Pinsiders(including myself until recently I got burned), are to quick to send funds with the promise of a rainbow. From the vendor standpoint its a no-brainer-no risk for them. Aurich said it a while back in this thread and it proves true. Don't send your hard worked for money for something that the hard work hasn't been done on yet. When we send money for an idea......we take all the risk. Doesn't seem like the best practice to me. I can't believe this topper is so hard to re-create. Williams must have used some sort of Alien technology that has since been lost on this one. I have bought off Twisted in the past with no problems so hopefully things work out for all involved.

The witch hunt begins.........

If you sent money without proof of product then your the only one to blame. Its easy to start pointing fingers when we get burned.

Selling a license and receiving royalties are totally different.

I think Twisted had a pretty good track record until they messed up this project. If PPS sells a licence to someone its pretty much a piece of paper stating you have permission to produce a product; not a person guarantee that if things go sideways PPS is on the hook. Seriously, i'm sure the licence fee on this wasn't much.

Yes it was, my bad. Although the second post was requesting a video of it in action and took how long for said video? Twisted kept beating-round-the-bush on posting a video. The effect this topper achieves is not seen with a pic so I kinda disagree that proof was shown. Either way the whole thing stinks!

It does definitely prove negligence that Twisted still has the toppers listed on their website for sale. Buyer beware.

I'm curious what the price will be on these?