Melbourne
PPS are just a licensee of mechanical pinball , like farsight, nothing to do with PPS
Scientific own the rights not PPS
(Topic ID: 216399)
You're currently viewing posts by Pinsider ballypinball.
Click here to go back to viewing the entire thread.
Quoted from bobukcat:PPS collects royalties for ROMs, reproduction parts (that aren't generic), anything with WMS art on it, etc. so it's hard to believe it's not them in this case, though I'm sure there could be some exclusion for digital reproduction.
It has nothing to do with PPS they are a licensee of mechanical pinball and merchandise only
Quoted from gtxjoe:Bummer. Who owns the Williams Bally pinball licenses?
Different people for different products have licenses
Bally itself have shoes, casinos, handbags heaps of licensees of many products, look at the guys who did the phone apps, ultrapin etc
Quoted from Spies:This is utterly rediculous, after all the effort they went to recreating these machines with the premise of being preserved forever in digital form.
Whats the real reason then if it's not PPS refusal to renew the license?
Because PPS don't own the rights
You're currently viewing posts by Pinsider ballypinball.
Click here to go back to viewing the entire thread.
Reply
Wanna join the discussion? Please sign in to reply to this topic.
Hey there! Welcome to Pinside!
Donate to PinsideGreat to see you're enjoying Pinside! Did you know Pinside is able to run without any 3rd-party banners or ads, thanks to the support from our visitors? Please consider a donation to Pinside and get anext to your username to show for it! Or better yet, subscribe to Pinside+!
