Toronto, ON
OP - the biggest farce are your own ratings and the creation of this thread.
5.4 for JJPOTC and 9.8 for Munsters...lol and a cut and paste job for 4 or 5 of your review comments...gimme a break.
(Topic ID: 262677)
You're currently viewing posts by Pinsider pipes.
Click here to go back to viewing the entire thread.
Quoted from kklank:9.8 on a Munsters???????
Is that for the prettiest machine? !!! The code on that game sucks silver balls.
9.853 to be exact. He’s probably saving his 10 for the Thunderbirds review.
Quoted from Thunderbird:Lol, you that are picking on Munsters rating. Exactly the point.
I’m picking on only YOUR rating. Where it lands in the top 100 seems reasonable at #72 with a 7.9 rating. Rating games based on sales figures as you suggest is complete nonsense. It’s fine the way it is and shouldn’t be taken so seriously. Your ratings might be taken more seriously if you wouldn’t cut and paste the same comment for multiple games. That’s ridiculous.
Quoted from Thunderbird:The game is a great layout, then choosing through many characters that only change the game slightly and then no reference to the characters again, seems average...hence average score.
Sorry, what character do you play as on Munsters to warrant a near perfect score? It must be continually referenced during the game but I must have missed that.
The top 100 is just fine the way it is because ridiculous ratings like yours will get balanced out eventually which is why Munsters sits at #72....where it belongs.
You're currently viewing posts by Pinsider pipes.
Click here to go back to viewing the entire thread.
Reply
Wanna join the discussion? Please sign in to reply to this topic.
Hey there! Welcome to Pinside!
Donate to PinsideGreat to see you're enjoying Pinside! Did you know Pinside is able to run without any 3rd-party banners or ads, thanks to the support from our visitors? Please consider a donation to Pinside and get anext to your username to show for it! Or better yet, subscribe to Pinside+!
