Oh also, I'm not saying it makes business sense to re-run Pin2k unless you can get a certain amount of numbers up. However, I'm just saying if you WERE to make something Pin2k-esque, it would need to be based on common architecture to ensure 1) The life of the product, 2) training costs for development are low and 3) maximum hardware architecture support as things change over the years.

Party pooper! Lets bust out QEMU and have some fun!

Oh also, I'm not saying it makes business sense to re-run Pin2k unless you can get a certain amount of numbers up. However, I'm just saying if you WERE to make something Pin2k-esque, it would need to be based on common architecture to ensure 1) The life of the product, 2) training costs for development are low and 3) maximum hardware architecture support as things change over the years.

Party pooper! Lets bust out QEMU and have some fun!

Its a sad state of affairs when MONEY and GREED stop people from making a hobby better.

Nowadays, there's very little distinction between these two. WOZ is built using an "embedded PC" running Linux.

The fact that one can replace P2K with a Nucore PC-based system shows that the P2K concept won't have to become obsolete and can continue to be upgraded based on the latest available technology, all of which is backwards-compatible.