Quoted from pezpunk:This is so dumb. If Stern and JJP fail, it's won't be because of MMR. It's telling of Stern's lack of innovation that a design from 1997 can still compete with their latest offerings. What makes those companies so entitled to our patronage? Why shouldn't pinball enthusiasts buy the machine they most desire? Your argument makes no sense.
also congratulations on being YET ANOTHER person who has no interest in buying an MMR hopping in to a thread about official MMR updates.
Sigh... more cluelessness. You and others seem to think mine is an accusatory stance, and it is not. I even stated as much in my post, but apparently a lot of Pinside can't comprehend basic English. Again, I am not encouraging Rick to stop. He asked for perspectives and I gave him one.
It is simple cause and effect. Money spent on MMR is money not spent on other, new games. $8 million is a lot of money. If sales of new games suffer as a result, the companies that make them may close. I am not choosing sides between Stern, JJP or Rick, I'm simply stating potential reprucussions. Money for pinballs is not umlimited, and running a pinball factory of any sort is expensive. Can the market support 3 companies producing new games, PLUS all the used games currently for sale?
How many people, in 1997, would have thought Stern would outlive the mighty WMS going into 2000? How many of you were even around in 1997? If Jack or Stern fail to sell enough product, they will close, possibly abruptly, and that will be bad.
Finally, you really shouldn't speak without knowing all the facts. We have an MMR on order, so your last statement is complete and utter bullshit. We already have an original low play MM, but were intrigued by potential new technology on this one, so put a deposit down. One will get sold. Which MM we decide to keep depends on how the new one looks, and what the "TBD" line on the comparison chart looks like.