(Topic ID: 253478)

Reducing Arcing on Early SS Pin Flipper EOS and Cabinet Switches

By Pecos

4 years ago


Topic Heartbeat

Topic Stats

  • 23 posts
  • 7 Pinsiders participating
  • Latest reply 4 years ago by Escapism
  • Topic is favorited by 14 Pinsiders

You

Linked Games

Topic Gallery

View topic image gallery

DSCF3724 (resized).JPG
DSCF3723 (resized).JPG
Arcing Reducers (resized).png
EOS_switch_capacitor2 (resized).jpg
EOS_switch_capacitor.jpg
EOS_Capacitors.jpg
flipper_eos_contact_missing (resized).jpg
flipper_eos_contact_close_up (resized).jpg
#1 4 years ago

I need to replace the flipper EOS switch on my left flipper of #mr-and-mrs-pac-man. As you can see, these contacts are fried. One of them was so damaged from arcing that it fell off! I want the contacts on the new switches I buy to last longer than these did. And I want to do it for all of my early SS pins. The question is, how can I reduce the arcing that damages the contacts, reduces the power to the flipper solenoids and causes weaker flipper performance?

flipper_eos_contact_missing (resized).jpgflipper_eos_contact_missing (resized).jpg

flipper_eos_contact_close_up (resized).jpgflipper_eos_contact_close_up (resized).jpg

In the picture above it appears like the metal from the lower contact was deposited onto the upper contact.

I have done some research about adding a capacitor to flipper EOS and cabinet switches. I have read that it only matters on later 80s games and newer that use parallel and not series solenoids. I have read that 2.2 uF capacitors on the EOS switches and .1 uF capacitors on the cabinet flipper switches will help. I have read that capacitors will not help at all on early SS pins. I don't know what to believe.

Bay Area Amusements has these "225K 50V Axial Capacitor - Early Williams EOS Switch Cap[s]"

http://bayareaamusements.com/Merchant2/merchant.mvc?Screen=PROD&Product_Code=CA-225

I don't think I have ever seen capacitors on early Williams pins and I haven't read anything about 225K uF capacitors used for flipper EOS switches.

I know I can upgrade the solenoids/flipper assemblies, but I have too many pins to do that. I don't need to eliminate the arcing entirely. I just want to reduce the amount wear on the contacts and reduce the amount of time that I have to polish these contacts with a Dremel and #443 wire brushes.

So, what is the real story here? Is there a way I can reduce the arcing? I want the pins I have on route to have powerful flippers and I don't want to have to spend a lot of money to do it.

#2 4 years ago

Bally flipper coils are parallel wound, just like the later Williams flipper coils. I unspooled one of them to verify this - there are 2 separate coil windings in the coil, with the hold coil first, then the primary coil closest to the bobbin. So any benefit to the flipper cap WMS uses will benefit the Bally cap as well.

#3 4 years ago

Capacitors across the EOS switches on these old solid state machines does improve the situation. I installed some 0.22uF 630V caps across the EOS switches on my old SS Bally a year ago and the arcing does not happen 2/3 of the time.

Notes:
50V capacitors are not sufficient for this application - they need to be rated in the hundreds of volts.
The capacitors need to be cable tied to the flipper frame, otherwise vibration from the flipper will cause the cap leads to break off at the solder joints.

If you look at the Bally schematics of this era, they list that Germany has 0.01uf 500volt capacitors across the EOS switches, though I believe this was done more for EMI reasons rather than wanting to prolong the life of the EOS switch though one goes in hand with the other.

EOS_Capacitors.jpgEOS_Capacitors.jpg

#4 4 years ago

I thought the caps on williams were because they were 50V and not 25V, and the higher voltage increased arcing to the point where the caps were needed... Where did you see the parallel stuff?

I can confirm though, that even on a gottlieb (25V, presumably series wound?) that adding caps to the EOS does reduce arcing and EMI

#5 4 years ago

I did some research for non-pinball solutions and found that there is something called a 'snubber' circuit that reduces the arcing.

But first I want to understand what, exactly, is causing the arcing. Okay guys, please work with me here. I am not an electronics expert so I could have some of the following wrong. Please correct any mistakes I make.

Electricity flows into the coils (wires) of the high power flipper solenoid when the cabinet flipper button is pressed and when the EOS switch is closed. This creates a strong electro-magnetic field. The high power solenoid is deactivated when the flipper button is released or when the flipper button continues to be pushed and the flipper moves to the 'up' position, opening up the EOS switch. Current then flows to the low power solenoid (hold solenoid) when the EOS switch is opened. This is better explained here:

http://stevekulpa.net/pinball/bally_flipper1.htm

As I understand it, and, as I mentioned above, I may not understand it, this is how the arcing is created. The 43 to 48 Volts DC causes some arcing as the EOS switch opens. More arcing occurs when the current to the solenoid is turned off and the EOS switch closes. The electro-magnetic field collapses and that creates an electrical current with high voltages - much higher than the 43 to 48 Volts DC used to power the flipper solenoids causing arcing. This is why solenoids on solid state pinball machines have diodes. They prevent the solenoid voltage and the high 'kickback' voltage from reaching the sensitive transistors on the driver board that control the solenoids.

An RC 'snubbing' circuit can be added that will reduce the arcing. The circuit is simple with a capacitor in parallel to the EOS switch and a resistor in series with the capacitor, thus the name 'RC', not to be confused with model RC cars or planes. In layman's terms, that's me, the capacitor goes across the EOS switches and the resistor goes 'inline' next to the capacitor.

This page shows the circuit and some guidelines for determining the values of the resistor and capacitor:

https://www.idec.com/language/english/AppNotes/Relays/contact_circuit_protection.pdf

Resistor Value = .5 to 1 Ohm per Volt
Capacitor Value = .5 to 1 uF per Amp

Bally pins use 43VDC and Williams pins use 25VDC and, later, 50VDC. So, the resistor value should be 22 to 43 Ohms for Bally and 13 to 25 Ohms for Williams @25VDC and 25 to 50 Ohms for Williams @50VDC. I am unsure of the Wattage.

Flipper solenoids draw approximately 4.3A per Steve Kulpa (http://stevekulpa.net/pinball/bally_flipper1.htm). So the capacitor value should be 2.2 to 4.3 uF.

As Quench mentioned:

Quoted from Quench:50V capacitors are not sufficient for this application - they need to be rated in the hundreds of volts.

Has anyone tried an RC 'snubber' circuit to reduce arcing? Results?

#6 4 years ago
Quoted from Pecos:

Has anyone tried an RC 'snubber' circuit to reduce arcing? Results?

I did this in a homebrew because the arcing was causing EMI and resetting my mpu. Put it on the eos and cab switches, fixed the issue. Not sure why the Williams don't have a resistor though?

#7 4 years ago
Quoted from zacaj:

I thought the caps on williams were because they were 50V and not 25V, and the higher voltage increased arcing to the point where the caps were needed... Where did you see the parallel stuff?
I can confirm though, that even on a gottlieb (25V, presumably series wound?) that adding caps to the EOS does reduce arcing and EMI

Well, Bally/Stern coils are 43 volts so not that much less than Williams.

The parallel winding on Bally coils I unwound one myself. They are 2 separate coils on the same bobbin, hence why they also have 4 wires to 3 terminals, and 2 diodes. Just like Williams later patented (great that people can patent preexisting tech). The info about parallel vs. series was from Clay's old guides/videos - he made one where he put the caps on the series wound and said it didn't decrease arcing, but in the video you can plainly see that it did.

I don't have a large problem with the pitting so I don't really worry about it on games that originally didn't have them.

#8 4 years ago
Quoted from slochar:

Well, Bally/Stern coils are 43 volts so not that much less than Williams.
The parallel winding on Bally coils I unwound one myself. They are 2 separate coils on the same bobbin, hence why they also have 4 wires to 3 terminals, and 2 diodes. Just like Williams later patented (great that people can patent preexisting tech). The info about parallel vs. series was from Clay's old guides/videos - he made one where he put the caps on the series wound and said it didn't decrease arcing, but in the video you can plainly see that it did.
I don't have a large problem with the pitting so I don't really worry about it on games that originally didn't have them.

So it seems that it helps even on series wound 25v?

#9 4 years ago
Quoted from zacaj:

So it seems that it helps even on series wound 25v?

Apparently. I guess in an arcade or heavy play situation it might be good to have.

I guess the theory is that a back EMF spark is a back EMF spark it doesn't really matter what kind of coil it comes from either will wear away the EOS contact.

#10 4 years ago
Quoted from Pecos:

More arcing occurs when the current to the solenoid is turned off and the EOS switch closes.

Not really, when the EOS switch is closing, the flipper circuit is already open circuit because you've released the flipper button so there is no return current path. The flipper button switch itself may arc though when opening.

Quoted from Pecos:

Has anyone tried an RC 'snubber' circuit to reduce arcing? Results?

RC snubber circuit is useful when the contacts are arcing as they close.
However optimal reduction of arcing when switches are opening (as in the case of EOS switches) is better served with a capacitor alone. See your pdf:
EOS_switch_capacitor.jpgEOS_switch_capacitor.jpg

Bit more of an explanation of RC snubbing here:
https://www.te.com/commerce/DocumentDelivery/DDEController?Action=srchrtrv&DocNm=13C3236_AppNote&DocType=CS&DocLang=EN

Extract of the section:
EOS_switch_capacitor2 (resized).jpgEOS_switch_capacitor2 (resized).jpg

#11 4 years ago

Several years ago, I put the 2.2 uf @ 250 capacitors on the end of stroke switches on an 8 Ball Deluxe as well as some .1 uf @ 500 volts ceramic disc capacitors on the cabinet flipper button switches. Made a big difference in the sparking for sure. Almost no sparking at all.

#12 4 years ago

I was trying to figure out the wattage needed for a resistor in the RC circuit and came up with this:

P = I x V
P = 4.3A x 25V
P (Watts) = 107.5

107.5 Watts? That can’t be right, can it?

Quoted from KenLayton:

Several years ago, I put the 2.2 uf @ 250 capacitors on the end of stroke switches on an 8 Ball Deluxe as well as some .1 uf @ 500 volts ceramic disc capacitors on the cabinet flipper button switches. Made a big difference in the sparking for sure. Almost no sparking at all.

Thanks Ken. That’s what I am going with.

#13 4 years ago

The full power of the flipper wouldn't be going through the resistor, so the 4.3A isn't applicable. Also it won't be 25V, since as discussed the arc is higher voltage (or at least you need a higher rated cap to handle it)

#14 4 years ago

Thanks guys for the good info!

I have ordered the following from GPE for the grand experiment:

Caps For Flipper EOS Switch:

Part Number CPA-2.2uF-250V Capacitor, Axial Polyester. These are the yellow caps, equivalent to the ones that Williams used.
Part Number CPR-2.2uF-250V-J Capacitor, Radial Polyester, 2.2uF, 250V, 5% Metalized Polyester Film. These are smaller and probably lighter.

Cap for Cabinet Flipper Switch:

Part Number CCD-0.1uF-500V-P5 Capacitor, Ceramic Disc, 0.1uF, 500V

Resistors For Both Flipper EOS Switch and Cabinet Switch:

Part Number RN70D33R2F, Resistor Metal Glaze, 33.2 Ohm, 3/4 Watt 1% These are really 2 Watt resistors downgraded to 3/4 Watt for Mil-Spec purposes.
Part Number RC5W-27-SQT Resistor, 27 Ohm, 5 Watt, SQT, in case 2 Watts isn't enough and parts begin to fry.

Both resistors are supposed to be flame resistant so I don't expect to be starting any fires. But there could be some smoke! Can you tell that I like to experiment?

I plan to somehow attach the caps to the EOS switch with zip ties, silicone or ???

I will be reporting back how well these parts reduce arcing in several different configurations.

#15 4 years ago
Quoted from Pecos:

I plan to somehow attach the caps to the EOS switch with zip ties, silicone or ???

Most people solder them on

The EOS bracket was originally taller to accommodate zip tying the cap to it, with a couple holes drilled in it to hold the zip tie. As noted, no resistors were used so it will be interesting to see what comes of your experiment with them.

#16 4 years ago
Quoted from slochar:

Most people solder them on

Oh, that’s bad, really bad. I like it!

#17 4 years ago

Look at a Flash schematic.It shows the values you need.

3 weeks later
#18 4 years ago
Quoted from Pecos:

Thanks guys for the good info!
I will be reporting back how well these parts reduce arcing in several different configurations.

Any luck with those resistors?

#19 4 years ago

Thanks for asking. I haven't gotten to it yet.

I got the parts from GPE:

Arcing Reducers (resized).pngArcing Reducers (resized).png

Caps For Flipper EOS Switch:

Part Number CPA-2.2uF-250V Capacitor, Axial Polyester. These are the yellow caps, equivalent to the ones that Williams used.
Part Number CPR-2.2uF-250V-J Capacitor, Radial Polyester, 2.2uF, 250V, 5% Metalized Polyester Film. These are smaller and probably lighter.

Cap for Cabinet Flipper Switch:

Part Number CCD-0.1uF-500V-P5 Capacitor, Ceramic Disc, 0.1uF, 500V

Resistors For Both Flipper EOS Switch and Cabinet Switch:

Part Number RN70D33R2F, Resistor Metal Glaze, 33.2 Ohm, 3/4 Watt 1% These are really 2 Watt resistors downgraded to 3/4 Watt for Mil-Spec purposes.
Part Number RC5W-27-SQT Resistor, 27 Ohm, 5 Watt, SQT, in case 2 Watts isn't enough and parts begin to fry.

I will try to get to the experimenting soon.

#20 4 years ago

If you are experimenting, use some alligator clip leads to connect everything. Saves a lot of time and effort soldering/unsoldering. Once you are happy with what works, then you can solder everything.

#21 4 years ago
Quoted from KenLayton:

If you are experimenting, use some alligator clip leads to connect everything. Saves a lot of time and effort soldering/unsoldering. Once you are happy with what works, then you can solder everything.

I wouldn't trust the clips not to arc themselves...

#22 4 years ago
Quoted from KenLayton:

If you are experimenting, use some alligator clip leads to connect everything. Saves a lot of time and effort soldering/unsoldering. Once you are happy with what works, then you can solder everything.

Good idea, but you are too late Ken. Experiment completed!

All tests were done using a Williams 1980 Black Knight.

Experiment 1: Part Number CPA-2.2uF-250V Capacitor, Axial Polyester, only.

There was a big, huge suppression of any arcing. There would occasionally be some visible arcing, less than without the capacitor, but most of the time there was little or no spark.

DSCF3723 (resized).JPGDSCF3723 (resized).JPG

Experiment 2: Part Number CPA-2.2uF-250V Capacitor, Axial Polyester, only AND Part Number RN70D33R2F, Resistor Metal Glaze, 33.2 Ohm, 3/4 Watt 1% These are really 2 Watt resistors downgraded to 3/4 Watt for Mil-Spec purposes.

The arcing was much worse with the resistor and capacitor than with the capacitor only! It shouldn't be according to what I read about RC snubbing circuits, but that is what I saw and I'm sticking to it!

DSCF3724 (resized).JPGDSCF3724 (resized).JPG

Quoted from zacaj:

The full power of the flipper wouldn't be going through the resistor, so the 4.3A isn't applicable. Also it won't be 25V, since as discussed the arc is higher voltage (or at least you need a higher rated cap to handle it)

During the second experiment the resistor didn't even get warm, even with constant flipping.

Quoted from Pecos:

More arcing occurs when the current to the solenoid is turned off and the EOS switch closes.

Quoted from Quench:

Not really, when the EOS switch is closing, the flipper circuit is already open circuit because you've released the flipper button so there is no return current path.

I never really paid attention to this, but you are absolutely right @quench. Thanks for the correction.

So, I will be putting the capacitors on all of my SS flipper EOS switches.

I just realized that I didn't test the flipper cabinet switches with the ceramic capacitors. Maybe I will do that experiment later.

#23 4 years ago

The arcing was much worse with the resistor and capacitor than with the capacitor only! It shouldn't be according to what I read about RC snubbing circuits, but that is what I saw and I'm sticking to it!

Thanks a stack.

Promoted items from Pinside Marketplace and Pinside Shops!
$ 90.00
$ 30.00
Lighting - Led
Pinballrom
 
$ 22.95
Eproms
Pinballrom
 
$ 18.00
Electronics
Yorktown Arcade Supply
 
$ 55.00
Displays
PinballSolutions.eu
 
From: $ 14.00
Electronics
Third Coast Pinball
 
$ 10.00
$ 18.95
Eproms
Pinballrom
 
Hey modders!
Your shop name here

Reply

Wanna join the discussion? Please sign in to reply to this topic.

Hey there! Welcome to Pinside!

Donate to Pinside

Great to see you're enjoying Pinside! Did you know Pinside is able to run without any 3rd-party banners or ads, thanks to the support from our visitors? Please consider a donation to Pinside and get anext to your username to show for it! Or better yet, subscribe to Pinside+!


This page was printed from https://pinside.com/pinball/forum/topic/reducing-arcing-on-early-ss-pin-flipper-eos-and-cabinet-switches?hl=mjalexan and we tried optimising it for printing. Some page elements may have been deliberately hidden.

Scan the QR code on the left to jump to the URL this document was printed from.