Quoted from Ballypinball:Yes, Keith is right
I transferred full ownership of 78 US patents i bought from WMS to PPS
WMS no longer owns them, and they cost a fortune to renew, about $4k each for the 12 year renewal.
So why would you let someone make something or use it in a game without paying a licensing Fee.
Makes sense, just hard to keep track sometimes of the nuances as an outsider to those kinds of agreements. Is it still true WMS still owns the copyrights on software and artwork, and PPS just administers those? I never had to deal with PPS about patent issues, just software licensing.
Either way, it still makes sense as a board maker to get licensed properly. For a small company, a single C&D can be a huge financial hit. There's money tied up in inventory and development, even worse if you end up paying back penalties too. Yet if the boards are that important to game owners, it would be a huge benefit to be on the good graces of somebody with a big distribution network that might be interested in re-selling them. Yeah it costs a few bucks and some time to properly handle getting licensed, but it's a much larger pain in the ass to get caught violating a patent.
Oh, and yeah, a Mad Max pin would kick ass.
-Hans