I'd stick to the norm, 3 ball.

Maybe give an extra game for more money - like $8 gives you 5 games.

LTG : )

Not an op... but as a player I'd suggest 3 balls... but add a 5 to 7 second ball saver (instead of the default of no ball saver). When you play a 3 ball game and insta-drain 1 or 2 of those balls it really makes you want to play something else... versus leaving you with the "play one more" feeling from a game where all 3 balls let me have at least some time with them...

Regarding pricing $2 a game or $5 for 3 games ($1.67/game) or $8 for 5 games ($1.6) all seem good. Again from a player perspect I'd lean towards the 3 games for $5...

WOZ tends to attract newer players and ball times are super quick. I don't think 5 ball would hurt if you are trying to add more perceived value!

I have seen the 3 ball set up at Jenkinsons in NJ really turn off new players.

I would opt for 5.

Agree 100%.

WOZ can be a bit tough the first game or two, but it is beautiful and captivating enough that people will continue dropping $$$ into it as long as a modicum of hope that they are improving and getting somewhere in the game can be sustained.

I think pricing on the higher end is appropriate. It's an expensive game to buy, and even in attract mode distinguishes itself against just about anything else, not to mention all the cool in-game stuff - no problem objectively justifying a premium price to play.

WOZ is a tough game and I would bet that the percentage of players at any location that can really play for a long time if set to 5 ball is pretty low. I don't know how good or bad of a player I am but I have had machines in my home for over 20 years. It is rare that I really get anywhere on WOZ in 3 balls