are all lying and it's one big conspiracy.

    The government has thousands of far more plausible (and far easier to manufacture) excuses to distract you.

    We've said it a million times but apparently it needs repeating. We are in a process of revelation. It's not all going to be revealed overnight. You're getting it in pieces to soften the inevitable psychological impact to society.

    #2009 2 years ago
    Quoted from DCP:

    LOL. We will be anxiously awaiting this so-called "process of revelation."

    News flash, you're already well into the process. You literally had our military tell you these things are real and remain unexplained. You literally had former President Obama tell you It's true, we see these things and we cannot explain them.
    More videos (clearer videos) and even stronger evidence will continue to be slowly relesed over the coming years.
    How long you want to keep your head buried in the sand and pretend the military are a bunch of morons who don't recognize a "glitch" is on you.
    Yourself.

    #2014 2 years ago
    Quoted from DCP:

    You literally had all these people tell you that they CANNOT EXPLAIN THEM. That means that our knowledge of the true origin of UFOs has not increased one tiny bit in the past 60 years.
    "....remain unexplained" and "...we cannot explain them" doesn't even suggest that UFOs are extraterrestrial, or from a foreign country, or have unknown technology, or ANYTHING! They don't say anything at all about them.
    UNIDENTIFIED == UNEXPLAINED == WE STILL DON'T KNOW ANYTHING
    Feel free to carry on with your hallucinations, JMcDonald. They can be entertaining at times. You've obviously drunk the tic-tac flavored Kool-Aid, so there's no hope for you.

    More caps. Please

    Unexplained as in "we saw these craft with our own eyes and they moved in ways that seem to defy physics as we know it". In addition, we have multiple types of sensors and radar that all corroborate movements and speeds that again, we cannot explain and seemingly defy physics. Not "we can't explain them but we're sure it was just nothing or just some glitch".

    There is no innocent explanation but I agree, there could be a variety of explanations but they're ALL life changing, forever. Craft from a different dimension? Craft from from a different time? Craft from another solar system? Are they even 'manned' craft or just probes? NO explanation is as easy as "it's a glitch". The military aren't morons and you're not listening to what they're telling you.
    HeadUpButt (resized).jpgHeadUpButt (resized).jpg

    -1
    #2018 2 years ago
    Quoted from DCP:

    And some people can see contrail shadows, satellites, weather balloons, and the moon, and be completely convinced they've seen visitors from other planets.
    It takes all kinds, I guess.

    I'm not sure what's more blatant, your hubris or your anger issues. Either way it's clear you're terrible at math and 2+2 will remain a debate for you.

    #2019 2 years ago
    Quoted from beelzeboob:

    Don't know if this has been posted, but it's also clearly nothing important.
    https://www.cnn.com/2022/01/26/world/unusual-space-object-transient-scn/index.html
    Some people could have an anal probe performed while fully awake and find their pet cow exsanguinated in the back yard the next morning and still convince themselves there's nothing going on.

    It's certainly a fascinating discovery so close to home. usually when they find odd anomalies like this they're hundreds of millions (if not billions) of light years away. I certainly won't jump to the conclusion it's intelligent life that created something unique but it still sounds interesting and I bet JWST will absolutely have this on their list of things to investigate. I cannot wait to start seeing and hearing all of the incredible discoveries JWST is about to reveal for us starting later this summer.

    #2021 2 years ago
    Quoted from DCP:

    I'm not engaging in personal attacks.

    Quoted from DCP:

    LOL. We will be anxiously awaiting this so-called "process of revelation."

    Quoted from DCP:

    Yes, beelzeboob , that is a very interesting phenomenon that's been detected. Until we find out what it really is, then it must be aliens, right?

    Libeling you? Disparaging your math abilities? OMG, c'mon, lol. I guess you don't realize when you're attacking others but repeatedly mocking people over and over again and putting 50% of your post in all caps (not to mention posting 3 times in a row?) and making your own claims that others are "making stuff up" when you reply, just might be construed as personal attacks. So cry me a river when you receive the same in return.

    FACT: The military declassified multiple videos of various types of radar both from ships and from aircraft which tracked other craft they could not identify nor explain the movements of (stating they dropped from 60,000 feet down to just above sea level in the blink of an eye).
    FACT: The military has told us the craft moved at speeds and changed direction that defied physics as we know it.
    FACT: Multiple pilots from more than one craft made clear visual confirmation of one of the craft (under perfect weather conditions per Fravor) and observed it for several minutes.
    FACT: Same pilot (Fravor) says the object was "fluttering about and roiling the ocean beneath it" and then rose and took off at a speed that was inexplicable.
    FACT: The same craft was reacquired seconds later more than 50 miles away and was again visually identified by another pilot.

    These are FACTS. Not conjecture. The government has shifted to admitting these incidents occur and countless pilots report similar experiences around the world. There are no innocent explanations left. This was not some weather balloon. This was not one man's hallucination. This was not some bird or animal hovering above the water. This was not some computer glitch. While these similar craft have been seen in the past all around the world this is the first time in history that our government has shifted policy and now admit to what they're seeing (and they are taking it very seriously).

    I never once said there is "proof of aliens". But I am absolutely saying there is very strong evidence that craft built by someone or something far more intelligent than humans are here. Our own highest levels of military say they have no reason to believe it's the Chinese or Russians and if it were, it would be the biggest leap in technology in the history of humanity combined with the largest failure in intelligence gathering ever. I'm not making that up, they said it. So if we've exhausted all natural explanations we know of then what is left? The craft are real, we've set human eyes on them directly. The speeds and change in directions are inexplicable (again, both verified with human eyes combined with multiple types of advanced radar systems). That's one point.

    A separate point I'm suggesting is yes, that government leaders are not complete morons and they would have assessed the ramifications of telling citizens "overnight" that yes, we have much higher-resolution photos, videos, evidence but we don't want to alarm the world overnight. We can't hide this secret forever so we better start leaking a bit little by little.

    https://nypost.com/2021/04/30/pentagon-whistleblower-warns-of-ufo-intelligence-failure-on-par-with-9-11/

    #2024 2 years ago
    Quoted from DanQverymuch:

    Dear Mr. McDonald, if that is your real name,
    How exactly does anyone go about a slow process of revealing something when they do not know what it is and cannot explain it?
    These two notions are mutually exclusive. So which is it? How is reiterating "we dunno what they is" at all a revelation?
    "More caps please"? Really? They can be used for emphasis, it is not the same as entire paragraphs of all caps which look like shouting. Try reading and comprehending the things being emphasized instead of being dismissive, which is not a valid element of argument. There are no posts that are anything near "50% caps" so it is a FACT (it's okay when you do it?) that you were lying about that.
    All your "life changing" guesses make the assumption that these things are crafts. Based on what evidence?
    If service members were ordered to go along with a ruse to confuse and distract the public or other nations, you don't think they would do so? It would hardly be in the running for the worst orders they are willing to blindly obey.
    Ever watch close-up card tricks? Hi def video and one still cannot figure out how they did that. Must be magic then, right?

    No, it's not my name. I'm just a huge fan of Ronald McDonald and Old McDonald's Farm.

    I'm confident the government has a much clearer understanding of what or who they are. Again, it only takes an ounce of logic to realize they can't just come out and dump all of their evidence and the truth on the world. Why now? Because the advancement of technology has quickly reached a point where they can no longer contain the truth and a slow revelation is the best chance at minimizing disaster (mass panic, world economies crashing, religious institutions falling apart, etc).

    Fravor was long since out of the Navy when he told his story along with the other pilots. He doesn't take orders and his own friends have confirmed he told them the story years before the video was declassified. These pilots were only permitted to speak on camera after the incident was declassified. You're jumping through far more hoops than I am in trying to explain why the government would want people to think this is true, none of which makes an ounce of sense. To "confuse and distract the public or other nations"? Umm, okay. You go with that. If that makes sense to you stick with that. Quite the elaborate conspiracy (over the course of 2 decades no less) to "confuse and distract". It's not like COUNTLESS other nation's military's have been reporting very similar episodes or anything. We had to spend millions on an official report, arrange for Senators to have a closed-door briefing with far more information than the report revealed, and all other parts of this fabricated ... to "confuse and distract" from something they knew was going to happen more than 15 years beforehand.

    It's absolutely amazing the lengths to which our government will go to hide ACTUAL conspiracies (oh, perhaps say, the Steele Dossier??) but when they actually come out and admit there is "something" here they cannot explain suddenly now you call it a conspiracy and a lie. Amazing.

    #2034 2 years ago
    Quoted from Monte:

    Equivocation that you believe they do exist, just as arrogant.

    How is believing the account as told by multiple eye witnesses which (again) was corroborated by multiple types of advanced radar systems from multiple ships and aircraft "arrogant"?? Both eye witnesses and advanced systems stating what they saw and recorded defies physics as we currently know it (which, if you put down humanity's arrogance for a moment, you would realize is still in its' infancy).

    Arrogance is taking all of that incredible evidence, dismissing it, and saying "I believe it was a glitch. There can't be an otherworldly explanation. I know everything that's possible". That's arrogance.

    #2036 2 years ago
    Quoted from Monte:

    Ok, you got me. How about this. UFOs they exist! UFOs they don’t exist! Get it?

    No, actually I don't. If you choose to ignore the evidence and literally what even former President Obama is telling you (UFO's are real, we just don't know what they are), that' fine. But to LuckyDogg's point ... why are you in this thread? Why is it so important for a few of you to repeatedly come in here and call us "delusional" and post condescending attacks?? Some of us have open minds and absolutely believe considering an otherworldly explanation should not be excluded given the extreme evidence (and yes, I personally believe that explanation is more likely than not at this point).

    #2048 2 years ago
    Quoted from DCP:

    No one has ever said they have evidence of anything defying physics as we know it.

    David Fravor stated this based on what he saw with his own eyes and the other female pilot in a separate 2nd jet concurred (60 Minutes interview):
    https://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/ufo-tic-tac-flying-saucer-chad-underwoord-dave-fravor-a9254671.html

    That's called "evidence" especially when corroborated with the radar data that sent them there in the first place. Proof? No. E-v-i-d-e-n-c-e. Strong evidence these craft/objects were not man-made.

    Quoted from DCP:

    Can't you see what a meaningless statement this is? Unidentified flying objects are real, but we just don't know what they are. "Unidentified" means "We don't know what they are".
    Saying UFOs are "real" means nothing if we haven't identified them. Obama's statement only says that the SIGHTINGS are real, which we already know. He never says the UFOs themselves are "real".

    Your head is so far buried in the sand I'm embarrassed for you.

    Yes, multiple people including MULTIPLE EYE WITNESSES (ie. pilots) have stated the objects maneuvered at speeds and changed direction on a dime that were impossible and inexplicable. Fravor himself said this in the 60 Minutes interview. If you want to ignore the countless eye witnesses observations and pretend the military only see computer projections (what an absolutely idiotic and false claim BTW) then great, MOVE ALONG. It's like you didn't even bother to read the Pentagon's own report. They've ruled out computer glitches. 144 credible incidents investigated and only 1 was found to be a weather balloon. Try READING the Pentagon's report. They believe the objects were REAL and remain unexplained. When you literally see an orb hovering over the ocean and then "splashing" into the ocean, that's not some computer screen "glitch".

    #2049 2 years ago
    Quoted from DCP:

    David Fravor is a fighter pilot. He is by no means an expert on the software and hardware involved in creating the displays he uses. He is an "end-user" who does not claim to understand electronics or software or the technical details of electronic countermeasures.
    He is not the "end-all" witness, by any means.

    Over and over again you make uninformed and inaccurate claims. Fravor was not looking at some monitor. He was looking directly at the object and witnessed it along with 3 other pilots (in 2 different jets) who all corroborated his account. That's a FACT. He was a Top Gun graduate and is by all accounts HIGHLY intelligent. They are trained to identify hundreds of types of craft. For these pilots to not have any idea what they were looking at is astonishing in itself.

    Quoted from DCP:

    Why do you think the US Government is the sole contact point for alien visitors? Why not some other government? Why any government at all? Why wouldn't aliens just make themselves known to all of us at once? Or to anyone they choose, not necessarily a "US Gummint Official"?
    The argument that the US Government is somehow the only entity that knows the truth about UFOs, and that they are the only ones that can trickle out information to the public when they think we're "ready", is really a pretty absurd argument.

    Even yet another uninformed and uneducated claim. COUNTLESS countries and countless other military personnel have reported very similar accounts and in many instances have described seeing similar craft. This isn't a phenomenon unique to America, good Lord. Just move along.

    -8
    #2052 2 years ago
    Quoted from DCP:

    JMcDonald, who the fuck do you think you are that you can tell me to "move along"?
    You are taking this way too far and making it way too personal. Back off and start admitting that your ideas are OPINIONS also, just like mine.
    You don't have all the answers, smart ass.
    We are all allowed to express our opinions here. I label my opinions clearly as such.
    You act like you're the only one with a valid opinion.
    Eff you, buddy.
    [quoted image]

    Just a troll. Repeated profanity and personal attacks. I state actual facts, not just opinions. This guy needs to be banned from this thread, period.

    -2
    #2054 2 years ago
    Quoted from DCP:

    It could easily be argued that you are trolling me.
    You make a lot of statements that aren't facts. You fill in words that don't exist, like saying that Obama said that UFOs are real. You make up a lot of stuff.
    No one needs to be banned from this thread. You just need to accept that I don't believe the same things that you do.

    You lob constant personal attacks. You repeatedly use profanity. You repeatedly state the SAME opinion over and over and dismiss the FACTS.

    I believe this thread was opened to freely discuss the FACT that the U.S now acknowledges the UFO's are real (not that they are alien in nature, but they are real and FREQUENT). You have posted NONSTOP dismissively that it's all ridiculous and just "computer glitches" and refused to engage in actual discussion of the facts or the intent of this thread. GET LOST. Even the OP has asked as much.

    #2067 2 years ago
    Quoted from DCP:

    There have always been attention-seeking people that will say just about anything to get noticed.

    Tell us about it.

    If you read the Pentagon report there are conclusions that are hard to ignore:
    144 credible incidents investigated in-depth and only 1 incident could be explained as weather balloon.
    The objects/craft encountered were real.
    Computer "glitches" eliminated as possibility.
    Movements and behavior difficult to explain.
    Cannot rule out being extraterrestrial in nature.

    Does it prove it's aliens? No. But there is strong evidence "something" intelligent and not man-made is here. Also, there is a reason Congress was given a closed-doors confidential briefing with additional information and evidence beyond what we were told in the report and why some of those coming out of the briefing looked shell-shocked. That happened and it wasn't to 'distract you' from something.

    #2075 2 years ago
    Quoted from DCP:

    The rest were not identified. They "remain unexplained." No aliens, no strange craft.

    No, they could not rule out aliens or an extraterrestrial source.

    Quoted from DCP:

    This is a complete lie, JMcDonald ! They definitely acknowledged "glitches" as a possibility.
    Here are quotes from last year's report:

    Sensor anomalies == glitches.

    Again, no. Yes, they clearly defined 5 categories for what these incidents 'could' fall into and yes, sensor anomalies were noted. However, 143 incidents out of 144 could NOT be put into that category. Do you really think the military did not run tests on their equipment and do you really think they just blew off these incidents of "something" invading our territorial integrity?? The military takes these matters extremely seriously. I have full confidence they looked HARD for an explanation and came up empty.

    Quoted from DCP:

    You are welcome to your opinions. I don't believe for one second that the recent report had anything new in it.
    The shell-shocked people were stupid congressmen who don't know anything. They were chosen for their newsworthy "shell-shocked" appearance.
    It fooled you completely. The US Government are highly-trained Messengers Of Deception.

    OMG, are you serious?? The fact that the government is now acknowledging these incidents at all is a FIRST. That's new!

    Now you're telling us the US government are masters of deception but you offer no explanation for why they would want to deceive us and to be aware of this. You're also telling folks here that the US government was NOT deceiving us the past CENTURY when it seemed they were hiding every instance of people reporting seeing UFO's (hundreds of cases) including military personnel. Nope, none of that was government deception. The only deception is them now telling us it's true, these inexplicable events do occur. They are truly masters of deception.

    Also, apparently every other country around the world is also deceiving their people (again, for unknown reasons) because this is not unique to the U.S., it is a global phenomenon.

    #2080 2 years ago
    Quoted from DCP:

    Actually, this is not what they said at all. They said the unexplained incidents (the other 143) would eventually fall into one of the 5 categories that they listed "...if and when individual UAP incidents are resolved..."
    They had only explained one of the 144 so far - the weather balloon. The others are awaiting disposition into one of the 5 categories.

    Show me the quote from the report where it says all 143 incidents "would eventually fall into a category". Nonsense. These particular incidents are over just the last 20 years. I have no doubt events that happened more than 10 years ago have been HEAVILY investigated and still remain unsolved and will continue to remain unsolved.

    Quoted from DCP:

    None of the 5 categories are "aliens or an extraterrestrial source" as you keep insisting.
    You have to read the report carefully to understand what they are really saying.
    You may think I'm being really picky here, but it's important to read the actual report and see what words they actually used. As soon as you start paraphrasing, you change the meaning and bend it toward what you would like to believe.

    First of all, this would be the "other" category.

    Second, feel free to Google the countless headlines "Does NOT rule out aliens". Here are a few for your READING.
    https://www.nytimes.com/2021/06/25/us/politics/pentagon-ufo-report.html
    https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-57559179
    https://www.reuters.com/business/aerospace-defense/us-report-pentagon-documented-ufos-leaves-sightings-unexplained-2021-06-25/

    Quoted from DCP:

    I'm trying to teach you a little bit about scientific objectivity, and about careful reading and interpretation.
    These skills are very useful when dealing with tricky topics such as UFOs.

    No, you're just being condescending and arrogant while dismissing significant revelations about these incidents and new developments to date.

    More fun notes in regards to the report:
    -In 18 incidents, described in 21 reports, observers reported unusual UAP movement patterns or flight characteristics.
    -Some UAP appeared to remain stationary in winds aloft, move against the wind, maneuver abruptly, or move at considerable speed, without discernable means of propulsion. In a small number of cases, military aircraft systems processed radio frequency (RF) energy associated with UAP sightings". What an odd thing from a "glitch"
    - "Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA), the chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, released a statement, saying, “Through the Intelligence Authorization Act, the Congress and the Intelligence Committee required the preparation and release of today’s report, as it has become increasingly clear that unidentified aerial phenomena are not a rare occurrence" (well, I'm glad to know these "glitches" are not rare).

    #2088 2 years ago
    Quoted from DCP:

    There is nothing about a fighter pilot's experience that makes them experts on any of the technical aspects of any of their equipment.

    So much ignorance in just one post, lol. You're obviously clueless just how much these people know about these systems.

    Quoted from DCP:

    They are highly-trained end-users, not scientists or engineers. Those are two completely different career paths - jet pilot or engineer.

    Again, ummm ... NO. You're flat-out wrong. Some pilots are in fact Engineers. Some pilots are in fact scientists. "You must have a minimum of a bachelor's degree from the Air Force Academy or a civilian college to become an Air Force pilot. Preferred degrees include aerospace engineering, computer science, chemistry and physics".

    Quoted from DCP:

    I don't know of any fighter pilots who have participated in the engineering design aspects of any of their equipment.

    Know a lot of fighter pilots do you? The arrogance of this statement is surreal. Without knowing any myself I'm going to go out on a limb and say their input in design of the systems they're expected to use is invaluable.

    Quoted from DCP:

    There is also nothing about a fighter pilot's character that makes them infallible witnesses. They are human just like us.

    Again, not just one, but four pilots that day (on initial contact) witnessed the "tic-tac" with their own eyes. All four confirmed what they saw from 2 different jets and they observed the object for several minutes before it left in the blink of an eye. Ideal conditions that day ... blue skies and the ocean was as calm as it could be. They saw smooth surfaces and no visible signs of propulsion or even wings. A fifth fighter pilot (Chad Underwood) reacquired the object a moment later (50 miles away) and filmed it.
    Proof? NO (again). STRONG evidence of "something" incredible going on.
    https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2019/12/tic-tac-ufo-video-q-and-a-with-navy-pilot-chad-underwood.html

    Your explanation? So far we've heard the government are "masters of deception", "glitches", and "humans aren't infallible".

    Quoted from DCP:

    Think about it - it was a 5-minute incident (according to him) that happened over 15 years ago. He's been telling the same story over and over for that entire time, with no significant changes or additions.
    The other pilot who saw the tic-tac says that the whole incident lasted 10 seconds. Fravor's memory isn't perfect. No human has a perfect memory. And he obviously has a huge investment in believing that what he saw was an alien craft or some kind of advanced technology.
    Don't let the government fool you into thinking that fighter pilots are some sort of superhuman brainiacs that have all the answers about UFOs. They're not that at all. They are people who saw something they couldn't identify, like countless others.
    Their explanations and theories about what the tic-tac "might" be are from their own imaginations, and don't constitute proof of any kind.
    Trust me, we will all know the real proof when we see it.

    David fravor has never attempted to "explain" what he saw much less ever call it "alien". The Navy fully debriefed him (and the other pilots) immediately following the incident and I'm confident there exists a confidential report of the incident with in-depth detail while their memories were fresh. You act like he was just one person on a walk on a beach and spotted something out of the corner of his eye for a split-second. These pilots were sent specifically to this location to investigate "something" on the ship's multiple radar systems that showed "something" in our airspace. They are eye witnesses that this was not some radar (multiple radars apparently) "glitch". They are highly-trained observers at identifying craft.

    Do some more reading on the incident and the various accounts instead of making some of the most ridiculous claims that you're making. You have NO plausible explanation.

    #2096 2 years ago
    Quoted from Fytr:

    ...more like aliens aren't real and JMcDonald wont STOP talking about it.

    I'm sorry, am I in the wrong thread? Or are you?

    -1
    #2105 2 years ago

    Ahh yes, Gordon Cooper. Just one of those guys who will say anything for attention and takes orders from the government, the masters of deception. He's certainly not credible. #sarcasm

    #2106 2 years ago

    Yes, this video and incident from Turkey (hey, you mean it's not just in the United States??) is fascinating.

    #2111 2 years ago
    Quoted from Azmodeus:

    Interesting conversation regarding perception and u f o sightings in here.

    Any idea when that part of the discussion begins? It's a pretty lengthy video but I'd be interested in listening to the comments you're referring to.

    #2129 2 years ago
    Quoted from RonSS:

    I agree on the summary part. For the gods' sake, let me know what I'm about to watch!

    Are you really too lazy to watch the first few seconds of the video where they tell you what you're about to watch or even read the YouTube Descriptions of the videos?? If that's too much effort for you than I'm guessing you really don't have an interest in this topic beyond attacking those who are.

    #2134 2 years ago

    Fascinating discovery and something the Theory Of Relativity says should not be possible. I guess we don't know everything there is to know after all (ie. FTL travel may well be possible).

    https://www.thespaceacademy.org/2020/11/scientists-accelerate-backward-time.html?m=1&fbclid=IwAR3Jw4LhUZSakyRf7fEd402SGbCOSBsXtgvc3eqTSZorT2xxC5jULxNOHSA

    #2139 2 years ago
    Quoted from Goronic:

    Looks like a 'tic tac' to me... This slow release and confirmation of UAP's from several government militaries, including the United States, moves us closer to a public understanding that alien crafts have been, and are, here. But I think the position will be that they don't pose a threat to humanity or they likely would have acted by now???

    Agreed. I think they've been visiting this planet for millenia and know they are so far more advanced (to this day) that we pose no threat to them. With the vastness of space I'm confident they've figured out there is no shortage of resources. There is no reason to destroy us. There is no reason to even jump out of their craft and say hello! They likely already know more about us than we do.

    #2140 2 years ago

    This is more fascinating new research that suggests we may not know the true limit of the speed of light. Remember, Einstein only said there is nothing faster than light "in a vacuum". However, what if light itself was capable of traveling much faster in "something" other than a vacuum? I'm confident there is so much we don't know and bridging the vast distances of our galaxy can be overcome (which is why I believe we're being visited.)

    https://www.thespaceacademy.org/2021/02/astrophysicists-gamma-ray-jets-exceed.html?fbclid=IwAR0t6cymI857SSH8A3cZCl7-oE4KU0zy-pfoZGhyDd1t3sSdRYH06K1CYog

    #2142 2 years ago
    Quoted from DanQverymuch:

    Yawn... this "fascinating discovery" is five years old. (April 2017) The "video" is just talk with a static backdrop.
    More faulty logic on your part: we don't know everything, therefore anything is possible.

    Umm, 5 years is not "old". Are you suggesting we should already be seeing massive societal changes and visiting other solar systems from the discovery? That's ridiculous and not how science and the real world works.

    Quoted from DanQverymuch:

    This 2.5 year-old (Sep 2019) "new" research "suggests" no such thing. Did you even read it, or just parse it for buzzwords? I'm pretty sure the aliens are not jets of superluminal gamma rays in a gaseous medium shooting out of blazars. Again with the same logical fallacy. If you are so confident in a fantasy, I fear the only "visitation" in your future will be by some dudes in white coats.

    Again, 2.5 years is not "old". That's very recent. Knowing that we know so little of all that there is to know is also not bad logic to realize the possibilities are unimaginable. If the possibilities WERE imaginable we'd already be doing it. ALL I was highlighting is that new discoveries are happening every day and (OH OH, MY OPINION) I believe we'll absolutely travel faster than light in a vacuum one day.

    One discovery leads to another.

    #2144 2 years ago
    Quoted from DanQverymuch:

    What I object to is your breathlessly heralding obscure years-old anomalies as though they are fresh a

    Unsupported opinions are the exact opposite of science.
    I'm just trying to keep it 100, while you try to keep it the square root of -1.

    "heralding obscure years-old anomalies"?? Again, it's just 5 years old. I wasn't aware scientists had demonstrated negative mass in a laboratory (in fact, I had not really even heard of the concept of negative mass.) I simply thought it was relevant and that others might find it interesting as well. Apparently you're aware of every single experiment conducted and every research paper ever written. But you don't need to crap on my every post.

    And supporting my opinion is EXACTLY what I've been doing by pointing out there are fascinating new discoveries in physics nearly every day which may lead to other new discoveries that allow us to discover FTL. Highlighting some of these discoveries SUPPORTS my opinion (albeit sure, it does not PROVE my opinion).

    #2153 2 years ago

    This one from Columbia is new to me and looks like a very impressive video. Of course, we can't quite make out an alien waving from a window so it's probably just come advanced Columbian military craft. #sarcasm

    1 week later
    #2162 2 years ago

    Significant increase in UFO reportings in Ukraine since start of war.

    2 weeks later
    #2182 2 years ago

    Little by little more more details are coming out. All part of the process of revelation. I wonder why so much needs to be redacted?

    https://www.foxnews.com/politics/redacted-classified-us-ufo-report

    1 month later
    #2231 1 year ago
    Quoted from Pinstein:

    I got a feeling today will be a big nothing burger, but I hope Im wrong. Will Cspan cover the whole hearing?

    Well of course they're not going to come out and say or show anything Earth shattering. However, the conversation is already very interesting and they continue to drop more and more information. Again, it's a process of revelation and that is happening slowly and today is just one more step forward.

    4 weeks later

    You're currently viewing posts by Pinsider jmcdonald.
    Click here to go back to viewing the entire thread.

    Reply

    Wanna join the discussion? Please sign in to reply to this topic.

    Hey there! Welcome to Pinside!

    Donate to Pinside

    Great to see you're enjoying Pinside! Did you know Pinside is able to run without any 3rd-party banners or ads, thanks to the support from our visitors? Please consider a donation to Pinside and get anext to your username to show for it! Or better yet, subscribe to Pinside+!


    This page was printed from https://pinside.com/pinball/forum/topic/so-ufo-s-are-real-now-?tu=jmcdonald and we tried optimising it for printing. Some page elements may have been deliberately hidden.

    Scan the QR code on the left to jump to the URL this document was printed from.