Some of this I posted in another thread but it seems appropriate here.
I had the chance to hear the Multimorphic presentation at TPF and then play some games on Lexy, as a result I am very impressed. The tech and features are outstanding and I thought that Lexy game play was very good, the interactive playfield was certainly unique. I will be watching to see where they go with bumpers or other mechanical devices over the LCD portion of the playfield (that was where it misses the mark for me).
I see real promise in the redemption arena with Cannon Lagoon, it think that was a smart direction and a better target audience. I think quick, easy service/repair via the modular design could bring pinball back into places like D&Bs.
As far as making a purchase, the price point is a bit high but not a deal breaker, tech is cool and currently the game play is good but in the end the video game aspect left me missing the traditional playfield experience. I wish the team the best and will follow along with the progress but at this point I don't see one in my game room.

I'm probably in the "traditionalist" category but I also LIKE the dynamic content and do think it is an important part of the concept. That being said after playing a couple games I did feel like there was a "gap" between the flippers and the upper playfield. The dynamic content allows for scoring opportunities but it doesn't interact with the ball if that makes sense. Breaking the crates was cool the first time I did it but it didn't stick with me. These are not criticisms just my observations. I was impressed with the presentation and the things I read here, I do think you are on the right track. I think you will sell games, right now it isn't the right game for me but never say never.

Hmmm you bring up an interesting point, is it real or simply a perception based on visuals. I really had to go back and think about what I felt while playing. I do think the position of the wall modules may make the area seem longer than it really is. I think that visually the eye is drawn to the LCD and with the rather pastel image colors it exaggerates the distances, a bolder or more dimensional image might "shorten" the gap because most other machines the space seems more proportional (other than AFM which does feel barren).
The more I consider it I think the relatively "flat" image with the "abrupt" vertical elements of the back playfield are causing the illusion I experienced. I compared images with P3 and std pins and it really depends on what is on the display.

Side bar, one thing that my wife mentioned and caught my eye during the presentation was the ball trail, she didn't like it but I found while playing I didn't really notice it as much. Is that something that a user could turnoff?