@ejacques wrote: As a second idea, how about a seminar geared toward first time pin owners?
We had one! Friday at 1:00 PM.
@Playdium wrote: As far as games for sale not clearly identified, I recommended last year to have a distinct color card for those machines.
I know some other shows do that. The first step is to push people to pre-set the for sale data when they register the game. I've already commented on our plans for that aspect. We have conflicting needs for pre-printed base cards vs. print-on-demand for the whole card, and color would be a by-product of how we choose to print them. No matter what we do, there will be some cards printed at the show when the games arrive, so we'll also need a typographical distinction, even if we can arrange to have distinct color cards that meet our other constraints. I say all this to point out that we are faced with an engineering problem and we will take an engineering approach to making it better.
It's worth stating again that the online games list is also intended to serve as the advance list of what's for sale. You can also pull up that list at the show.
@Shredso wrote: Maybe a big white board or monitor with all the current games for sale and prices would help.
We're leaning toward monitors for other stuff, so we might be able to add this to the mix.
@Playdium also wrote: What about a row reserved for machines to be sold in the free play area.
This, too, works much better when people pre-set the for sale data when they register the game. We can use the count to estimate how much space to allot, and use our existing game-locator data to earmark games for that zone. It would be hard to guarantee that every for-sale game would be in such a cluster, but we ought to be able to cluster the majority. It would help us with game moves, too.
.................David Marston