(Topic ID: 276266)

Look who's back!

By arcademrs

3 years ago


Topic Heartbeat

Topic Stats

  • 33 posts
  • 24 Pinsiders participating
  • Latest reply 3 years ago by RCA1
  • Topic is favorited by 2 Pinsiders

You

Linked Games

No games have been linked to this topic.

    Topic Gallery

    View topic image gallery

    lookwhoseback (resized).jpg
    E1743B9F-870A-475E-BCB5-13E4E5566B77 (resized).jpeg
    2BACF936-E39E-4ACB-9454-77469FEBBC83 (resized).jpeg

    #1 3 years ago

    Maybe we could pay you NOT to podcast.

    23
    #2 3 years ago

    I clicked thinking O-din was back.

    #3 3 years ago
    Quoted from arcademrs:

    Maybe we could pay you NOT to podcast.

    Wow he must live in your head, lol

    #4 3 years ago
    Quoted from JohnnyPinball007:

    I clicked thinking O-din was back.

    Me three

    #5 3 years ago

    Plus one on O-din

    #6 3 years ago

    Me too

    #7 3 years ago
    Quoted from JohnnyPinball007:

    I clicked thinking O-din was back.

    Same. Bummed he is not

    11
    #8 3 years ago
    2BACF936-E39E-4ACB-9454-77469FEBBC83 (resized).jpeg2BACF936-E39E-4ACB-9454-77469FEBBC83 (resized).jpeg
    #10 3 years ago
    Quoted from arcademrs:

    Maybe we could pay you NOT to podcast.

    I'm the only one paying people NOT to podcast

    #11 3 years ago

    Who’s back? Doesn’t really say in any of the posts. I was hoping for O-din , he is one of the people from pinside that I’d like to hang out with but haven’t gotten the chance yet.

    #12 3 years ago

    Exactly....it's "Whom's back" for fuck sakes.

    #13 3 years ago
    Quoted from TheLaw:

    Exactly....it's "Whom's back" for fuck sakes.

    Is it fuck sakes or fuck’s sake. I always say it the latter but really don’t know which is correct. I’ve heard it both ways

    13
    #14 3 years ago
    Quoted from TheLaw:

    Exactly....it's "Whom's back" for fuck sakes.

    Negatory. Who is a subject, whom is an object. Who is back? is grammatically correct because who is the subject of the sentence. You would use whom for things like, "This is for whom?" or "To whom am I speaking?"

    And it would be "for Fuck's sake." FYI It is Fuck whose sake we are bemoaning.

    #15 3 years ago
    Quoted from fireball2:

    Negatory. Who is a subject, whom is an object. Who is back? is grammatically correct because who is the subject of the sentence. You would use whom for things like, "This is for whom?" or "To whom am I speaking?"
    And it would be "for Fuck's sake." FYI It is Fuck whose sake we are bemoaning.

    Wow. Both points are 100% grammatically correct here. Well done sir.

    #16 3 years ago
    Quoted from fireball2:

    Who is a subject, whom is an object....

    You fucking people....8 years it never changes.

    #17 3 years ago

    Thanks Mang! I've taught English for over 30 years and went to 12 years of Catholic school to boot. I could diagram a sentence even three sheets to the wind... like the nuns I learned from.

    #18 3 years ago
    Quoted from TheLaw:

    You fucking people....8 years it never changes.

    Oh stop. I can be as crabby as you, Cowboy, and I don't usually go there. But if'n people want to, I'ma go toe to toe with anyone in a grammar way. I can make 7th graders care about grammar!
    Relax. You'll live longer.

    #19 3 years ago

    Guess who's back, back again
    Shady's back, tell a friend
    Guess who's back, guess who's back?
    Guess who's back, guess who's back?
    Guess who's back, guess who's back?
    Guess who's back?

    E1743B9F-870A-475E-BCB5-13E4E5566B77 (resized).jpegE1743B9F-870A-475E-BCB5-13E4E5566B77 (resized).jpeg
    #20 3 years ago
    Quoted from TheLaw:

    You fucking people....8 years it never changes.

    I have to admit I’m a little confused, do you have some sort of running joke going with using “whom” incorrectly? I’ve noticed you doing it but never really cared enough to call you out on it. Just figured it was your thing, kind of like making bird noises is my thing.

    #21 3 years ago
    Quoted from fireball2:

    Negatory. Who is a subject, whom is an object. Who is back? is grammatically correct because who is the subject of the sentence. You would use whom for things like, "This is for whom?" or "To whom am I speaking?"
    And it would be "for Fuck's sake." FYI It is Fuck whose sake we are bemoaning.

    I have always had confusion on when to use “farther” and “further”...could you please provide the correct gramner rules on their use?

    #22 3 years ago

    This ain’t a damn grammar class. It’s fucking macho!

    #23 3 years ago

    Who's back? It's not o-din or Vid so it must be the K Man?

    #24 3 years ago

    Who(m) is back? And what happened to O-din? I may have Rip Van Winkled through all the excitement.

    #25 3 years ago
    Quoted from Who-Dey:

    Who's back? It's not o-din or Vid so it must be the K Man?

    Could someone please explain why vid stopped posting here? Thanks

    #26 3 years ago
    Quoted from scampcamp:

    Could someone please explain why vid stopped posting here? Thanks

    Newbs arguing playfield material/density.

    #27 3 years ago
    Quoted from scampcamp:

    Could someone please explain why vid stopped posting here? Thanks

    He got tired of being wrong about stern playfield cratering (which is much different than "normal" minor dimpling). Then when his "secret" harassment/shill accounts got shut down for being naughty and breaking pinside TOS, he got the hint.

    #28 3 years ago

    Im back....but then again...i pretty much never leave, soo..........

    #29 3 years ago
    Quoted from TheLaw:

    Newbs arguing playfield material/density.

    Yep I agree. Wood is the same. The cc matters

    #30 3 years ago

    Back to this important issue, it depends how many fucks the sakes of which are in question.

    One fuck: for fuck's sake

    Multiple fucks: for fucks' sakes

    The shorthand FFS is especially useful, in that the reader can fill in their preferred version in their mind, correctly punctuated or no, as is their wont.

    #31 3 years ago

    LOOK !! whose back ?

    lookwhoseback (resized).jpglookwhoseback (resized).jpg
    #32 3 years ago

    I've no more fucks to give...... (look it up)

    #33 3 years ago

    It's almost like his absence was some sort of attention grab.
    Nah. That's not possible at all.

    Reply

    Wanna join the discussion? Please sign in to reply to this topic.

    Hey there! Welcome to Pinside!

    Donate to Pinside

    Great to see you're enjoying Pinside! Did you know Pinside is able to run without any 3rd-party banners or ads, thanks to the support from our visitors? Please consider a donation to Pinside and get anext to your username to show for it! Or better yet, subscribe to Pinside+!


    This page was printed from https://pinside.com/pinball/forum/topic/look-who-s-back?hl=otto110 and we tried optimising it for printing. Some page elements may have been deliberately hidden.

    Scan the QR code on the left to jump to the URL this document was printed from.