Quoted from KozMckPinball:The ball lands in the stands, it's a home run. In this case, the ball landed on the field of play, no home run. It's either an out or a double in this case, as Betts threw the ball in and Altuve was on second. Either way, the 'Stros only get one run there not 2. They lost by 2.
Yes they lost by 2 runs....and probably the right call and rule change that should happen is it should have been called a ground rule double. One run would have scored but it also would not have been an out and who knows if the Astros would have scored more runs or not.....water under the bridge at this point but a rule change to take the fans out of it and make it fair in these situations would be to make it a ground rule double.
Think if it had been a Boston fan that had interfered......how upset would people be.....reverse the scenario and what if this was a hit by the Red Sox.....the call would have hurt them. Just don’t understand why it would not be a ground rule double....end of story and move on. You can not definitively prove the ball would have been caught if there had been no interference. A rule change should be highly considered...and one thing to note is the one camera angle that might have shown if the ball was out of the field of play was blocked by a security guard....a lot of good that did.