I thought it was an episode like any other: a well thought out commentary and opinion piece. People may not agree with Nate's conclusions but to accuse him of bias is drawing such a long bow as to be utterly nonsensical (putting aside the obvious troll comments). Did anyone hear his evisceration of the GOT artwork - made AFTER the 'sponsorship' deal was done? It's a Clayton's sponsorship anyway - modest amounts of money that go to the players for their time and effort - not to Nate.
I find it hilarious how people who live in free market economies whinge about prices. Do you need a demand-supply curve drawn for you?
(Topic ID: 59770)
Cream Ridge, NJ
