(Topic ID: 251086)

Re-Game: 1985 Tag Team Pinball

By cobra18t

4 years ago


Topic Heartbeat

Topic Stats

  • 162 posts
  • 20 Pinsiders participating
  • Latest reply 1 year ago by cobra18t
  • Topic is favorited by 33 Pinsiders

You

Linked Games

Topic Gallery

View topic image gallery

IMG_20230113_173600771 (resized).jpg
IMG_20221126_132138096 (resized).jpg
IMG_20221029_122028561 (resized).jpg
IMG_20221030_212037695 (resized).jpg
IMG_20221102_010129802 (resized).jpg
IMG_20221029_122019810 (resized).jpg
IMG_20220912_232031060 (resized).jpg
IMG_20220911_200837208 (resized).jpg
IMG_20220912_232122505 (resized).jpg
IMG_20210926_142119297 (resized).jpg
IMG_20210926_141949144 (resized).jpg
IMG_20210925_234649361 (resized).jpg
IMG_20210925_234712894 (resized).jpg
IMG_20210925_234458236 (resized).jpg
IMG_20210925_233112422 (resized).jpg
IMG_20210925_232832458 (resized).jpg
There are 162 posts in this topic. You are on page 1 of 4.
#1 4 years ago

I have a few ideas for original pinball games, but decided it would be better to work my way into that instead of leaping headlong into the abyss. To that end, I bought a beat up Tag-Team Pinball playfield. It was mostly populated although a few things had been scavenged. This will be my test bed for learning to make a new game. Here is the plan:

1. Strip out all lighting. I plan on using addressable RGB LEDs, so the old GI and matrix has to go.
2. Rewire solenoids and associated direct switches to be controlled by a custom driver.
3. Make a custom controller/driver board based on OPP by @openpinballproj.
4. Mount the playfield in a temporary cabinet.
5. Clean and repair the playfield and its parts to get it back to playable condition.
6. Create a new game using the Mission Pinball Framework from @jabdoa. I am not trying to directly copy the original gameplay, but will use it for design cues.
7. Build a coffee table cabinet and mount a display in the instruction card spot since there will be no head.
8. Get this all done to show at the Golden State Pinball Festival in May. GoldenStatePin

Stick to the plan, chums.

IMG_20190714_221512451_HDR (resized).jpgIMG_20190714_221512451_HDR (resized).jpg
#2 4 years ago

I got all the lighting stripped out.

I did some switch matrix tests using OPP and MPF and everything seemed to work although the switches seemed inverted (active low). Strange, but I just changed the MPF config so that the result was correct.

I also got some initial testing of solenoids using my hacked together power board. It has 24V and 5V supplies as well as a power filter capacitor board from OPP/Mezel Mods.

IMG_20190803_171925072 (resized).jpgIMG_20190803_171925072 (resized).jpgIMG_20190811_222329523 (resized).jpgIMG_20190811_222329523 (resized).jpgIMG_20190807_225623741 (resized).jpgIMG_20190807_225623741 (resized).jpg
#3 4 years ago

I’m following this one! I wish I had a better understanding of electronics so I could attempt something like this myself. Can’t wait to see the final result!

#4 4 years ago
Quoted from cobra18t:

It has 24V and 5V supplies as well as a power filter capacitor board from OPP/Mezel Mods.[quoted image][quoted image][quoted image]

Dumb question- I'm working through something similar now. Did you gang together the grounds, and if so are you having any voltage bleeding? I'd love some more pics of this setup.

#5 4 years ago
Quoted from drsfmd:

Dumb question- I'm working through something similar now. Did you gang together the grounds, and if so are you having any voltage bleeding? I'd love some more pics of this setup.

Always connect your grounds. Everything else can be very dangerous (unless you know exactly what you are doing). I recommend: http://docs.missionpinball.org/en/dev/hardware/voltages_and_power/voltages_and_power.html and http://docs.missionpinball.org/en/dev/hardware/voltages_and_power/wiring_and_connectors.html. For legal stuff about grounding: http://docs.missionpinball.org/en/dev/hardware/voltages_and_power/ground_and_appliance_classes.html

#6 4 years ago
Quoted from jabdoa:

Always connect your grounds.

Of course. That's not what I mean. I'm asking if 2 DC circuits, put together with separate power supplies like OP has done, each need their own DC ground, or if they can share a common ground. In other words, +6v out to one circuit, + 18V (in the project I'm working on) out to the other. Can the - side of those circuits be ganged together? Way off OPs topic, but I'm working on an early electromechanical with a failed transformer. I've got the idea to use two separate power supplies. The challenge is that in the original configuration, there's a single DC - supporting both.

#7 4 years ago

@drsfmd, Yes, I connect the returns ("-" terminal) of the power supplies together at the supplies. The articles that jabdoa linked are great references.

#8 4 years ago

I got the boards in today. This was my first time ordering from JLCPCB. They are 2-layer boards and they took about a week from order to receipt with DHL shipping from China to California. I might have got them sooner if I had stuck with green soldermask. They claim 24 hour fab time with green and 3-4 days with any other color. But I wanted red...because I wanted red.

I got the minimum order of 5. They are 7.75 x 4.25 inches.

They look quite good. Via drill hits are spot on and soldermask alignment is barely short of perfect. The soldermask is clean even on nearly tented vias. The silkscreen is clear with no smears or spatters. I have been spoiled by ENIG and ENEPIG plating in the past, but the HASL on this looks very good. The only place where the solder plating is not level was a spot on each of the corner mounting holes. I can live with that.

The third picture shows the tiny surface mount FET portion of the solderpaste stencil that I lasercut cut today. The FETs are only about 3mm square. The stencil is made from a clear polyester sheet so it it kind of hard to see. I had to use the Digikey ruler to have something for my phone camera to focus on. Sprechen of Digikey, I also got my parts order today. Maybe tomorrow I can solder a board if I have time.

IMG_20190909_165441655 (resized).jpgIMG_20190909_165441655 (resized).jpgIMG_20190909_165722573 (resized).jpgIMG_20190909_165722573 (resized).jpgIMG_20190909_121751606 (resized).jpgIMG_20190909_121751606 (resized).jpg
#9 4 years ago

In terms of OPP functionality, this board is roughly equivalent to:

- 6x solenoid wings
- 2x switch wings
- power filter board
- 2x interface wings

Or to put it more absolutely:
- Power filtering/switching
- 24 solenoid outputs (trying some new surface mount FETs)
- Up to 48 direct switches (can also use an 8x8 switch matrix)
- Raspberry Pi hosting option
- I2C and servo output via Pi
- holds two processor boards
- OPP chain ports for expansion
- 4.25 x 7.75"
- Power connectors: 0.156"
- Switch connectors: 0.1"

Is this board ready for sale?
NO! It is a prototype. Let me do some testing and iteration. Besides, OPP is in the process of moving to a new processor: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/mpf-users/QVQsO6JjID8

#10 4 years ago

I soldered a board today. I got a little lazy and only soldered the connectors I need for this game. I can always add them later.

There was some interest in knowing more about how I soldered the surface mount parts, so I added some pictures for that too.

1. I line up the stencil I made and tape it in place along one edge.
2. I lay down a bead of solderpaste on one end of the surface mount area.
3. Using a razor blade or putty knife, I squeegee the paste over the stencil and confirm that all apertures were evenly filled with paste.
4. Using tweezers or a vacuum pick up tool, I place all 110 surface mount parts. Then I set it on a hot plate and wait for the parts to reflow.
5. Clean off the flux and inspect the joints because surface mount soldering is done!

IMG_20190910_221726005 (resized).jpgIMG_20190910_221726005 (resized).jpgIMG_20190910_121557286 (resized).jpgIMG_20190910_121557286 (resized).jpgIMG_20190910_121937765 (resized).jpgIMG_20190910_121937765 (resized).jpgIMG_20190910_122101530 (resized).jpgIMG_20190910_122101530 (resized).jpgIMG_20190910_131733247 (resized).jpgIMG_20190910_131733247 (resized).jpgIMG_20190910_134833097 (resized).jpgIMG_20190910_134833097 (resized).jpg
#11 4 years ago

When populating the surface mount portion of the board, I remove the footprints of all the through hole parts in the stencil. Otherwise the holes can get filled up with solder which makes it more difficult to solder the through hole parts. (Through hole parts seem to always extend below the bottom of the board, so the parts can't be placed and continue to have good contact with the surface of the hot plate.)

When soldering large parts with a big pad beneath them, the squeegee method can put too much paste for that pad. I have reduced the size of the hole in the stencil to reduce the amount of paste under the part. (It does seem like the stencil layer has broken those large areas into four smaller areas. The footprints I was working with didn't do that, which may be why I needed to modify my stencil layer).

Looks great. Only added the necessary connectors is not lazy, that is cost conscious. I don't believe that you mentioned the price that you paid for the 5 boards plus shipping. Mostly I like to know, to make sure there aren't cheaper alternatives to what I currently use for fabbing the PCBs I do. (ITeadstudio does 10 boards of 10 cm x 10 cm for $20, but, here is the kicker, they will allow you to score between multiple copies of the same board on the 10 cm x 10 cm panel.)

#12 4 years ago

I make the stencil from the F.Paste layer which should not have any through hole pads on it. That is a good clarification that the hotplate was only used for surface mount parts and needs to be done *before* through hole soldering.

Yes, "windowing" of the solder paste is generally recommended for large pads. The FET footprint from Nexperia specifies these windows and the KiCad footprint already had these.

I paid $20 total ($11 for boards, $9 for shipping) for 5 boards that were 7.75 x 4.25 inches from JLCPCB.com. I am not sure what their upcharge is for scoring. Their quoting system is pretty straightforward like most Chinese fabricators I have seen, so it should be simple to get an estimate.

I powered up the 5V section of the board and connected to it via MPF. The main lesson so far is that the yellow LED and 1kohm resistor to ground on the same pin as the onboard button is enough to force the processor into bootloader mode at power up. I removed the two resistors for COIL_0-3 and COIL_1-3 to allow the processors to boot. Everything seems to be talking and reacting well to my MPF configuration.

I have some wire crimping and playfield soldering to do before I connect the 24V supplies to the board.

FET footprint (resized).pngFET footprint (resized).png
1 week later
#13 4 years ago

Rather than building a legit cabinet at this point, or using a playfield rotisserie, I decided to make a temporary box. I plan on locking the playfield in this box. Since it has no bottom, I can work on the bottom of the playfield by flipping the box over. I am not done yet, but I think it is a good use of discarded plywood.

IMG_20190919_224047379 (resized).jpgIMG_20190919_224047379 (resized).jpgIMG_20190919_224119774 (resized).jpgIMG_20190919_224119774 (resized).jpgIMG_20190919_230845597 (resized).jpgIMG_20190919_230845597 (resized).jpg
#14 4 years ago

I plan on stripping the playfield down to clean it. While I am at it, I will scan the playfield. The playfield is not in great shape, so I may retouch the scan in order to get an overlay printed.

Today I followed the instructions here to modify a scanner to mosaic scan large objects: https://mpetroff.net/2013/09/scanner-modifications-to-scan-large-documents/

I used a Canon LIDE 100. As a test, I scanned my daughter's oversized coloring book. It took 4 scans. The image I attached had to be scaled down to meet pinside posting requirements. The actual image is 600 pixels/inch and is 90 megapixels. You will have to trust me, the actual scan looks fantastic.

IMG_20190922_165053216 (resized).jpgIMG_20190922_165053216 (resized).jpgIMG_20190922_165123717 (resized).jpgIMG_20190922_165123717 (resized).jpgIMG_20190922_165140807 (resized).jpgIMG_20190922_165140807 (resized).jpgIMG_20190922_165200176 (resized).jpgIMG_20190922_165200176 (resized).jpgFindingDory01 - FindingDory04_small (resized).jpgFindingDory01 - FindingDory04_small (resized).jpg
1 week later
#15 4 years ago

Could somebody (SebKubi ?) with a Tag Team send me a quality picture of the guy lying on his back in the ring closest to the flippers? The flipper gouged out the artwork on mine.

I completed a stitched scan. It is not seemless, but it is still pretty good for blending 15 scanned images for a total pixel count of around 300MP. The one posted here is heavily reduced in resolution.

I have not verified that the holes and artwork line up with this scan yet. I need to do that since I am planning to laser cut a PETG sheet as a playfield protector to prevent further damage while I slowly work on the playfield scan touchup.

TagTeam02 (resized).jpgTagTeam02 (resized).jpgTagTeamScan (resized).jpgTagTeamScan (resized).jpg
#16 4 years ago

Almost ready to do a test cut of the PETG playfield protector...

TagTeamScan_PETGpreview (resized).jpgTagTeamScan_PETGpreview (resized).jpg
#17 4 years ago

Here you go! I hope this is high enough quality. If not, please let me know.

Also, if that overlay fits for you, please let me know. I might be interested in buying one from you to help offset your costs.

Also, if you're screen-printing new plastics, I could certainly use the mid-playfield one from the TEAM drop bank.

Let me know if you need any more pictures. I'm not equipped for large format scans, but I have a flatbed that can accomodate smaller plastics. 89A5B4D0-3B5C-4BD3-8F6E-DDD9A5E99884.jpeg89A5B4D0-3B5C-4BD3-8F6E-DDD9A5E99884.jpeg

#18 4 years ago

@semicolin, thank for the photo. That is what I needed.

I am not sure how other people do their playfield protectors. I have the protector undersized a bit so it can float around and accommodate positional variance between machines. I will keep this up to date on my protector progress.

I will likely not be screen printing anything. My plastics are in poor condition and badly warped. The center one above TEAM is the worst. I could use some scans if you could provide them. I have digitally printed vinyl decals in UV ink and then adhered those to PETG plastic in the past. I used it for both the plastics and the playfield artwork. The PETG was nice because I can laser cut it. That is what I did for this 1969 Williams Suspense.

IMG_20190517_141543286 (resized).jpgIMG_20190517_141543286 (resized).jpgIMG_20190517_141554028 (resized).jpgIMG_20190517_141554028 (resized).jpgIMG_20190517_141628082 (resized).jpgIMG_20190517_141628082 (resized).jpg
#19 4 years ago

Sure, I have all my plastics and will try to give a scan when I can. I started laser cutting with PETG earlier this year but the bed on the one I have access to isn't large enough for PF protectors.

#20 4 years ago

I cut out a test protector out of newsprint. Alignment looks pretty good all around, but I forgot an opening for the rollover switch above the upper flipper. Also, the shooter lane needs to be cut back a bit more to match the routed path in the wood.

Right now, I have a lot of clearance for every post and feature. I am concerned that the protector will have so much float that it may wander around the playfield a bit. Add a little grit to that wandering and it may start etching the protector or the artwork. To combat that, I am planning on making one post at the top of the playfield a tight fit. Another post at the bottom of the playfield will have a tight fitting slot. With those two references, it should be held in place but allow for some variance in post placement.

IMG_20191006_222805326 (resized).jpgIMG_20191006_222805326 (resized).jpg
#21 4 years ago

I fixed (hopefully) the PETG protector file.

-Added slot for rollover switch above upper left flipper.
-Extended shooter lane cut and added anti-splay tabs.
-Changed an upper post to a tight fit and a lower post in the right slingshot to a tight slot.

TagTeamScan_PETGpreview2 (resized).jpgTagTeamScan_PETGpreview2 (resized).jpg
#22 4 years ago

After another newsprint cut to verify the changes, I cut the playfield protector out of PETG. Unfortunately, I stored the PETG in a roll and it had a bad tendency to curl. I put it in between a piece of glass and plywood and put that in a 55degC oven for a few hours. After that, it was perfectly flat again. I left the matte protective film on for these photos so you can see the playfield protector better.

IMG_20191009_204307381 (resized).jpgIMG_20191009_204307381 (resized).jpgIMG_20191009_204243545 (resized).jpgIMG_20191009_204243545 (resized).jpg
#23 4 years ago

Looking good! Looking real good! I'm hoping to find some time this weekend to pull plastics and get them scanned for you.

1 week later
#24 4 years ago

I made some solid progress this past week...along with a couple mishaps.

I have reinstalled the playfield posts using #6 machine screws drilled through the playfield and nylon lock nuts. Any of the posts that were intended to support playfield plastic mounting, spinner mount, etc. I put the machine screw in from the backside. That way, the extra thread sticks out past the lock nut and I can mount things to it. Many of the post holes were stripped or very close to it, so I had to do something.

I did a lot of soldering and rewiring. I converted all autofire devices to direct logic switches rather than power switches. I installed some arcade buttons for both flipper and start buttons. There were a number of switches that had broken in half, but I go enough pieces together to finish everything.

I wanted to do a quick test with my controller board and MPF before I had everything back together. I hooked it up, flipped the power switch, and POOF...all the magic smoke was wisping up to my face. Oops. Somehow I burned out one of the PSOC boards. These are cheap, but are also discontinued and hard to find. After some sleuthing, I found that the original game had a switch matrix switch on the same switch stack as the end of stroke switch, which had 24V on it. This would not have been a big deal if I had a flipper installed. With no flipper, the flipper pawl, was pulled but its spring and shorted the two switches out. In case anyone was wondering, no, the PSOC cannot handle 24V. You can see the black pock of failure on the main IC in the image below.

I programmed another board, installed drop targets, cut out that pesky switch that shorted everything, and installed some flippers. I was a little more cautious this time during power up. I was able to run a "game" in MPF through the actual hardware. All the switches checked out and I got all solenoids firing.

For all the testing I had been bypassing a power switch on my controller. I decided to test the power switch separately. It always seemed to be on, no matter what I did. Back to the schematic. Some of you might see my mistake in the image below. I put the transistor in backward! Pins 2 and 3 should be swapped. As it stands, current can always flow through the body diode of the transistor. I do not need this capability right now so I am planning on shorting this transistor. I might dead bug a part on there for the sake of testing at some point.

This next week I hope to get this mostly reassembled and actually get a ball bouncing around to score some points!

IMG_20191018_215935205 (resized).jpgIMG_20191018_215935205 (resized).jpgIMG_20191020_165328732 (resized).jpgIMG_20191020_165328732 (resized).jpgIMG_20191020_165428195 (resized).jpgIMG_20191020_165428195 (resized).jpgCapture (resized).PNGCapture (resized).PNG
#25 4 years ago

After a little solder hacking today, I forced the surface mount power switch transistor to fit on the board with the correct pinout. It is not pretty, but power switching works now!

IMG_20191021_173343668 (resized).jpgIMG_20191021_173343668 (resized).jpgIMG_20191021_174018764 (resized).jpgIMG_20191021_174018764 (resized).jpg
#26 4 years ago

IT LIVES!

I finished a new power/electronics panel and added a coil show to the attract mode of my MPF game. It just cycles through all 15 coils so I can adjust the length of the coil pulses to change coil power.

IMG_20191021_222125137 (resized).jpgIMG_20191021_222125137 (resized).jpgIMG_20191022_230544728 (resized).jpgIMG_20191022_230544728 (resized).jpg
#27 4 years ago

After getting some solenoids to fire, it was time to stress the power system and driver board a little to see how they would fare. I modified my attract mode coil show to cycle through all solenoids every second. Also, the flippers are fired simultaneously at 3 Hz. I thought this was a pretty mean test that would reveal potential issues. It was LOUD. The video does not do the sound justice.


The solenoid drivers all look good with only a 5 degC temperature rise at worst case--the lower flippers.
Thermal image taken during solenoid testThermal image taken during solenoid test
The NTC thermistor is getting quite hot at 128 degC, but it is also supposed to get hot under heavy load. It is intended for inrush current limiting, so as it heats up, the resistance goes down, which is what I want. This is an intense load, so I expect normal operating condition to be much lower temperature. On the next rev of the PCB, I think I will try to improve the copper planes around the thermistor to better dissipate the heat.
The thermistor getting hot...it's okayThe thermistor getting hot...it's okay

#28 4 years ago

Your video makes me laugh. That rocks! I can't 100% remember your board layout, but you can always bring the current to the NTC on both the top and the bottom of the board. You may also want to consider not using thermal relief pads for the NTC through holes. It makes soldering the NTC more difficult, but it does reduce the resistance going to that guy. Might also spring for 2 oz copper if you haven't already. Regardless, it looks like your board is working fantastically well. Congratulations.

#29 4 years ago

Awesome benchmark! MPF can also help you to reduce the peak current in your machine. You can set "max_wait_ms" in your coil_player to allow MPF to sequence coil pulses to reduce stress on your PSU and maybe also on the NTC. No pulses will skipped. They might just happen a few ms later. We use this internally for drops, score reels and ball devices. Score reels on older machines will often fail without this because MPF would fire a lot of coils concurrently. Obviously this is nothing for flippper fingers or pops. But in a lot of other areas this can help to smooth out currents. Spike does something very similar.

#30 4 years ago

I am glad you guys enjoyed the video. I had to retake it because the first take startled me so bad I shook the camera when everything activated.

@openpinballproj, I already have no thermal reliefs on the high current planes. I think I can get the cooling effect I want just by tweaking the planes that are already there, but I might also add something to the bottom layer.

@jabdoa, that is good to know about the "max_wait_ms" command. I had not seen that anywhere in the documentation before.

I am shifting my focus to mounting some WS2812 RGB lights throughout the game. I am using them for both inserts and GI.

#31 4 years ago

I made some simple laser cut holders for the surface mount LEDs for the inserts. They are made from a laminated MDF board I had lying around. It was 0.1" thick.

The LEDs are intended to clip in, but I will also tack them down with a dab of hot glue to lock them in. These stay quite cool, so hot glue should be fine.

I still need to install these for real. The installation I show below was just for a test and was not optimized. I am using the screws and screw holes from the original lights.

I also need to figure out how to mount the bayonet LEDs for GI. Some of the locations have a perfect size hole for a tight friction fit, but other locations have a hole that is too big.

IMG_20191026_233659183 (resized).jpgIMG_20191026_233659183 (resized).jpgIMG_20191026_233855178 (resized).jpgIMG_20191026_233855178 (resized).jpgIMG_20191027_162803364 (resized).jpgIMG_20191027_162803364 (resized).jpg
#32 4 years ago
Quoted from cobra18t:

I also need to figure out how to mount the bayonet LEDs for GI. Some of the locations have a perfect size hole for a tight friction fit, but other locations have a hole that is too big.

The locations where the hole is "too big" had lamps with a red condom over them. There was a relay in the original game that toggled between them and the regular GI. In attract mode, it toggled on a ten second cycle, and in-game they were activated when in multiball.

The locations where the hole is too small is standard white GI. I had to drill mine out slightly to upgrade to OPMax lamps from Comet Pinball. Worth the playfield alteration entirely.

#33 4 years ago

Thank you! I thought that is what it was since every large hole is right next to a small hole. Almost all the red sleeves on my machine were missing or rattling around in the wrong place.

#34 4 years ago

Another option would be to use those: https://squareup.com/market/fast-pinball-llc/item/fast-rgb-led-insert. Or run your own PCBs. We fabbed some in China for larger inserts with multiple LEDs each for higher brightness and additional effects.

Jan

#35 4 years ago

Good point, Jan. I plan on running some insert LED boards the next time I try JLCPCB's assembly service.

#36 4 years ago

I mounted the electronics panel in the back of my temporary cabinet. I also installed 22 of the RGB LEDs to test them out. The result: some LEDs reacting to the drop targets and a pretty boring attract mode show!


IMG_20191029_234153456 (resized).jpgIMG_20191029_234153456 (resized).jpgIMG_20191029_213802326 (resized).jpgIMG_20191029_213802326 (resized).jpg
1 week later
#37 4 years ago

I got all the lights installed...

IMG_20191110_213753628 (resized).jpgIMG_20191110_213753628 (resized).jpg
#38 4 years ago

Wow! That's looking great!

I haven't forgotten about you for the plastic scans- I haven't had the time to get the glass off the machine.

I have a large bed scanner in my office that I've been meaning to break in and I'll be bringing them there.

#39 4 years ago

Good progress! I'm looking forward to this machine in action.

#40 4 years ago
Quoted from semicolin:

I haven't forgotten about you for the plastic scans- I haven't had the time to get the glass off the machine.

No worries. I am extremely patient when someone is about to give me something. I appreciate your help.

#41 4 years ago
Quoted from jabdoa:

Good progress! I'm looking forward to this machine in action.

Me too! I would never have attempted this without MPF. It makes this whole thing possible for me.

#42 4 years ago

I was able to play a game! Well, 1.5 balls worth of a game. Unfortunately, my right flipper linkage broke. Clearly it is time to rebuild the flippers.

Here is the second game played with left flippers only. Not everything is installed yet. There are also a number of adjustments to make like pop and slingshot sensitivities, coil strengths, playfield angle, and a bunch of config files left to write. Oh, and sound! It is a start, though.

IMG_20191113_234959475 (resized).jpgIMG_20191113_234959475 (resized).jpg
#43 4 years ago

Replaced the old and worn bushings, plungers, and coil sleeves. Now the flippers are smooth and strong!

A little too strong, actually. At the same time, I had bumped the voltage up 10% on the power supply. I need to dial it back down because I was getting a few too many airballs. I have no glass on and the ball hopped out a few times.

The pops and slings are dialed in now, too.

IMG_20191116_174918101 (resized).jpgIMG_20191116_174918101 (resized).jpgIMG_20191116_174851558 (resized).jpgIMG_20191116_174851558 (resized).jpg
#44 4 years ago

I have been making slow and steady progress with the MPF game development. I still have a ways to go before it is feature complete and the bugs are worked out. I have the start of sound and music.

#45 4 years ago

Not familiar with those flipper mechanisms. Judging by the design, it appears to be impossible to get any kinda power outa them, but you did. Those jet bumpers really got some mustard on them.too!

#46 4 years ago

Nice work! LEDs look great!

1 week later
#47 4 years ago

Here is an explanation of my current game development progress.

#48 4 years ago

A lot for rules for an EM. Well done!

#49 4 years ago

Thanks, Jan. It will be a little overkill for this game, but I want to get as much practice as possible before starting on my first original game.

#50 4 years ago

This is great. I had a Tag Team and this takes it to stunning!

Promoted items from Pinside Marketplace and Pinside Shops!
$ 8.00
Playfield - Other
Cobra Amusements
 
$ 83.00
Electronics
PinballReplacementParts
 
From: $ 15.00
Playfield - Protection
UpKick Pinball
 
There are 162 posts in this topic. You are on page 1 of 4.

Reply

Wanna join the discussion? Please sign in to reply to this topic.

Hey there! Welcome to Pinside!

Donate to Pinside

Great to see you're enjoying Pinside! Did you know Pinside is able to run without any 3rd-party banners or ads, thanks to the support from our visitors? Please consider a donation to Pinside and get anext to your username to show for it! Or better yet, subscribe to Pinside+!


This page was printed from https://pinside.com/pinball/forum/topic/re-game-1985-tag-team-pinball?hl=cobra18t and we tried optimising it for printing. Some page elements may have been deliberately hidden.

Scan the QR code on the left to jump to the URL this document was printed from.