Quoted from UNCgump:
The implication of specific exceptions for women's divisions remains that women are intrinsically inferior or delicate, which undermines the whole premise of gender equality. Is the likes if Zoe Vrabel (a top 500 IFPA player and player in the very controversy this thread us about) not sandbagging by playing a women's division?
The women's divisions exist because enough women want them to exist that it's feasible. There are no "implications" nor do they exist on the "premise of gender equity."
It really doesn't affect you, and it's not clear why you are so concerned about them.