(Topic ID: 145229)

Rating EM-Pins (?)

By rolf_martin_062

8 years ago


Topic Heartbeat

Topic Stats

You

Linked Games

No games have been linked to this topic.

    Topic Gallery

    View topic image gallery

    PI2.jpg
    PI.jpg

    You're currently viewing posts by Pinsider stashyboy.
    Click here to go back to viewing the entire thread.

    #23 8 years ago
    Quoted from John_I:

    The big problem with the EM ratings is lack of people actually rating games. The more people who rate games the better the ratings will be. That said, the EM ratings are a lot better now than they were a year ago. Aside from Rocket, all of the games in the top ten now have 11 or more ratings. The higher those numbers go, the better. I would rate Rocket, but I have never played it.
    So the message is to start ratings EMs! (And don't be a spite rater)
    Most of the EMs that I have at this point are games that I have sought out because I had previously played and like them. No surprise I rate them high...

    Not sure what the 'top 100 EMs list' moderators use as a formula to allow games in the list. At this point I thought we were beyond 3 ratings to make the list. Perhaps they/he can chime in here to shed some light on the subject. BTW, I only rate games I have owned, not even played elsewhere like shows or the PHoF. I want to give the game a fair chance with it being fully restored and set up properly.

    You're currently viewing posts by Pinsider stashyboy.
    Click here to go back to viewing the entire thread.

    Reply

    Wanna join the discussion? Please sign in to reply to this topic.

    Hey there! Welcome to Pinside!

    Donate to Pinside

    Great to see you're enjoying Pinside! Did you know Pinside is able to run without any 3rd-party banners or ads, thanks to the support from our visitors? Please consider a donation to Pinside and get anext to your username to show for it! Or better yet, subscribe to Pinside+!


    This page was printed from https://pinside.com/pinball/forum/topic/rating-em-pins?tu=stashyboy and we tried optimising it for printing. Some page elements may have been deliberately hidden.

    Scan the QR code on the left to jump to the URL this document was printed from.