I just don't get it. The art is not near as bad as it's being made out to be not to mention artwork doesn't make a game. Proof in point, TNA? The art on that game is much worse and yet the game is praised and celebrated beyond belief. That game was also praised for a lock that you spam over and over and over. This game has an interactive PF that the ball interacts with.
Quoted from Warzard:Also it’s a bit too much for me as fas as screen. I mean we are all already spending a lot of times behind smartphones, tv and computers and other screens... and pinball was a return to a mecanical experience were the screen is not the main thing. I can’t deny it’s interresting evolution but not for me.
I can appreciate someone not liking the rules or flow of a game but this is interesting. The TV is barely half of the game experience, at the most. It has physical targets, slings and flippers over the TV as well as other physical items. The only part of the game that's a TV is where most new games are just artwork anyways. With this concept that artwork can now be changed and be interactive. I agree about the smartphones and computers stuff but I don't understand the detain for it here but the praise for it on the backglass.
proof in point, all these PF are basically bare in the middle, same as LL. I'm not saying P3 is the greatest thing since sliced bread but it's got a lot more going for it than I feel it's getting credit for. If the cost was more in line with a NIB Stern I'd love to have one to give it a try.
AerosmithProPlayfield001 (resized).jpgBatman66Premium-PF-001 (resized).jpgPRO3overhead (resized).jpgStern-StarWars-LE-Playfield smXX-855x1501 (resized).jpgindex (resized).jpgLL-EE_03 (resized).png
