Quoted from TheGunnett:Mo stuff, Mo problems! It’d the price of innovation. I hear a lot about what killed pinball and I think it has a lot to do with the fact they kept trying to one up the last machine and became overly complex and complicated.
What makes Sterns reliable is why most people complain about them! Simplicity in components ( Better themes and challenging rules also)
I manage a fleet of machines and whenever we see something new like the tailgate on the new GMCs that folds down in several stages my mechanics always so that going to be expensive to fix!
Innovation? Most of the mechs used have been around for decades. LCD's are fairly new to pinball, and they rarely have problems.
Sterns reliable? The new Spike-based machines are less reliable...cheap boards and power supplies.
The problem with NIB Stern games is they are trying to squeeze too much into a short period of time (in terms of both R&D and manufacturing). Iron Maiden is a great example. The Premium/LE has lot's of problems with the added goodies. Pro is much more solid. So, you get to spend an extra 2k and have more headaches...make sense?
Back in 2004, the SAM-based machines were much more reliable. My LOTR is just crazy reliable and it's been in the wild briefly (shows, arcades). Back in those days, the Stern designers weren't forced to build 2 games (Pro, Premium/LE). Added models/features and shorten the time-to-market and the result is bugs.
I'm pretty shocked the op claims 0 problems with his Stern games. Impressive. It's a crap shoot, that's for sure.
snaroff