Springfield, VT
I understand why some people set scores a little low, I have trouble ranking games low even when I feel they are unplayable because of the crazy amount of work it takes to make a game playable, but to completely destroy and rank them based on bias or ignorance is lazy and unjust. Right now, since they separated sub-categories, a group of individuals are down-voting games that they probably have never even played so that they can preserve their favorite games instead of giving new games or games that are being looked favorably upon a lower ranking.
Rankings are subjective but people who have not even played a game or down-vote just to preserve their favorite's legacy is pathetic. This drives me mad no matter the game. If you give a game a fair score then you are doing our community a favor. You are no worse than the Star Wars trolls and the woke freedom fighters when you decide to rate a game just because your wittle baby favorite goes down in the rankings. The people who do this are the same people that ruin Rotten Tomatoes with their unintelligent shallow viewpoints based on nothing but biases. If you truly put time into the game, accurately take note of all aspects of the machine and give it a fair educated rating, you are obviously not the ones this post is directed at.
